HomeMy WebLinkAbout16. 20-425 OCTOBER 13, 2020 20-425 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 6-0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
AS AMENDED
PURPOSE: APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR COMMERICAL USE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1844 OSHKOSH AVENUE
INITIATED BY: PRIME SPACE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/conditions
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan for the proposed planned development for commercial use
at 1844 Oshkosh Avenue, is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-387(6) of
the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for the
planned development for commercial use at 1844 Oshkosh Avenue, per the attached, is
hereby approved with the following conditions:
1. Cross access drive aisle required for access to adjoining property to the east.
2L. Southern access ftem 4. Keeller Street shall be right in-, right out only with fi
design approved by the Depart-ment of Public Works.
3. BSM to allow reduced front yard setback (north) to 11' for bike rack pad.
4. BSM to allow reduced side yard setback (east) to 5' for parking lot/drive-thru.
5. BSM to allow reduced main entrance side building foundation landscaping
points to 0 points for the north building and 0 points on south building where
88.4 points and 74 points, respectively, are required. Minimum 88.4 landscaping
points shall be applied to the street side of the north building and 74 points shall
be applied to the street side of the south building.
6. BSM to allow increased number of ground signs to 2, where code allows 1 per
street frontage.
7. BSM to allow reduced front yard setback for monument sign to 5' (south) and
10.7' (north).
8. BSM to allow increased lighting level along east property line to 0.6 footcandle.
9. Final landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of
Community Development.
Bold & Italics Indicates Amendment
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons, Planning Service Manager
DATE: October 8, 2020
RE: Approve General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for
Commercial Development at 1844 Oshkosh Avenue (Plan Commission
Recommends Approval)
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS
The subject site is a 108,886 square foot (2.49 acre) irregular -shaped vacant parcel located on the
east side of N. Koeller Street, north of Oshkosh Avenue. The property is zoned Corporate
Business Park with a Planned Development Overlay (CBP-PD) and the surrounding area
consists predominately of vacant commercial land as well as Lakeshore Park to the north. The
2040 Comprehensive Plan recommends Interstate Commercial land use for the subject property.
The proposed development consists of two commercial buildings. The north building is a two-
story 21,516 sq. ft. mixed use building containing first floor retail and restaurant spaces and
second floor professional office space and also includes a covered patio space to be utilized by
tenants and guests. The south building will be a 7,896 sq. ft. single story multi -tenant retail
building which will also have a drive-thru lane for potential coffee sales or similar tenant.
The following items were discussed during the Plan Commission meeting:
Driveway access north of the Oshkosh Ave./N. Koeller St. roundabout:
o The applicant proposed two full -access driveways onto N. Koeller Street.
o Due to the proximity of the roundabout, City staff recommended that one full -
access driveway be moved to the north and align with the Rath Lane/N. Koeller
intersection, or that the driveway be changed to a right in, right out only access.
o In an effort to work with the applicant, Plan Commission approved a right in, right
out only access at the applicant's desired location on N. Koeller Street.
o Plan Commission also required a cross access drive for access to the adjoining
property to the east which will provide a third access point to the site.
o In response to the questions related to the safest locations for driveways for that
site, staff contacted KL Engineering, who did the original Traffic Impact Analysis
for the area and asked them to provide their professional opinion (a copy of that
correspondence is enclosed.)
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236,5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
Building elevation currently meets 75% Class I materials code:
o The applicant preferred an alternative building design that did not meet the 75%
Class I exterior materials of the Corporate Business Park District.
o Plan Commission recommended approval of the code compliant elevations.
o The applicant may submit for a future SIP amendment to modify the exterior
building materials.
o At this time staff is comfortable with the requested Base Standard Modifications.
o If the applicant chooses to apply for an amendment to reduce the Class I building
material, Council may want to reevaluate if sufficient improvements have been
offered to justify the requested Base Standard Modifications.
Plan Commission approved the building elevations as submitted and the access points to the
site at the proposed locations with a condition that the southern driveway be right in, right out
only.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this project should result in an increase in assessed property value for the site and
should require no additional city service provision. The owner is anticipating spending
approximately $4.3 million on the improvements. The proposed development is located in Tax
Incremental District No. 35 and will add increment to the District.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan with findings and conditions at its October 6, 2020 meeting. Please see the
attached staff report and meeting minutes for more information.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
Approved:
Mark A. Rohloff
City Manager
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236,5000 http://w-ci.Oshkosh .Wi.us
ITEM: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 1844 OSHKOSH AVENUE
Plan Commission meeting of October 6, 2020.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Vision Architecture LLC: Adam James
Property Owner: Prime Space Development
Action(s) Requested:
The petitioner requests approval of a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a commercial development at 1844 Oshkosh Avenue.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Background Information Property Location and Type:
The subject site is a 108,886 square foot (2.49acre) irregular -shaped vacant parcel located on the
east side of N. Koeller Street, north of Oshkosh Avenue. The property is zoned Corporate
Business Park with a Planned Development Overlay (CBP-PD) and the surrounding area
consists predominately of vacant commercial land as well as Lakeshore Park to the north. The
2040 Comprehensive Plan recommends Interstate Commercial land use for the subject property.
Subject Site
Existing Land Use
Zoning
Vacant
CBP-PD
Adiacent Land Use and Zonin
Existing
Uses
Zoning
North
Park
I
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
South
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Vacant
CBP-PD
East
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Vacant
CBP-PD
West
Commercial/vacant
CBP-PD
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation
Land Use
2040 Land Use Recommendation
Interstate Commercial
ANALYSIS
Use
The proposed development consists of a two commercial buildings. The north building is a
two-story 21,516 sq. ft. mixed use building containing first floor retail and restaurant spaces and
second floor professional office space and also includes a covered patio space to be utilized by
tenants and guests. The south building will be a 7,896 sq. ft. single story multi -tenant retail
building which will also have a drive-thru lane for potential coffee sales or similar tenant.
Site Design/Access
The proposed development will have two accesses from N. Koeller Street. Department of Public
Works staff is recommending a condition that the southern driveway be right -in, right -out
access only to alleviate traffic concerns on N. Koeller Street. Staff is also recommending a
condition that a cross -access drive aisle be included for access to the vacant property to the east
to provide a connection to future development. This has been provided on the site plan and
will require a cross -access agreement.
ENVC
SITE PLAN
Site Plan
Required
Provided
Parking Spaces
Minimum:98
100
Impervious Surface
Maximum: 70% of lot
70% of lot
The parking lot provided on the site plan meets the minimum parking requirement of 1 space
per 300 square feet of gross floor area for indoor sales, restaurant and office uses. The total
impervious surface area for the site is 76,349 sq. ft., which is at the maximum impervious
surface ratio for the CBP District. The plan includes a dumpster enclosure on the east side of
the parking lot. The proposed dumpster enclosure is constructed of Trex composite fencing.
ITEMVA GDP/SIP-1844 Oshkosh Ave 2
The dumpster enclosure plan will need to be modified to include materials and colors that are
consistent with the principal buildings per CBP accessory structure standards.
Building/Parking Setbacks
Minimum
Provided
Front Setback (west)
30 ft.
30.1 ft.
Front Setback (north)
30 ft.
11 ft. (bike rack ad)
Side Setback (east)
10 ft.
5 ft. (parking lot)
Side Setback (south)
10 ft.
22 ft.
The proposed buildings meet setback requirements for the CBP District, however the bicycle
parking area extends into the front (north) setback and the parking lot and drive-thru lane
extend into the side (east) setback area. Staff is supportive of the reduced setbacks for the
bicycle parking pad and parking lot/drive-thru areas as site constraints related to the unique lot
configuration result in difficulties meeting setbacks and providing required parking. Also,
these setback reductions should not cause concerns for the surrounding area as the bicycle
parking pad is relatively small in area and the eastern parking/drive-thru area will likely be
abutting a similar commercial parking lot with shared access.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
The applicant has been in discussion with the Department of Public Works regarding storm
water management for the area. Public Works has noted that water quality will need to be
provided for the site. Finalized storm water management plans will need to be submitted and
approved as part of the Site Plan Review processes.
Landscaping
Points Required
Points Provided
Building Foundation
177 (88.4 side of main
Point total not provided
(north)
entrance, 44.2 street side)
Building Foundation
148 (74 side of main
Point total not provided
(south)
entrance, 37 street side)
585 (176 tall trees 234
652.9
Paved Area
(210 tall trees, 242.9
shrubs)
shrubs)
Street Frontage
669.6
647 (324 medium trees)
(330 medium trees)
Yards
588
671
Yards devoted to street
frontage
294
308
Total
2,145
2,326
ITEM V A GDP/ SIP —1844 Oshkosh Ave
.�I
I�I
21
�X
MI
m
stµ �
.,.:�s f
sy
SrrGLI STOW XLLA )M
FF EL.=(M20)
LAMpSL'APE PLAN p�
Building Foundation
The applicant has demonstrated that the landscape plan meets the total point requirement for
combined building foundation area for both buildings combined. However, building
foundation points must be applied separately for each building. The applicant will need to
demonstrate the foundation point requirements are being met separately for both buildings.
This can be provided as part of the Site Plan Review process.
The landscaping ordinance specifies that 50% of the required points must be located along the
main entrance side of the building, or in this case the north facade of the south building and
east facade of the north building. The plan does not meet the main entrance side point
requirement for either building as no landscaping is shown along these facades. Staff is
supportive of a Base Standard Modification (BSM) to allow the main entrance side point
requirement to be applied to the street side facades of each building (south and east facade of
south building and west facade of north building), as the intent of the code is being met with
these facades being most visible from the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to
demonstrate that this point requirement is being met during the Site Plan Review process.
ITEM V A GDP/ SIP —1844 Oshkosh Ave 4
Paved Area
The paved area requirement of 50 landscaping points per 10 parking stalls or 10,000 sq. ft. of
paved area is being met. The code further specifies 30% of all points will be devoted to tall trees
and 40% will be devoted to shrubs. A tall deciduous/shade tree is required at the ends of all
parking rows. These requirements are also being met.
Street Frontage
Code requires 100 points per 100 feet of street frontage. The landscaping ordinance also
specifies that 50% of the required points must be devoted to medium trees. The landscape plan
shows medium trees along the frontage which meet the 50% point total requirement. The CBP
standards also require 50% of yard landscaping points to be located along street frontages,
which is also being met. All landscaping devoted to street frontage points must be located
within 10' of the public right-of-way.
Yards
Code requires 20 landscaping points per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The provided yard
landscaping points exceeds this requirement and meets the street frontage point requirement as
previously noted.
Siege
Proposed signage for the site includes two 10' tall X 14' wide monument signs along N. Koeller
St., where code allows a maximum of one ground sign per street frontage. The proposed sign
along the south entrance will have a 5' front yard setback and the sign along the north entrance
will have a 10.7' setback where a 30' setback is required. The applicant is requesting BSMs for
both the number of ground signs and the setback reduction. Staff is supportive of the BSM to
allow a second ground sign as the frontage wraps around and functions as though as has two
frontages. Staff is also supportive of a BSM to allow a reduced setbacks as the proposed sign
locations are consistent with reduced setbacks of neighboring monument signs within the
Corporate Business Park District to the east. Also, as proposed the parking and building areas
will be built out to the setbacks leaving no space for ground signage meeting the front setback
requirement. The maximum height for the monument signs is 10' per CBP signage standards.
!— —a
Tenant Tenant4
Tenant Tenant F
Tenant Tenant
Tenant Tenant
Tenant Tenant
Tenant Tenant
ITEM V A GDP/ SIP —1844 Oshkosh Ave 5
Wall signage is shown on the building elevations for both buildings. Wall signage will be
limited to 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage with a maximum of 15% of the wall area
per building facade. This can be addressed under a separate building permit.
Site Lighting
A photometric plan has been provided by the applicant. The provided plan appears to meet the
maximum 0.5 foot candle lighting level allowed at the property lines, with the exception of 0.6
fc lighting level along the east property line. Staff is supportive a BSM to allow the slightly
increased lighting level in this location as this area is an adjoining a commercial lot with shared
access. The plan does not show lighting levels at the west property line. A revised lighting
plan will need to be provided during the site plan review process to verify that it does not
exceed 0.5 fc at the public right-of-way. The minimum lighting level of 0.4 foot candle is being
met for the parking area.
Building Facades
Building Materials
The Corporate Business Park standards require buildings to be clad on all sides with at least
75% Class I materials. Also, window and door area shall comprise at least 40% of the ground
floor level of the street facing facade. The specific elevations breakdown is as follows:
North Building
Required Class I
Provided Class I
North
75%
92.7%
South
75%
78 8%
East
75%
85.5%
West
75%
100%
Street facing
40% door/window
ground floor (north
92 7%
facade)
area
Street facing
40% door/window
ground floor (west
40.4%
facade)
area
South Building
Required Class I
Provided Class I
North
75%
92%
South
75%
88.3%
East
75%
79.7%
West
75%
82.8%
Street facing
40% door/window
ground floor (west
44.3%
facade)
area
ITEM V A GDP/ SIP —1844 Oshkosh Ave
Both buildings meet design standards requirements for building materials on all facades. The
applicant is proposing to exceed the minimum of 75% Class I on all facades of both buildings.
The minimum door/window area of 40% for street facing ground floor elevations is also being
met.
ALIZMIAI ""'r"'
■M■I ■■■ ■■■ MEN
MEN ■■l son ONE
mom MM MSS ME
WEST ELEVATION
North Building.
NORTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
--' SI%nape
1
�'i1111 111 �� 111�11 �11111
SOUTH ELEVATION
South Building
V:..,.
I 1
ITEMVA GDP/SIP-1844 Oshkosh Ave 7
Building Composition
Corporate Business Park standards require buildings to be designed with four-sided detail and
a distinct base, middle and top. The base of the building shall be articulated with a horizontal
expression line creating a distinct ground level zone. The mid -section shall be articulated to
form an expression line which sets up the building's top, while the top portion of the building
shall include architectural features that provide distinction and clearly shows a division of roof
and walls. The front facade shall include architectural features which emphasize it as the front
facade.
The proposed elevations for the south building meet these standards as conopies and variation
of materials provide distinction to the facades and projections related to the entrance are
utilized to emphasize the front facades.
The north building elevations also meet building composition standards as entrance canopies
along the first floor entrances along with a covered patio area define the ground floor of the
building. The windows shown on the elevations provide distinction of floor levels and the
projections at the top of the building show a division of roof and walls. The expansive glass
window and door areas on the front (north and west) elevations serve to emphasize the front
facade.
Overall Site
The applicant is requesting BSMs related to landscaping for specific locations, increased number
of ground signs, and reduced sign and pavement setbacks. To offset the landscaping code
deficiencies, increased number of signs and reduced monument sign and pavement setbacks,
the applicant has exceeded the overall landscaping point requirement for the site and also
exceeded the minimum Class I material allotment for both buildings. Landscaping has also been
added around the monument signs to soften its appearance from the public right-of-way. Staff
is comfortable that the applicant has adequately offset the requested BSMs and the overall site is
complimentary to the surrounding area.
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned
Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings
based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose
and intent of this Chapter.
(b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to
determine such consistency.)
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts
in the environs of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
ITEMVA GDP/SIP-1844 Oshkosh Ave
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
(i) The proposed Planned Development project will produce significant benefits in terms
of environmental design and significant alternative approaches to addressing
development performance that relate to and more than compensate for any requested
exceptions/base standard modifications variation of any standard or regulation of this
Chapter.
Staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan
and the findings listed above with the proposed following conditions:
1. Cross access drive aisle required for access to adjoining property to the east.
2. Southern access from N. Koeller Street shall be right -in, right -out only with final design
approved by the Department of Public Works.
3. BSM to allow reduced front yard setback (north) to I for bike rack pad.
4. BSM to allow reduced side yard setback (east) to 5' for parking lot/drive-thru.
5. BSM to allow reduced main entrance side building foundation landscaping points to 0
points for the north building and 0 points on south building where 88.4 points and 74
points, respectively, are required. Minimum 88.4 landscaping points shall be applied to
the street side of the north building and 74 points shall be applied to the street side of
the south building.
6. BSM to allow increased number of ground signs to 2, where code allows 1 per street
frontage.
7. BSM to allow reduced front yard setback for monument sign to 5' (south) and 10.7
(north).
8. BSM to allow increased lighting level along east property line to 0.6 footcandle.
9. Final landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of
Community Development.
The Plan Commission approved of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation
Plan with findings and conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on
the item.
Site Inspections Report: Mr. Hinz and Ms. Propp reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
The petitioner requests approval of a General Development Plan (GDP) and Specific
Implementation Plan (SIP) for a commercial development at 1844 Oshkosh Avenue.
Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is requesting BSMs related to
ITEMVA GDP/SIP-1844 Oshkosh Ave
landscaping for specific locations, increased number of ground signs, and reduced sign and
pavement setbacks. To offset the landscaping code deficiencies, increased number of signs and
reduced monument sign and pavement setbacks, the applicant has exceeded the overall
landscaping point requirement for the site and also exceeded the minimum Class I material
allotment for both buildings. Landscaping has also been added around the monument signs to
soften its appearance from the public right-of-way. Staff is comfortable that the applicant has
adequately offset the requested BSMs and the overall site is complimentary to the surrounding
area. He said staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan and the findings listed above with the conditions and findings as listed in
the staff report.
Ms. Propp opened technical questions to staff.
Ms. Propp asked how the right -in and right -out will be signed.
Mr. Gohde replied that there would be a triangular piece in the middle to prevent them from
trying to turn left. He said that if someone was trying to turn left, they would need to go into
the opposite lane of traffic, around the median, and stop all traffic from turning in. He said that
the raised island generally prevents people from turning left.
Mr. Lyons stated that the right -in and right -out design would be consistent with the one for
Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins.
Mr. Marshall asked if the developments in the area are intended to be uniform in appearance
and color.
Mr. Lyons replied that they are not specifying color, only the percentage of material types. He
said the color palettes might be a more modern architectural design choice.
Mr. Marshall stated that this is a huge development along a major corridor of our city, so he
wants to make sure that things are visually appealing.
Mr. Lyons stated that when Council and Plan Commission originally approved the Corporate
Business Park, there was a very high standard in terms of types of materials. He said it was a
purposeful decision made at that time.
Mr. Mitchell asked if the ten -foot sign was five feet off the road or five feet off the sidewalk.
Mr. Lyons replied that one sign is roughly five feet off the inside edge of the sidewalk and one
sign is roughly ten feet off the inside edge of the sidewalk.
Mr. Mitchell stated that the large ten -foot sign seemed like it would be a little out of place given
the location and proximity to the road.
Mr. Lyons replied that it would be consistent with what was done with the development to the
east.
ITEMVA GDP/SIP-1844 Oshkosh Ave 10
Ms. Propp asked if there were any visual problems with the monument signs.
Mr. Lyons replied that they would have to be outside of the vision triangles.
Ms. Propp asked if there were any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make
any statements.
Mr. Adam James of Vision Architecture LLC. stated that the right -in and right -out came up
somewhat late in the process and it will create a hardship for the owners. The tenants for the
south building will not sign a lease if the access is denied. This is a concern because there is
already a deed restriction that pushing the driveway to where it is. During the workshop, he
had some elevations that showed alternative materials for the facade of the building, but these
were not allowed based on the 75% Class I material requirements. He does not agree they are
not long-lasting or of similar high -quality, and they had to revise the elevations to Class I
materials to obtain approval. Mr. James encouraged Plan Commission to review the Class I
materials list so that designers can use more creativity and materials that provide better visual
interest.
Mr. Marshall asked for clarification on Class I materials.
Mr. Lyons replied that they are classified as glass, brick, brick veneer, stone, and stone veneer.
Mr. Marshall asked for an example of what materials could be used to provide better visual
interest.
Mr. James replied that they originally had put in aluminum composite panels, which are very
common, durable, and long-lasting. Another material there were planning to use is long -board
extruded aluminum siding, which is a thick, heavy-duty material than can be used to achieve
accurate and beautiful wood grain looks. He said that it changes the texture and scale in the
building without sacrificing the longevity of the materials or visual quality of the building.
Mr. Marshall asked if they could use a different brick color.
Mr. James replied that they could investigate that.
Mr. Hinz asked about the time constraints of the project to see if this item could be laid over so
City staff could have more time to come up with a better consensus in terms of the design.
Mr. James replied that he provided City staff with the alternative design.
Mr. Lyons replied that the materials used for the alternative design were significantly below the
materials standard.
Mr. Hinz replied that Plan Commission had discussed expanding their definition of Class I
materials.
ITEM VA GDP/SIP-1844 Oshkosh Ave 11
Mr. Lyons replied that they have not been provided material samples like they have with other
applicants to help with that discussion. He said the applicant and owner were made aware by
Public Works for over a year that it would need to be right -in and right -out only. He said that
they have had some of these discussions and it has been a struggle to get to this point.
Mr. Hinz replied if they maybe they could get the samples if they had a couple of weeks, noting
that what was presented at the workshop was very beautiful.
Mr. James stated that he did not provide physical samples, but he provided product brochures.
Mr. Lyons replied that they need physical samples.
Mr. James replied that if they had asked for it, he would have certainly provided them. He said
that at this point he would really like to get approval and get moving. He said that he can work
through the elevation issues with staff, but at this point they are running out of time.
Mr. Gohde stated that there are intersection and driveway separation requirements for roads
that serve commercial or manufacturing properties. He said that turning conflicts were created
by shifting the driveway and they are not meeting code for the driveway spacing from the
intersection.
Mr. Lyons stated that if full access is approved, it could create a conflict with the new applicant
to the west who may also request full access.
Mr. Adams replied that if they moved the driveway to line up with Rath lane, there would be
traffic coming from over the back corner off the curve. He said that they were concerned with
sight lines, which is why they pushed the driveway south.
Mr. Marshall asked for confirmation that this was a safety issue for City staff.
Mr. Gohde replied affirmatively.
Ms. Propp asked Mr. James for confirmation that one or two tenants will not sign a lease.
Mr. James replied affirmatively.
Ms. Propp stated that it seemed dangerous to her without the right -in and right -out and that
they should have taken care of the materials at the workshop.
Mr. Lyons replied that they only had pictures at the workshop, not the materials.
Mr. Hinz stated that it was clear that the materials were not brick from the pictures.
Mr. Mitchell stated that the right -in and right -out is a safer option for pedestrian traffic.
ITEM V A GDP/ SIP —1844 Oshkosh Ave 12
Mr. Ford asked if there was a possibility the applicant could wait two weeks and submit the
materials to planning.
Mr. James replied that except for the physical materials, everything has already been submitted.
Two weeks is not a viable solution because they do not have time.
There were no public comments on this item.
Ms. Propp closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
There were no closing statements from the applicant.
Motion by Ford to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Conditions:
10. Cross access drive aisle required for access to adjoining property to the east.
11. Southern access from N. Koeller Street shall be right -in, right -out only with final design
approved by the Department of Public Works.
12. BSM to allow reduced front yard setback (north) to IY for bike rack pad.
13. BSM to allow reduced side yard setback (east) to 5' for parking lot/drive-thru.
14. BSM to allow reduced main entrance side building foundation landscaping points to 0 points for
the north building and 0 points on south building where 88.4 points and 74 points, respectively,
are required. Minimum 88.4 landscaping points shall be applied to the street side of the north
building and 74 points shall be applied to the street side of the south building.
15. BSM to allow increased number of ground signs to 2, where code allows 1 per street frontage.
16. BSM to allow reduced front yard setback for monument sign to 5' (south) and 10.7' (north).
17. BSM to allow increased lighting level along east property line to 0.6 footcandle.
18. Final landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community
Development.
Seconded by Hinz.
Ms. Propp asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Ms. Davey stated that safety needs to trump design.
Mr. Ford stated that maybe this is an impetus for Plan Commission to revisit the Class I
material idea.
Mr. Hinz agreed with Mr. Ford.
Motion carried 9-0.
ITEM V A GDP/ SIP —1844 Oshkosh Ave 13
CA Dept. TO:
City of Oshkosh Dept. of Community Development
City 115 Church Ave., P.Q. Box 1130
of Planned Development Application POh1920J436-1
Oshkosh HONE
For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan
"PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK"
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: V \Sk 3 Aa.e�.�,rr =M,&g=I L c— n �' C Date: l5 - 2 ��
Petitioner's Address: ?. O . 'Qcr x '2. 4e City: -6- *.bJ &NA State: Zip: 4A%t,
ii5C3�n�. C � �i1us `
Telephone #: (91q Q304'- 4k"SV=� Em il:^- --�• -.,'► Contact preference: ❑ Phone ❑ Email
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): er Aepresentative Tenant _ Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required): Date:��
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): IRL%.66rc: _5-40PA.r Date: Qr- 74-7s1�
Owners) Address: S S a 044�\O 4 : City: C26A SSA State: Sb!�_ Zip: I_kVz
Telephone #: (921-j Email:
Contact preference: 0 Phone ❑ Email
Ownership Status (Please Check): -: Individual Trust XPortnership Corporation
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter
upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all
meeting dotes are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other
administrative reasons,
Property Owner's Signature:
TYPE OF REQUEST:
❑ General Development Plan (GDP)
PSpec'rfic Implementation Plan (SIP)
SITE INFORMATION
Date:
1:3 General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment
❑ Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment
Address/Location of Proposed Project: 19) 6A
Proposed Project Type: 1 , r �Ag Q %
Current Use of Property:
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North:
South: ha %3 — P C>
East: GAP_ !R n
West: &%e • lfp
oning: c-t - ill
i It is recommended that the applicant meet with Pianning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal.
r Application fees are due at time of submittal, Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
i+ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
For more information please visit the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm
SIQn Staff Date Ree'd
❑ Proposed grading plan.
❑ Specific landscaping plan for the subject site, specifying the location, species. and installation size of
plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species.
❑ Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi -family structures, or building clusters, other than
conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots, in sufficient detail to indicate the floor
area, bulk, and visual character of such buildings.
o Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems, stormwater systems, roads, parking areas, and
walkways.
❑ Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs,
and group development Signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common
practices.
Specific written description of the proposed SIP including:
• Specific project themes and images.
• Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses.
• Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre,
and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity.
• Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland.
• Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets.
• Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots
and pads; density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and
landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by
Plan Commission.
• A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed. This statement shall list the standard
zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion, would inhibit the development project and the
opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project.
• A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s)
in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur.
• Phasing schedule, it more than one development phase is intended.
❑ Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the
development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common
open areas and amenities.
SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all
Li A written description that demonstrates how the
differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP.
I 'hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are Included with this
application. I am aware that failure to su mit the required completed application materials may result in denial or
delay of the application request.
Applicant's Signature (required):
Date: • 2 .'7.�J
1844 Oshkosh Avenue
Project Narrative
The project consists of two new commercial buildings. The north building is a two-story mixed use building containing first floor
retail and restaurant spaces and second floor professional office space. The second floor includes a large covered patio space that
can be utilized by the tenants and their guests. The total building area is approximately 21,516 s.f.
The south building is a single story multi -tenant retail building. The design includes a drive-thru lane for a potential coffee or similar
tenant. The total building area is approximately 7,896 s.f.
The site includes 117 parking spaces for employee and customer use. The parking lot will consist of asphalt paving with concrete
curbing. Perimeter and island landscaping are being provided to screen the parking and reduce the heat island effect from the
parking lot. Site lighting will be provide to meet the zoning ordinance.
The development takes advantage of the views of the park to the north as well as encourages pedestrian bike and foot traffic from
the trails and public ways. Bike parking is being provided near both building. Adjacent properties to the east, west and south
include similar developments providing continuity in use and public access. In addition, the proposed uses comply with the current
zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan.
We believe this development will provide a high quality amenity that the community can be proud of for many years. In addition,
the local ownership group is sure to fill the lease space with great local and national tenants that the community will enjoy.
VISION ARCHITECTURE, LLC
Adam James, AIA
Partner
P.O. Box 224
Neenah, WI 54956
www.vision-architecture.net
Siva
SNOISN3a
ON
N
d s NISNOOSIM 'HSOAHSO =10 All0
Cu zm1 ]AV HSOAHSO VVS
1N3AdM3A3G 30VdS 3AI2ld
3 _
N aOd iNdwdnoadwi diiS adSOdoad
N a
w
-
m
N
U
ozozieueo
N a3ead—d3a O❑
NIN—Nd,d
HGO-GO do ;.ilo aad GNol 1—
«o s�oso 8
z
d,
�m
=Prr__e
olt
m
�
,o
o
tz
t-
0 (9
�z�
c
U
_z
\\1bM\
mo
o °L ■� o
SEMEN
■ems
■■
i
■
■
B
IK
IN a■■e■� ■■
.
N. lCdELLER STREET
oI
Jz -CL
Q w
7Nm� -`U� o Q
ULLJ
J zz QC�
oc Q as vn- o = v% IVA'9 o s
QCnvl sc3NroH
:F,
w
z
O
U
o o U
a.pz`
a
+
w
��
w
>
w�
'z�
�O
Q ds
LLJ
CL
Q
Qz
VU
L� o Q ` uisuooslm'ysolgso Jo All)
- juawdolanaa awdS @W[Jd o
3 I I :joj juawdolanaa pasodoad
Z
L7
W
0
W
Q
Z
W
H
J
Q
z
O
H
a
w
J
w
2
H
O
U)
CITY OF OSHKOSH HIGHWAY 21 HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC LAKE SHORE DEVELOPMENT OF OSHKOSH LLC
PO BOX 1130 5108 1 AH MAY TAH RD 230 OHIO ST 200
OSHKOSH W154903 OSHKOSH W154901 OSHKOSH W154902
PRIME SPACE LLC
1325 N SUMMER RANGE RD
DEPERE W154115
PRIME SPACE DEVELOPMENT
230 OHIO ST
OSHKOSH W154902
FOX COMMUNITIES CREDIT UNION
3401 E CALUMET ST
APPLETON WI 54915
VISION ARCHITECTURE LLC
PO BOX 224
NEENAH W154956
�Jrf tSOJr�
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclai mer
N
1 in=0.03mi
1in=150ft
Printing Date: 9/14/2020
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Oshkosh
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only, and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclai mer
N
1 in=0.09mi
1 in=500ft
Printing Date: 9/14/2020
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
Oshkosh
Sr
.�r4S
Fx I S
wq K
M
e
s
1
r 'o
ti
t„
001
`i
t
kzt
� gp..
0
a
t 9
J
J:JT�jJT� �
N 1 in=0.02mi
A
1in=100ft
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification
purposes only, and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information.
Those using the
Printing Date: 9/14/2020
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full
disclaimer please go to
C
Oshkosh
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
I T,'IS1PInnninn\Plan Cnmmissinn Site Plan Man Temnlnte17n9n Plan Cnmmissinn
Site Plan Man Temnlate mvri
I
Isar kafiah