Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15. 20-351 AUGUST 12, 2020 20-351 RESOLUTION (CARRIED___6-0___LOST_______LAID OVER_______WITHDRAWN_______) PURPOSE: APPROVE SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RETAIL BUILDING TRADE DRESS AT 1650-1660 OSHKOSH AVENUE INITIATED BY: LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT OF OSHKOSH LLC PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/conditions WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the Conditional Use Permit to allow for trade dress on the retail building facades at 1650-1660 Oshkosh Avenue, is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-382(F)(3) of the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the applicant would like to amend the previously approved Specific Implementation Plan for an office and retail building at 1650-1660 Oshkosh Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the planned development amendment for various revisions to the approved site design at 1650-1660 Oshkosh Avenue is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-387(C)(6) of the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that a conditional use permit to allow for trade dress on the retail building facades at 1650-1660 Oshkosh Avenue is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. Windows and doors or other openings shall comprise at least 40% of the area on the street facing (south) facade of the retail building. 2. Overall wall sign area may not exceed 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage on any facade. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the amendment to the specific implementation plan for various revisions to the approved site design at 1650-1600 Oshkosh Avenue, per the attached, is hereby approved. r,A 6 City c)fi Oshkosh TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Mark Lyons Planning Services Manager DATE: August 6, 2020 RE: Approve Specific Implementation Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for Retail Building Trade Dress at 1650-1660 Oshkosh Avenue (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) BACKGROUND The subject site consists of a 112,884 square foot L-shaped parcel with frontage on Oshkosh Avenue and N. Westfield Street and is located within the Corporate Business Park District (CBP). On January 28, 2019, the Common Council approved a Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) for an office and retail development at the subject site. The surrounding area consists predominately of commercial uses as well as Mary Jewell Park to the east and Lakeshore Park and Oshkosh Corporation Global Headquarters to the north. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan recommends Interstate Commercial land use for the subject property. ANALYSIS There are no changes being proposed to the approved use of the site. The petitioner is proposing only minor revisions to the approved site design which include a modified drive-thru window and menu boards, reduced distance from curb to the building at the drive-thru, bollard added at the drive-thru bump out to protect the building, drive-thru menu shifted to the north, walkway on south side of the building has been angled for increased walking clearance and dumpster pad has been increased by 22 sq. ft. to meet masonry dimensions. All changes are compliant with zoning ordinance standards. The overall impervious surface percentage has been reduced from 69.1% to 69%. No changes have been made from the previously approved SIP for lighting or storm water management. No changes have been made to the approved landscaping totals for the site. However, some building foundation plantings have been shifted from the north side of the building to the east and west sides to accommodate for bike racks near the main entrance. Conceptual signage plans were included in the SIP approval and it was noted that wall signage shall be limited to 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage with a maximum of 15% of the wall area per building facade. Final plans have been included with this request for Dunkin' City Hall,215 Church Avenue P.O.Box 1130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1 130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us Donuts and Baskin Robbins wall signage on the north, south and east facades of the retail building. The proposed wall signage will consist of channel letters and is under the maximum of 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage and 15% of total facade area. The remaining retail building tenant will be limited to the additional wall sign area noted in the table above, which is inconsistent with additional signage shown for the south(75.33 sq. ft.) and north(63.56 sq. ft.) facades for future tenants. Staff is recommending a condition that each facade of the building be held to the maximum wall area allowance of 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage. Directional signs have also been included with the plans and are compliant with size/height requirements. The applicant is proposing changes to the retail building facades to provide trade dress for Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins. The CBP standards require buildings to be clad on all sides with at least 75% Class I materials and window/door area shall comprise at least 40% of the ground floor level of the street facing facade. Also, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required to allow for trade dress within the CBP district. Class I materials have been reduced on the north, south and east facades. A combination of Class III materials including colored metal banding, fiber cement panels and fiber cement siding has been included on the facade renderings. Staff is supportive of the CUP request to allow trade dress as the 75% Class I material requirement is still being met for all facades. Although the 75% Class I requirement is being met for the total facade areas, it should be noted that individual storefront areas do not meet the 75% Class I material requirement. The Dunkin' Donuts south facade storefront is approximately 53% Class I and their east facade includes two wall sections of 52-53% Class I material. In staff's opinion, the Class I reductions in these areas is not consistent with the intent of the CBP zoning district, which sought to provide a balanced appearance to all building facades. While staff is concerned with this deviation from the intent of district, the proposed elevations do technically met the code as written and therefore staff felt it important to bring it to the Plan Commissions attention. RECOMMENDATION The Plan Commission recommended approval of a Specific Implementation Plan amendment and Conditional Use Permit with findings and conditions at its August 4, 2020 meeting. Please see the attached staff report and meeting minutes for more information. Respectfully Submitted, Approved: Mark Lyons John Fitzpatri Planning Services Manager Assistant City Manager/ Director of Administrative Services City Hall,215 Church Avenue P.O.Box 1130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AMENDMENT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RETAIL BUILDING TRADE DRESS AT 1650-1660 OSHKOSH AVENUE Plan Commission meeting of August 4, 2020 GENERAL INFORMATION Owner: Steve Hoopman-Lakeshore Development of Oshkosh LLC Petitioner: Emily Kettinger-Tmart Operations I,LLC Action(s) Requested: The petitioner requests an amendment to the Specific Implementation Plan approval and Conditional Use Permit to allow for trade dress on the retail building facades. The applicant is also requesting a Base Standard Modification(BSM)to allow for reduction of window/door opening area on the street facing facade. Applicable Ordinance Provisions: Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance. Trade Dress is permitted only through a Conditional Use Permit in the Corporate Business Park District(CBP) as regulated in Section 30-59 (L) of the Zoning Ordinance. Criteria used for Conditional Use Permits are located in Section 30-382 of the Zoning Ordinance. Background Information Property Location and Type: The subject site consists of a 112,884 square foot(2.59 acre) L-shaped parcel with frontage on Oshkosh Avenue and N.Westfield Street and is located within the Corporate Business Park District(CBP). On January 28,2019, the Common Council approved a Specific Implementation Plan(SIP) for an office and retail development at the subject site. The surrounding area consists predominately of commercial uses as well as Mary Jewell Park to the east and Lakeshore Park and Oshkosh Corporation Global Headquarters to the north. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan recommends Interstate Commercial land use for the subject property. Subject Site Existing Land Use Zoning Vacant(office/retail to be constructed) CBP-PD Adjacent Land Use and Zoning Existing Uses Zoning North Park I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. South Commercial NMU ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. East Park I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. West Commercial/vacant CBP-PD Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use 2040 Land Use Recommendation Interstate Commercial ANALYSIS Use The previously approved SIP(2019) for the site included both an office and retail building. No changes are being proposed to the approved use of the site. Site Design&Access/Parking The petitioner is proposing only minor revisions to the approved site design which include the following: - Modified drive-thru window and menu boards - Reduced distance from curb to the building at the drive-thru - Bollard added at the drive-thru bump out to protect the building - Drive-thru menu shifted to the north - Walkway on south side of the building has been angled for increased walking clearance - Dumpster pad has been increased by 22 sq.ft. to meet masonry dimensions Staff does not have concerns with the proposed site modifications as all changes are compliant with zoning ordinance standards. The overall impervious surface percentage has been reduced from 69.1%to 69%. Lighting No changes have been made from the approved SIP. Siege Conceptual signage plans were included in the SIP approval and it was noted that wall signage shall be limited to 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage with a maximum of 15%of the wall area per building facade. Final plans have been included with this request for Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins wall signage on the north, south and east facades of the retail building. Proposed Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Additional wall Facade Fa ade Len th Robbins wall signage sign area allowed South 101 ft. 57.35 sq. ft. 43.65 sq. ft. North 101 ft. 57.35 sq. ft. 43.65 sq. ft. East 64.66 ft. 60.23 sq. ft. 4.43 sq. ft. West 64.66 ft. None provided 64.66 sq. ft. The proposed wall signage will consist of channel letters and is under the maximum of 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage and 15%of total facade area. The remaining retail building tenant will be limited to the additional wall sign area noted in the table above,which is inconsistent with additional signage shown for the south (75.33 sq.ft.) and north(63.56 sq. ft.) facades for future tenants. Staff is recommending a condition that each facade of the building be held to the maximum wall area allowance of 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage. ITEM-SIPAmendinent&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 2 Directional signs have also been included with the plans and are compliant with size/height requirements. Landscaping No changes have been made to the approved landscaping totals for the site. However, some building foundation plantings have been shifted from the north side of the building to the east and west sides to accommodate for bike racks near the main entrance. Staff does not have concerns as only the south building foundation has a minimum point requirement,which is still being met. Storm Water Management No changes to the storm water management plan are being proposed. Building Facades The applicant is proposing changes to the retail building facades to provide trade dress for Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins. The Corporate Business Park (CBP) standards require buildings to be clad on all sides with at least 75%Class I materials and window/door area shall comprise at least 40%of the ground floor level of the street facing facade. Also, a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) is required to allow for trade dress within the CBP district. The specific elevations breakdown is as follows: Required Class I Provided Class I SIP (2019)Provided Class I North 75% 92% 100% South 75% 87% 100% East 75% 75% 100% West 75% 100% 100% Street facing ground floor (south 40% door/window area 38%glass 41% glass facade) k sirauc� SnNAM oN EXTERIOR SOUTH-STREET FACING S'eo -r [i vp8u�p�vw[ rlrlKru4k 'r rie i nwrtvn�i aarr.r...nM. BR RUNKI SIGNAGE rren: wne � a E emu. EXTERIOR NORTH-ENTRANCE ITEM-SIPAmendinent&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 3 WON ua,c reo �r EXTERIOR EAST-DRIVE T14RU EXTERIOR WEST Class I materials have been reduced on the north, south and east facades. A combination of Class III materials including colored metal banding, fiber cement panels and fiber cement siding has been included on the facade renderings. Staff is supportive of the CUP request to allow trade dress as the 75% class I material requirement is still being met for all facades. Although the 75%Class I requirement is being met for the total facade areas, it should be noted that individual storefront areas do not meet the 75%Class I material requirement. The Dunkin Donuts south faigade storefront is approximately 53%Class I and their east faigade includes two wall sections of 52-53%Class I material. In staff's opinion, the Class I reductions in these areas is not consistent with the intent of the CBP zoning district,which sought to provide a balanced appearance to all building facades. While staff is concerned with this deviation from the intent of district, the proposed elevations do technically met the code as written and therefore staff felt it important to bring it to the Plan Commission's attention. A Base Standard Modification(BSM) is being requested to allow reduction of window/door area on the street facing (south)faigade to 38%where code requires 40%. The applicant is proposing to raise the parapets to screen the rooftop HVAC units while the square footage of glass remains the same as previously approved. However, staff is not supportive of this requested BSM as the applicant has the option of increasing the window area to comply with the 40%window/door area requirement. FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6): (a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose and intent of this Chapter. (b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to determine such consistency.) (c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts in the environs of the subject site. (g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development. ITEM-SIPAmendinent&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 4 In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Conditional Use Permit, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-382(17)(3): (1) Is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Would not result in a substantial or undue adverse impact on nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, environmental factors, traffic factors, parking, public improvements, public property or rights-of-way, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, or general welfare. (5) The potential public benefits outweigh any potential adverse impacts of the proposed conditional use, after taking into consideration the applicant's proposal and any requirements recommended by the applicant to ameliorate such impacts. Staff recommends approval of the Specific Implementation Plan amendment and Conditional Use Permit as proposed with the findings listed above and following conditions: (1) Windows and doors or other openings shall comprise at least 40% of the area on the street facing(south) facade of the retail building. (2) Overall wall sign area may not exceed 1 sq. ft. per linear foot of building frontage on any facade. The Plan Commission approved of the Specific Implementation Plan amendment and Conditional Use Permit as requested with findings and conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item. Site Inspections Report: Mr.Hinz and Ms. Propp reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The petitioner requests an amendment to the Specific Implementation Plan approval and Conditional Use Permit to allow for trade dress on the retail building facades. The applicant is also requesting a Base Standard Modification(BSM)to allow for reduction of window/door opening area on the street facing facade. Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. On January 28,2019, the Common Council approved a Specific Implementation Plan for an office and retail development. The petitioner is proposing only minor revisions to the approved site design which include a modified drive- thru window and menu boards,reduced distance from curb to the building at the drive-thru, bollard added at the drive-thru bump out to protect the building, drive-thru menu shifted to the north,walkway on south side of the building has been angled for increased walking clearance and dumpster pad has been increased by 22 sq. ft. to meet masonry dimensions. There will be no changes to the use, lighting, landscaping and storm water management. Included with this request are the Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins final plans for wall signage on the north, south and east facades of the retail building. The applicant meets all Class I material requirements for all facades but is deficient in windows and doors or other openings. He said ITEM-SIPAmendmenl&CUR 1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 5 staff recommends approval of the Specific Implementation Plan amendment and Conditional Use Permit with the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Lyons commented staff is recommending approval because the plan is code compliant though it may not meet the intent of the code. He stated staff has a couple concerns. He said the first concern is about the signage because it is a little disproportionate. He said he wanted to make sure Plan Commission was aware that staff would not be in support of increasing the signage for the future tenants. He said the second concern was the building facade because it is disproportionate as well. He explained the code states 75%Class I materials for the entire building which the plan meets but the individual units do not meet the 75%requirement. Ms. Propp opened technical questions to staff. Mr.Perry said the narrative states the items the applicant is requesting are simply going to go over the required building materials. He commented there is a potential in switching out the items should the business move out. Mr. Lyons explained how the orange banding was going to be installed onto the building but said he was not sure how the fiber cement was going to be installed. Mr.Perry agreed there needs to be more explanation of how the signage would be installed. He stated his concern is that while it is one building, in the future it could be sold off as business condos. He said then they would have one of those condos that would be noncompliant for a future use. Ms. Davey asked if Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins were the same corporation. Mr. Lyons said he would defer that question to the applicant. Ms. Propp asked if Dunkin' Donuts was the drive-thru or not. Mr. Lyons replied it was the drive-thru. He pointed out on the site plan the building locations. Ms. Davey inquired about the submitted building elevations. Mr. Lyons clarified where each side of the building facade faced. Ms. Propp opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Mario Valentin(applicant), 5105 Tollview Drive in Rolling Meadows, IL, said he is with MRV Architects. He said he appreciates the opportunity to come in front of the Commission. He explained the tenant space is a rectangular space and that both brands would be occupy the space. He said there is no divider between the two and it would be a cohesive space. He explained that is the reason the elevations do not show a separation. He explained the parent company to Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins is a company called Dunkin Brands. He gave ITEM-SIPAmendinent&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 6 a brief overview of Dunkin' Brands and how they franchise all their locations. He explained the building would go up with no branding of any type. He said the materials would be applied onto the building with the thought that the materials could be easily removed if Dunkin' Donuts or Baskin Robbins were to move out of that space. He said the goal is to use certain elements to identify the brand as if it were a free standing building. He said he understands the staff report and staff's concerns. He explained why the fiber cement was used. He said in speaking with the franchisee and the Brand, they would like to see the Baskin Robbins sign as shown but are willing to reduce it to just show the BR. He requested that the additional signage be only allowed for the Baskin Robbins' sign and no other tenant could use the additional square footage if Baskin Robbins were to vacate. Ms. Davey asked Mr. Lyons how many units there were. Mr. Lyons replied the way it is shown,it looks like three overall units. He said typically the code would divide up the signage to around 34 square feet of signage per unit space for the roughly 101 feet of frontage. Mr.Hinz asked if Plan Commission had the authority do to what the applicant is requesting. Mr. Lyons answered it is a Planned Development and Plan Commission does have quite a bit of flexibility. He said as staff,he would recommend against it because their primary concern is the 101 feet of frontage versus the square feet of the signage. Mr.Hinz said it seems like Plan Commission is doing the landlord's job. He stated it is the landlord's job to work with the tenants on how much signage each will be allowed to have. Mr.Valentin explained the unit frontage is 36 feet wide which would give 36 square feet of signage. He said the Dunkin' Donuts sign would be 35 square feet and the Baskin Robbins sign would be 9.16 square feet. He said with the reduction of the Baskin Robbins' sign, it would also reduce the background which would get the percentage for Class I materials closer to the requirement. He explained the intent is to use standardized signage which will still be easy to read from a distance. Ms. Propp questioned with the reduction the Baskin Robbins if it would still leave adequate signage for the remaining tenants. Mr.Valentin said with reducing the Baskin Robbins sign to just the BR, it would still put them over by 8-9 square feet. Ms. Propp said it would short the other tenants' signage by 8-9 square feet. Mr.Valentin explained they would like to not approach it that way. He said they would like the BR signage to stand alone and that it would not fall against the restrictions for the landlord. Mr. Lyons explained further the applicant is essentially requesting a Base Standard Modification for roughly 10 more square feet of signage than what code allows. ITEM-SIP Amendment&CUR 1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 7 Mr.Perry said he appreciates the dilemma that is caused by this with the co-mingling of like businesses. He stated ultimately he sees this as being Mr. Hoopman and his partners' problem to negotiate the tenant spaces and their allowable signage. Mr.Kiefer commented it has been made clear that staff is not going to recommend approval of a variance for increased signage. Mr. Ford agreed that it goes beyond Plan Commission's role and it should be a landlord's decision to make. He said the materials meet the code even if the intent was to treat it as three different buildings,Plan Commission still has to go by the letter of the law as staff did. He asked Mr.Valentin if there would be an issue getting the south facade to 41%from 38%for Class I materials. Mr.Valentin replied he does not see an issue with it. He explained more about the tenant and landlord situation and said he understands what Plan Commission and staff's thoughts are. He said ultimately,he is asking for Plan Commission approval so the landlord will not restrict the signage space. Mr. Lyons commented Plan Commission has the authority to grant a Base Standard Modification if they choose to. Mr. Ford asked for clarification of the request. Mr.Valentin clarified he is only asking for increased signage for the Baskin Robbins' signage not for the entire building. Mr. Ford asked staff if there was currently any violation to the code. Mr. Lyons replied currently there is not because it is the only signage on the building. He explained the concern is with the future tenants who may want more signage because other tenants have more than they do. He went over some of the options for Plan Commission. He inquired about how the letters were affixed because that would make a difference in the calculations. Mr.Valentin said there are details included in the packet. He explained they are individual letters which are mounted to the face and each letter would have its own electric feed. Mr. Lyons explained how individually mounted letters are calculated differently. He said with the Dunkin' and BR signage being individually mounted, the signage may be closer to code than originally calculated. Mr.Valentin stated they are trying to do the work for the landlord so there won't be any issues for the future tenants. ITEM-SIPAmendinent&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 8 Mr.Hinz inquired about what the new calculations would be. He said with his experience installing signs,he suggested customizing the sign to fit into the space. Mr.Valentin said he understands there can be customized signs but stated this presentation is about everything as a whole not just the signage. He explained how brands make their signs. Mr. Ford stated he does not see this as a contentious issue because there are no other tenants yet. Mr.Hinz added the signage has already been reduced due to the individually mounted letters. Mr. Perry commented the third tenant's branding may be a small sign. Mr.Valentin explained his point of view on the signage again. Mr. Ford questioned why the applicant has to make a Base Standard Modification request for something that is not currently an issue and meets code. Mr. Lyons explained it is code compliant and nothing needs to be changed but wanted to ensure Plan Commission, the owner and the applicant were aware that it may be an issue down the line for the third tenant. He said Plan Commission does not have to do a Base Standard Modification. There were no other public comments on this item. Ms. Propp closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. Mr.Valentin thanked everyone for letting them present their request. He said their client is anxious to be a part of the community. Motion by Hinz to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Conditions: I. Windows and doors or other openings shall comprise at least 40% of the area on the street facing(south)facade of the retail building. 2. Overall wall sign area may not exceed I sq.ft. per linear foot of building frontage on any facade. Seconded by Kiefer. Ms. Propp asked if there was any discussion on the motion. Mr. Ford inquired about condition#2 and how it compared to what is in the code. ITEM-SIPAmendinent&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 9 Mr. Lyons stated it is what is in the code. He explained it is added to reinforce the code. Mr. Slusarek added it is helpful to staff for future requests to the site. Mr. Lyons said it is also because the submitted elevation show signage that exceeds 101 square feet. Motion carried 8-0. ITEM-SIPAmenlment&CUP-1650-1660 Oshkosh Ave. 10 r i C SUBMIT TO: ty of Oshkosh Dept,of Community Development Oi 215 Church Ave.,P.O.Box 1 130 O�% Planned Development Application Oshkosh,WI 54901 shkosh PHONE:(920)236-5059 For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan "PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK** APPLICANT INFORMATION Emily Kettinger-TMart Operations I, LLC Petitioner: _ Date: 06/24/20 Petitioner's Address: P.O Box 120 City: Wisconsin Dells State: WI Zip: 53965 Telephone #: (608 ) 9$w616-5 Email: ekettinger.dunkin@gn,ail.com Contact preference: ■ Phone ■Email Status of Petitioner(Please Check): ' Owner F Representative ■Tenant -- Prospective Buyer Petitioner's Signature (required) � Development Manager TMart Operations I.LLCDate:.6-24-2020 OWNER INFORMATION Owner(s): Steve Hoopman-Lake Shore Development of Oshkosh LLC Date:06/19/20 Owner(s) Address: 230 Ohio St suite 200 City: Oshkosh State: WI Zip: 54902 Telephone #: ( 920) 216 1083 Email- Hoopmans@fistweber.com Contact preference: ❑ Phone ❑ Email Ownership Status (Please Check): 2 Individual Trust ■Partnership 'J Corporation Property Owner Consent:(required) By signature hereon,I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions,enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative and may b postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: Date: 6' TYPE OF REQUEST. ❑ General Development Plan (GDP) ■ General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment ❑Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) ■Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment SITE INFORMATION Address/Location of Proposed Project: Oshkosh Ave Proposed Project Type: New Construction of Office and Retail-Dunkin'/Baskin Robbins Build-out Current Use of Property: Vacant Land 7oning: CBP-PD Pending Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: Industrial-Park South: Neighborhood Mixed Use-Daycare East: industrial-Park West: Commercial Business Park Planned Development-Commercial ➢ It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal. ➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal.Make check payable to City of Oshkosh. ➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE I-or more Intormation please visit the City's website at www.cl.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm Sign Staff Date Rec'd SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS -Must accompany the application to be complete. (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy) The following information must be provided in order for the application to be considered complete and able to be scheduled for Plan Commission Review. Please use the checklist below to determine the required information to be submitted at the time of application. If all information below cannot be provided at the time of application, please request a waiver in writing to the Division's Director or designee. ■ A General Development Plan (GDP)submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(4),shall include the following items (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy): N General location map of the subject site depicting: • All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject property. • Current zoning of the subject site and abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that control. • A graphic scale and north arrow. LiGeneralized site plan showing the pattern or proposed land uses, including: • General size,shape, and arrangement of lots and specific use areas. • Basic street pattern and pattern of internal drives. ■ General site grading plan showing preliminary road grades. • Basic storm drainage pattern, including proposed on-site stormwater detention. • General location of recreational and open space areas,including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space. ❑ Statistical data, including: • Minimum lot sizes in the development. Approximate areas of all lots. • Density/intensity of various parts of the development. • Building coverage. • Landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses. • Expected staging. ❑ Conceptual landscaping plan. ■ General signage plan. ❑ General outline of property owners association, covenants, easements, and deed restrictions. ❑ A written description of the proposed Planned Development, including: • General project themes and images. • The general mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses. • Approximate residential densities and nonresidential intensities. • General treatment of natural features. • General relationship to nearby properties and public streets. • General relationship of the project to the Comprehensive Plan or other area plans. • Proposed exceptions from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. ❑ Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA),if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning Services, or designee. ■ A Specific Implementation Plan (SIP)submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(5),shall include the following items. Note that the area included in an SIP may be only a portion of the area included in a previously approved GDP (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy): ❑ An existing conditions map of the subject site depicting the following: • All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject site. • Current zoning of the subject property and all abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that control. • Existing utilities and recorded easements. • All lot dimensions of the subject site. • A graphic scale and a north arrow. ❑ An SIP map of the proposed site showing at least the following: • Lot layout and the arrangements of buildings. • Public and private roads, driveways,walkways, and parking facilities. • Specific treatment and location of recreational and open space areas,including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space. 2 ❑ Proposed grading plan. ❑ Specific landscaping plan for the subject site, specifying the location,species, and installation size of plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species. ❑ Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi-family structures, or building clusters, other than conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots, in sufficient detail to indicate the floor area, bulk, and visual character of such buildings. ❑ Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems,stormwater systems,roads, parking areas, and walkways. ■ Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs, and group development signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common practices. ❑ Specific written description of the proposed SIP including: • Specific project themes and images. • Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses. • Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre, and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity. • Specific treatment of natural features, including parkland. • Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets. • Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development, the precise areas of all development lots and pads; density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by Plan Commission. • A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed.This statement shall list the standard zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion,would inhibit the development project and the opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project. • A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the location(s) in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur. • Phasing schedule, if more than one development phase is intended. LiAgreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common open areas and amenities. ❑ A written description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are included with this application. I am aware that failure to submit the required completed application materials may result in denial or delay of the application request. 6-24-2020 Applicant's Signature (required): ,1� Date: 3 SUBMIT TO: City of Oshkosh Application Dept,of Community Development C,iy 215 Church Ave.,P.O.Box H30 Conditional Use Permit Oshkosh,Wisconsin54903-1130 Oshkosh PHONE:(920)236-5059 -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK-- APPLICANT INFORMATION Petitioner: Emily Kettinaer-TMart Operations I; LLC Date: 06/24/20 Petitioner's Address: P.O Box 120 City: Wisconsin Dells State: WI Zip: 53965 Telephone #: (608) 698-6165 Email: ekettinger.dunkin@gmail.com Contact preference: r Phone ■Email Status of Petitioner (Please Check): = Owner - Representative ■Tenant l Prospective Buyer Petitioner's Signature (required): Development Man r T ion LLQ Date: 6/24/2020 OWNER INFORMATION Owner(s): Steve Hoopman- Lake Shore Development of Oshkosh LLC Date: 06/19/20 Owner(s) Address: 230 Ohio St suite 200 City: Oshkosh State:WI Zip: 54902 Telephone #: (920) 216 1083 Email: Hoopmans@fistweber.com Contact preference: ■Phone ■ Email Ownership Status (Please Check): _: Individual r I Trust N Partnership __Corporation Property Owner Consent:(required) By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: Date: SITE INFORMATION Address/Location of Proposed Project: Oshkosh Ave Proposed Project Type: New Construction of Office and Retail- Dunkin'/Baskin Robbins Build-out Current Use of Property: Vacant Land :Zoning: CBP-PD Pending Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: Industrial-Park South: Neighborhood Mixed Use- Daycare East: Industrial -Park West: Commercial Business Park Planned Development-Commercial *"Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request. ➢ It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal. ➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh. ➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE For more information please the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm Sign Staff Date Rec'd Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use will not have a negative effect on the issues below. l. Health,safety,and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Revisions will have no change to effect of previous approved design. 2. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation and safety. Revisions will have no change to effect of previous approved design. I 3. Noise,air,water,or other forms of environmental pollution. Revisions will have no change to effect of previous approved design_ 4. The demand for and availability of public services and facilities. Revisions will have no change to effect of previous approved design. 5. Character and future development of the area. Revisions will have no change to effect of previous approved design. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS —Must accompany the application to be complete. (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy) ➢ A narrative of the proposed conditional use and project including: ❑ Proposed use of the property ❑ Existing use of the property ❑ Identification of structures on the property and discussion of their relation to the project ❑ Projected number of residents, employees,and/or daily customers ❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units,floor area, landscape area,and parking area expressed in square feet and acreage to the nearest one-hundredth of an acre ❑ Effects on adjoining properties to include: noise,hours of operation,glare,odor,fumes,vibration, etc. ❑ Surrounding land uses ❑ Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent and other properties in the area. ❑ Traffic generation ■ Any other information pertinent to adequate understanding of the intended use and its relation to nearby properties ➢ A complete site plan including: ■ Digital plans and drawings of the project ■ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner,if different ■ Full name and contact information of petitioner's engineers/surveyors/architects,or other design professionals used in the plan preparation ■ The date of the original plan and latest date of revision to the plan ■ A north arrow and graphic scale. Said scale is not to be smaller than one inch equals sixty feet (1"=60') unless otherwise approved by the Department of Community Development prior to submittal ■ All property lines and existing and proposed right-of-way lines with bearings and dimensions clearly labeled ■ All required building setback and offset lines ■ All existing and proposed buildings,structures,and paved areas,including building entrances,walks,drives,decks, patios,fences,walls ❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for construction ❑ Location and dimension of all on-site parking (and off-site parking provisions if they are to be employed),including a summary of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30-175 City of Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance ❑ Location and dimension of all loading and service areas on the subject property ❑ Location, height, design,illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the property including a photometrics plan ❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where applicable (i.e.visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechnnicnl equipment includes, but is not limited to;HVAC equipment,electrical transformers and boxes, exhaust flues, plumbing vents,gas regulators, generators 2 ffLN F ARCHITECTS , INC . 5105 Tollview Dr., Suite 197, Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 Ph. (224) 318-2140 Email: ErikV@mrvarch.com July 01, 2020 Dunkin/Baskin Robbins Exterior Renovation—Planning Commission Revisions 1650 Oshkosh,WI 54902 Oshkosh,WI 54902 In order to better identify their brand,Dunkin' Donuts is proposing the addition new exterior finishes to their portion of the new proposed multi-tenant building. The design has been adjusted to include items as fiber cement panel/sidings at the southeast corner,drive thru bump out,and behind all signage. The material will be applied over brick where construction and cost find applicable for possible future removal for possible future tenants. The orange accent beam/canopy/awnings would be installed in this same manner.Parapet design at the corner has been altered to further reflect Dunkin's newest protype design with its charcoal banding wrap around its primary street facing signage. Due to the raising of the parapets to screen the roof top HVAC units,the percentage of glass on the street face has decreased to 38%. The square footage of glass has remained the same as previously approved. We would request a variation from the 40%zoning requirement. The Dunkin' signage surface area has remained the same or be reduced at the original proposed locations. Some these signage's design has been altered or been replaced with Baskin Robbins signage. An additional sign will be proposed along the north facade in order to properly represent to customers the location's services. The Site plan has also been revised since latest approval and included the following updates. The drive thru window type and location was modified and the distance from the curb to the building at the drive thru reduced. A bollard will be added at the drive thru bump out to protect the building. The drive thru menu board was changed and shifted to the north. Concrete pads were shown at the drive thru to allow for the appropriate under slab sensors. Directional site signs have been added. The south sidewalk was angled to allow more walking clearance the building bump out. The dumpsters were changed from 20'-0"x 11'-6"to 21'-0"x 12'-0"to meet masonry dimensions.revised slightly to meet masonry dimensions. Landscaping was adjusted to accommodate the bike racks. The impervious table was revised to show the minimal impact of the listed revisions. N �xaa= I a mo Un 3E W a88m m� 8•>" m a W m W w H. Z r U w FS SG rcz W, pas , iW p �50 -L N s s a a _ S'L cL B'L oS S'a e L Z �Y� o W �-"• "'•�� �a (j£ME u£arE UEarE use ee xmm min F� 3ry 43 m W any u i LJio. �ao rnrc� Mu madg b S 29'44'47"E�40s.00' 6 ` s {$ `g •; a� Ana _ a NN 29'41 Qjis c ?u I � — w z I ' aQz t s O PI a All- 1 •1 n.60' 4< 227.03' ❑ g S 28'28'07"E 356.63'° erg:\'" NORTH WESTnEL0 STREET qq nxn^ S 28'28 07 E ]2. 114.71' 210.38' a w d z I 0 an a'asti9ion��\hrui n 3\ 1b99—g�� (Z9Z) 960�S IM 'Puee ISGM 'IaaJIS u!SuOOS!M ZZL DTI'DNRIJ-NIDN',I INVfI0 § § 2 = 0 - q -___- \ E § � f �)°�� \ �) �■ : i _ r ■ 2 «. $ 2 t9 . ` � ■ . • � � ^� 3 ir k } LL - ~ - _ -- CD T , - m - - - S W.&_ _-_ _ - cl , --- \ _, ) 0 2! :! 72 &w !©\ - - - � f\§7 )° 2 zLO _ a \ G ) \a. /! /k 0 ) ■■ 2 l_ _ da \ df w 7: \� )>/ !/ ol z LLJ � e=5 _ o e2fz = » # \\E \\\\\ ) %gf ° � 2 \z \ LU U)20- m \ ®s ! / \ \j§� ©a, } �3 a, 2 0 .0A- fN op M / CD _ / \ § \ \ - - - D - \ \ } } \ - \ F— - jy ; § I § < \ \ Lu oo� CD- \ ) \ \ \ \ 12 e§ : z � ® g \r \ P ; # sk ) ! 2@ ) & ® - & 2 } § E : g2b2 » k § � - / 2_ ) : % » } ; / RGG t � y / / g ® / � ` ® § / / - ! _ §_ _ §_ � . s . � � i ; § \ / . 2 @ \ : , \ : 6 .6c, 2 3 § j §§ \ [ C0 § \ \ 2 z U) r ---- g � ® m w 2 2 z 2 / 3 « S 06 3 w g ) ® 2 7 \ 9 ... TLUD } / m 2 e ® O > / / w = r » m = } z \ / c z \ R ) \ \ \\U «: { �G(/ / j )\0t / 2\\ j CO222G ° ' (Dr> \ \ \+\\ G > 2 0 \ \ §S P ° - Ir � � zWLLOQ_ E \ _ / ®>- � � c ` § 131 ci » � � N ) CDco \ § \ \ -_ / - - � - \ F— - jy ; § / 4 > o \ ( \ I § < \ \ Lu oo� CZD- \ ) \ \ \ \ 12 e§ : zZ ® g \r \ 0 ; # sk ) ! 2@ ) & ® - & 2 } § E : g2b2 » k § � - / 2_ ) » } ; / RGG t � g ® / � ` ® § - ! _ §_ _ §_ � . s . � � i ; § \ / . 2 @ \ : , \ 66 .6 K 2 3 § j §§ \ [ C0 2 O / 2 (D (D m m / w 2 _ 06 ƒ z \ / ¥ ? U _ . \ \ q cl j - ° ELu 9 / m @ ® O O r g / ) - e w = r » m _ [LU a } / \ { f § _ e � . \ / [(\ aj j yU ) ° L)0 \ }}[t L u \ j 2\\ / 222G z)4} ( \ \+\\ ® j LU _0\/ p / /\§j / ° - J - w ° LL \ ci :23 2 � Wk Q U W I � Mv a g � eo s Z U 2 s 3E zQ6gzma = O Z'" tl z W W a3oWi Z Wow 'lry on.g: o m>�s � W� x all, S a�aa, e� mm p$gg5Wm'��a,� W5$ .s -sees HAM NZ �-M%ZAMAlg iso �I 3 S S't m g S C S S a a I I j V V 5 294]V E 0 019 KH '44' JI T �� I I "d 2 s r � t b b a Auto— � g � Iu I n ^ � •X/G—- — AT�WI" F ZI I r �V muN wm i�W Ti--� l l j l ® 3 28'28'0]"E }Sfi.fi}'x1vx3 5�aaaxoa'x I sal I < �= NORTH WESTFIELD STREET SHl—F—Wl—Wl—SW—S- SW—SWAN W—W—W—SW—S�N�SAN SN3—SW—® 12"WA7 m WAT 12"WA7 Ai 12"WA7—WAT 12'V�1' WAiW ')MC[*3Sd9[0Md\6I-M-Ml\ 1b99—g�� (Z9Z) 960�S IM 'Puee ISGM 'leeJIS uisuOOs!m ZZL D-1VDNRIA-NIDN',1lNVfl0 NeXN :S(3N"ewmNna ms »+mHSO > 3AV HSOMSOv: ui _ � ammwwaGNNN Ll/ � &mmomme&�m W < . . ƒ$ L / ¥*o Aygao�ag . § � > � )) y § , e§/ W ; ~ 2y - !)! $ ! § e.w ` ) !_,\ ) w . \ LU _ \ \ } ® » �~ ` , ■ § [ ( 2! ■ ~ \ g \ i §\ E ; _§. S; « . [ ) ( j} J } ■ . $ \\ } \ \ } \\ � [ ]` §! E ( / \ § ) `\ }) \\ )\§ \\ % \ SIP AMENDMT/CUP CASEYS MARKETING CO CITY OF OSHKOSH 1650-1660 OSHKOSH AVE 1 SE CONVENIENCE BLVD PO BOX 1130 PC:08-04-20 ANKENY IA 50021 OSHKOSH WI 54903 ELIZ B DAVIS CHILDRENS HOME HIGHWAY 21 HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC OSHKOSH CORPORATION PO BOX 2448 51081 AH MAY TAH RD PO BOX 2566 OSHKOSH WI 54903 OSHKOSH WI 54901 OSHKOSH WI 54903 LAKE SHORE DEVELOPMENT OF OSHKOSH LLC TMART OPERATIONS I LLC 230 OHIO ST 200 ATTN:EMILY KETTINGER OSHKOSH WI 54902 PO BOX 120 WISCONSIN DELLS WI 53965 m N V Y� JQ` �O p�321 p p0 b8 aaa bb. 10 00, oo. 7j439 Abb ASb 'l8 236. rn Z'6 235.0' �0 1g66�A9b. rn. CD N M b bb a33aa ��� 1 r N J:�r11SJ�rI Al � 1 in=0.02mi 1in= 120ft ^FA City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and a f the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the y Printing Date:7/7/2020 information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Oshkosh �i� �f '�+ www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh,WI C:\Users\minak\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User.minak I��E. 1111111\�= SUBJECT n : 011nn SITE Millijp 111\ <<L F11� Ii� � ■ � MM MR-2 ' n r • __ __ __ bw ' - . 1 ' 111 WN nn 1 in 0.09 mi 11 ft In City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the - Printing D. 1 1 information are responsible for ver . accuracy. Fordisclaimer please •. to r. F.. Y7 �a a ;k w Talk F m I �� I r Nmi 01JJ0-j'] ��0 JJr� K9 F r��l� tin=0.02 tin= 100ft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the Printing Date:7/7/2020 Oshkosh information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to �J hh l www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh,WI nS hLsl C:\Users\minak\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User:minak