HomeMy WebLinkAbout04. 20-327
JULY 28, 2020 20-327 RESOLUTION
CARRIED___7-0__LOST_______LAID OVER________WITHDRAWN________)
PURPOSE: APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & SPECIFIC
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN APPROVAL FOR A PERSONAL
STORAGE FACILITY FOR PROPERTIES (3 PARCELS) LOCATED
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF JACKSON STREET AND W.
FERNAU AVENUE
INITIATED BY: JARED VAN LANEN
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/conditions
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan for the proposed planned development for a personal
storage facility for properties located at the Northeast corner of Jackson Street and W.
Fernau Avenue, is consistent with the criteria established in Section 30-387(6) of the
Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for the
personal storage facility for properties located at the Northeast corner of Jackson Street
and W. Fernau Avenue, per the attached, is hereby approved with the following
conditions:
1. BSM to allow the use: personal storage facility on a BP-PD-zoned parcel.
2. BSM to allow Class IV materials on only the east façade of Building A.
3. Class IV cladding materials shall not be permitted on the west, south and north
facades of Building A.
4. Applicant shall install at least 300 landscaping points of year-round landscaping
along the east façade of Building A.
5. Applicant shall install at a minimum one (1) planter island meeting code
requirements in the parking area east of Building A so that no more than 180
linear feet are between landscaping areas.
JULY 28, 2020
20-327 RESOLUTION
CONT'D
6. Applicant shall install a six (6) foot tall solid fence between the north fagade of
Building A and the plantings in the bufferyard along the north edge of the site.
7. For Buildings B, C, D and E, at least 15% of the fagade area for each street facing
fagade shall consist of brick matching the brick used on Building A.
8. Lot combination shall occur prior to permit issuance.
9. Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan for Department of Community
Development review and approval.
10. Applicant shall submit a revised code -compliant photometric plan for
Department of Community Development review approval.
11. All on -building and freestanding signage shall meet ordinance standards.
r,A
Oshkosh
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
DATE: July 23, 2020
RE: Approve General Development Plan & Specific Implementation Plan for a
Personal Storage Facility for Properties (3 parcels) Located at the Northeast
Corner of Jackson Street and W. Femau Avenue (Plan Commission Recommends
Approval)
BACKGROUND
The subject area consists of 3 parcels of 28,000 sq. ft., 49,500 sq. ft. and 102,300 sq. ft. that were
previously used for residential purposes. The parcels are located along the Jackson Street
corridor on the northeast corner of Jackson Street and W. Fernau Avenue. One of the parcels
has a deteriorating single family home according to the applicant. The applicant's plans
include demolition of this home. The surrounding area consists of mixed residential,
commercial and industrial uses. The subject parcels are zoned Business Park with a Planned
Development Overlay (BP -PD) and the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan recommends
Industrial land use for the subject property and surrounding properties to the north and east
and Mixed Use to the west and south.
The applicant came before the Plan Commission at workshops that were held at the December
3rd, 2019 and January 21st, 2020 Plan Commission meetings. At the workshops, the applicant
explained his overall plans for the subject parcels. Staff had further discussions with the
applicant and explained that a zone change for the subject parcels was the first step in the
redevelopment process. The Plan Commission and Common Council approved a zone change
to allow a Planned Development overlay for the three subject parcels at the May 19th, 2020
and June 9th, 2020 meeting respectively.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan
(GDP/SIP) to allow a personal storage facility that includes five new buildings on the subject
site. The two-story westernmost building is approximately 24,000 sq. ft. includes offices, a call
center, climate controlled storage units, a restroom, an elevator, heating and cooling. The four
buildings to the east are single story personal storage facilities because personal storage facility
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://w .ci.oshkosh.wi.us
is not a permitted land use on a BP -zoned parcel, a Base Standard Modification (BSM) is required
to allow the proposed use. The proposed development would have a single access drive from
W. Fernau Avenue on the south edge of the site. The 12 parking spaces proposed significantly
exceed the 4 spaces required based on the largest employee shift on-site. The total proposed
impervious surface area for the site is 67.53% of the lot area. The proposed site plan meets
setback requirements for the BP District for both the building and paved area locations. The
Department of Public Works will require finalized storm water management plans as part of the
Site Plan Review process. The applicant will need to submit a revised landscaping plan and a
revised code -compliant photometric plan for Department of Community Development review
and approval. All on -building and freestanding signage shall meet ordinance standards.
Commercial building design standards require facades to consist of at least 50% Class I
materials. The standards prohibit the use of Class IV materials on commercial facades. Staff has
discussed the proposed elevations with the applicant and explained that in exchange for
permitting the land use (a personal storage facility on a BP -zoned parcel), the commercial design
standards would apply for Building A. The applicant has requested a BSM to permit the use of
Class IV materials (ribbed steel paneling) on the east elevation.
Staff is not supportive of the requested BSM to permit the use of Class IV materials unless the
applicant greatly enhances the building foundation landscaping along the east facade of
Building A. The personal storage facility is not a permitted land use on a BP -zoned parcel and
the property is located along Jackson Street on a prominent corridor leading into the city. The
requirement that the project meet the commercial design standards is a means to justify the BSM
required for the land use. Currently, the east elevation does not meet code and the applicant
does not provide enough landscaping points to justify the requested BSM. Staff discussed with
the applicant the possibility of widening the planting areas adjacent to Building A to
accommodate more robust landscaping and additional point totals. The applicant stated that
this would interfere with the turning radii for some of the semi -truck traffic he anticipates on-
site.
The mini -warehousing buildings located to the east of Building A would include steel paneling
and staff would support allowing these buildings to meet the Industrial Design Standards since
these buildings are located on the east side of the site and off of the main corridor. The buildings
have to include at least 15% Class I materials on their street facing facades. Currently the
buildings employ split face CMU which is not a Class I material.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this project should result in an increase in assessed property value for the site and
should require no additional city service provision. The owner is anticipating spending
approximately $2.28 million on the development.
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://w .ci.oshkosh.wi.us
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of the General Development Plan and Specific
Implementation Plan with findings and conditions at its July 21, 2020 meeting. Please see the
attached staff report and meeting minutes for more information.
Respectfully Submitted,
//V��
Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
Approved:?
i�
Mark A. Rohloff
City Manager
City Hall, 215 Church Avenue P.O. Box 1130 Oshkosh, WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://w .ci.oshkosh.wi.us
ITEM: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
APPROVAL FOR A PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY FOR PROPERTIES (3
PARCELS) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF JACKSON
STREET AND W. FERNAU AVENUE
Plan Commission meeting of July 21, 2020.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicants: Jared Van Lanen
Property Owner: JJG Wisconsin LLC
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant requests approval of a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation
Plan (GDP/SIP) to allow for a personal storage facility for 3 parcels (Parcel IDs 91519601801,
91519601802 and 91519601803) located at the northeast corner of Jackson Street and W. Fernau
Avenue.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Type:
The subject area consists of 3 parcels of 28,000 sq. ft., 49,500 sq. ft. and 102,300 sq. ft. (0.64 acres,
1.14 acres and 2.35 acres, respectively) that were previously used for residential purposes. The
parcels are located along the Jackson Street corridor on the northeast corner of Jackson Street
and W. Fernau Avenue. One of the parcels has a deteriorating single family home according to
the applicant. The applicant's plans include demolition of this home. The surrounding area
consists of mixed residential, commercial and industrial uses. The subject parcels are zoned
Business Park with a Planned Development Overlay (BP -PD) and the 2040 Comprehensive
Land Use Plan recommends Industrial land use for the subject property and surrounding
properties to the north and east and Mixed Use to the west and south.
The applicant came before the Plan Commission at workshops that were held at the December
3rd, 2019 and January 21st, 2020 Plan Commission meetings. At the workshops, the applicant
explained his overall plans for the subject parcels. Staff had further discussions with the
applicant and explained that a zone change for the subject parcels was the first step in the
redevelopment process. The Plan Commission and Common Council approved a zone change
to allow a Planned Development overlay for the three subject parcels at the May 19th, 2020 and
June 9th, 2020 meeting respectively. The applicant has since filed for a General Development
Plan and Specific Implementation Plan (GDP/SIP) to allow a personal storage facility on the
three subject parcels.
Subject Site (3 Parcels)
Existing Land Use
Zoning
Vacant
BP -PD
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Existing Uses Zoning
Single family Residential (Town of Oshkosh,
North Institutional (Nova Counseling Services)
......... ......... ................. .
SouthSingle family Residential, Elks 292, Accu -Tech
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
EastLakeside Packaging Plus Inc.
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
West Residential (Town of Oshkosh)
County Zoning R -I (residential
properties), SMU (Nova
BP, HI, HI
.....................................................
HI
B-2, B-3
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use '
2040 Land Use Recommendation Industrial
AATAT VQ -TQ
Lwet bk]r
rio 151
175
The subject site consists of 3 contiguous parcels on the northeast corner of Jackson Street and W.
Fernau Avenue. The corner parcel has frontage along Jackson Street and W. Fernau Avenue, while
the parcel immediately east has frontage along W. Fernau Avenue. The parcel to the north has
frontage along Jackson Street. All 3 parcels are currently zoned BP -PD after a recent zone change.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 2
Now that the zone change has occurred, the applicant plans to combine the three parcels into a
single parcel and redevelop the site as a personal storage facility. The applicant requests Plan
Commission and Common Council review and approve of a General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan.
Use
The applicant is proposing five new buildings on the subject site. The two-story westernmost
building is planned for the corner of Jackson Street and W. Fernau Avenue and would have a
footprint of approximately 24,000 sq. ft. This building would include offices, a call center,
climate controlled storage units, a restroom, an elevator, heating and cooling. This building
would have frontage on Jackson Street and W. Fernau Avenue and be the most prominent of
the five buildings. The four buildings to the east are single story personal storage facilities.
Three of these are approximately 9,120 sq. ft. and the easternmost building is 8,800 sq. ft. in
area.
The subject parcels are zoned BP -PD and the personal storage facility land use is not a
permitted land use on a BP -zoned parcel, a Base Standard Modification (BSM) is required to
allow the proposed use.
Site Design/Access
Above is the site plan proposed by the petitioner. The plan shows the five building proposed for the site.
Building A is proposed for the west side of the site.
The proposed development would have a single access drive from W. Fernau Avenue on the
south edge of the site. Due to the proposed site layout, the lateral clearance as proposed (30 feet
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 3
rather than the 75 feet required by code) requires an access control variance if the development
proposal is approved.
The parking lot provided on the site plan provides for 12 parking spaces just east of Building A
and these spaces would accommodate the four staff members that would work on-site. These
spaces would also serve customers visiting Building A. Access drives would serve the four
personal storage buildings and run between all four buildings.
The applicant believes that the single access drive and 12 parking spaces will serve the needs of
the development. The 12 parking spaces significantly exceed the 4 spaces required based on the
largest employee shift on-site. However, in situations where less than 25 parking spaces are
required, the parking maximums and Conditional Use Permit requirement do not apply.
Therefore, the 12 proposed parking spaces would be permitted in this case.
The total proposed impervious surface area for the site is 67.53% of the lot area. The BP district
allows a maximum impervious coverage of 70% of the lot area. The plan as proposed appears
to meet the impervious surface maximum allowed under BP zoning.
Required
Provided
Front Setback (west)
Minimum: 1 for each
30 ft. (Jackson Street)
Street Side Setback (south)
employee on largest
30 ft. (drive aisle along Fernau)
Side Setback (north)
shift (4 total for 4
10 ft. (drive aisle)
Parking Spaces
employees)
12 Spaces
Impervious Surface
Maximum 70% of lot
67.53% of lot
Building Height
Maximum: 45 ft.
32 ft.
The parking lot provided on the site plan provides for 12 parking spaces just east of Building A
and these spaces would accommodate the four staff members that would work on-site. These
spaces would also serve customers visiting Building A. Access drives would serve the four
personal storage buildings and run between all four buildings.
The applicant believes that the single access drive and 12 parking spaces will serve the needs of
the development. The 12 parking spaces significantly exceed the 4 spaces required based on the
largest employee shift on-site. However, in situations where less than 25 parking spaces are
required, the parking maximums and Conditional Use Permit requirement do not apply.
Therefore, the 12 proposed parking spaces would be permitted in this case.
The total proposed impervious surface area for the site is 67.53% of the lot area. The BP district
allows a maximum impervious coverage of 70% of the lot area. The plan as proposed appears
to meet the impervious surface maximum allowed under BP zoning.
The proposed site plan meets setback requirements for the BP District for both the building and
paved area locations.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
Storm water management plans have been provided and are being reviewed by the Department
of Public Works. The applicant has been in discussion with the Department of Public Works
regarding storm water management for the area. The Department of Public Works will require
finalized storm water management plans for submission and approval as part of the Site Plan
Review processes.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 4
Minimum
Provided
Front Setback (west)
30 ft.
30 ft. (Jackson Street)
Street Side Setback (south)
30 ft.
30 ft. (drive aisle along Fernau)
Side Setback (north)
10 ft.
10 ft. (drive aisle)
Rear Setback (east)
25 ft.
41 ft. (rear of Building D)
The proposed site plan meets setback requirements for the BP District for both the building and
paved area locations.
Storm Water Management/Utilities
Storm water management plans have been provided and are being reviewed by the Department
of Public Works. The applicant has been in discussion with the Department of Public Works
regarding storm water management for the area. The Department of Public Works will require
finalized storm water management plans for submission and approval as part of the Site Plan
Review processes.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 4
Landscaping
Jackson/W. Fernau Landscaping
Points Required
Points Proposed
2,536 linear feet of foundation
/ 100 x 40 = 40 points per 100
linear feet - 1,015 total points
(507.5 on side of main
1,027 (274 on side of main
entrance, 253.75 on street
entrance, 618.3 on street facing
Building Foundation
facing sides)
sides)
342 (97.5 points tall trees,
342 (210 points tall trees, 132
Paved Area
129.6 points shrubs)
points shrubs)
Street Frontage (Jackson Street)
288 (144 points medium trees)
300 (300 points tall/medium trees)
Street Frontage (W. Fernau Avenue
620 (310 points medium trees)
650 (650 points tall/medium trees)
Total Street Frontage
908 (454 points medium trees)
950 (950 points tall/medium trees)
1,480.2 (1,380.2 leftover points
from arborvitae buffering the
60,161 sq. ft. of building
single-family property, 100 from
Yards
/1,000 x 20 - 1,204 points
the bioswale)
137.8 points along single family
0.4 opacity - BP/Single Family
property (53 points per 100 linear
requirement (53 points per
feet) 46 arborvitae and 18'
100 linear feet, 10' bufferyard
bufferyard width, 6' tall slatted
width, and 6' tall solid fence),
chain link fence and 10' bufferyard
Bufferyards
0.1 - BP/SMU requirement
width along SMU property
Total Points
3,606.8 Points
3,937 Points
0
.._
,�... _-.I—._. C_�
__j
_ Q n Bml,mg B Bmldmg G B zT, D
A' Fernau Ain.
B.o Fdter
C—T
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 5
Building Foundation
The landscape plan meets the total point requirement for the building foundation. The
landscaping ordinance also specifies that 25% of the required must be on the side facing the
public street and 50% of the required points must be located along the main entrance side of the
building or in this case the south facade of Building A. Of the building foundation landscaping,
618.3 points are proposed for street facing facades. The landscaping therefore exceeds the
ordinance requirement for street facing facades. For the main entrance side, 274 points are
provided. This is short of the 507.5 points required for the side with the main entrance. The
proposal is for a personal storage facility with multiple buildings and hence a large amount of
building foundation footage. The access doors for the personal storage buildings preclude the
installation of building foundation landscaping along a significant portion of the lengths of
these buildings. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant could attain the required landscaping
points along the south side of Building A (near the main entrance) by choosing different plant
species that yield higher point totals and by widening the planting beds to accommodate them.
For example, the applicant could include arborvitae along the south facade of Building A to
meet the requirement. Staff would not support a BSM for a deficiency in points along the main
entrance side.
Paved Area
The proposal meets the paved area requirement of 50 landscaping points per 10 parking stalls
or 10,000 sq. ft. of paved area. The code states that 30% of required points shall be devoted to
tall trees and 40% to shrubs. The proposal meets both of these requirements.
Landscape planter islands are required at the ends of all parking rows, driveway entrances and
intermediate locations such that there is a maximum of 180 feet (20 parking stalls) between
islands and each island shall include a tall deciduous/shade tree. The landscape plan shows a
distance in excess of 180 feet along the east facade of Building A where pavement exists without
planter islands. Staff would not support a BSM to permit this as it appears that the applicant
has room to accommodate a planter island which would meet the code requirement.
Street Frontage
Code requires 100 landscape points per 100 feet of street frontage. The landscaping ordinance
also specifies that 50% of the required points must be devoted to medium trees. The street
frontage landscaping proposed consists entirely of trees and the point totals meet the point
requirements.
Yards
Code requires 20 landscaping points per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area proposed for the site.
The applicant provides 1,480.2 yard landscaping points which would exceed this requirement.
Many of the yard landscaping points are derived from the arborvitae proposed for the
bufferyard area along the single family property to the north. The points proposed greatly
exceed the bufferyard requirement, so staff counted a number of them along with the proposed
bioswale on the east side of the site towards the yard landscaping requirement.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage
Bufferyard
The subject site is adjacent to a single-family property to the north that runs approximately 260
feet along the north property line. The remaining 360 feet of property line is shared with a
Suburban Mixed -Used (SMU) zoned institutional property. Ordinance requires a 0.4 opacity
level for the bufferyard along the single family property. The applicant proposes a row of 46
arborvitae along the length of the single family property and meets the code required 53 points
per 100 linear feet for a 10 foot wide bufferyard. The width of the proposed bufferyard on the
north property line is 18 feet. However, ordinance requires a 6' tall solid fence for 0.4 opacity
bufferyards less than 20 feet wide. The applicant would have to install the fencing or request a
BSM to allow the landscaping and current bufferyard width of 18 feet without the 6' fencing.
Staff would recommend requiring that the applicant install a 6' solid fence between Building A
and the proposed arborvitae landscaping. For the SMU-zoned property abutting the remaining
360 linear feet along the north property line, a 0.1 opacity level is required. The applicant
proposes a 10' green area and 6' tall slatted chain link fence along the SMU-zoned property.
The 10' green area and 6' solid fence would meet a 0.2 opacity requirement and exceeds the 0.1
standard prescribed by code.
The above photograph shows what the applicant is proposing for the bufferyard fencing.
Signage
The applicant initially submitted a sign package including a freestanding monument sign and
on -building wall signage for Building A on the Jackson Street facade. The applicant later
proposed wall signage for the south elevation of Building A also. Staff verified that the on -
building wall signage on the west and south facades meets code based on the facades' linear
footages. The applicant initially proposed a monument sign along Jackson Street but has
removed the sign in his conversations with staff. Staff does not have concerns with the
proposed signage.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage
Note the signage proposed for the West (Jackson Street) and South (W. Fernau Avenue) elevations. The
signage on the west and south elevations would meet code.
Site Lighting
281.16 R
0.03 2.17 0.06 0.46 1.39 7.03 3.82 1.03 1.94 7.28 3.31 4.62 6.02 2.24 6.24 4.25 0.00 0.00
005 021 009 081 3.39 11 474 0.81 000 1.63 000 0.10 1 56 0.00 1 52 163 000 000
005 0.08 0.10 079 6.90 5.10 2.00 0.56 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.04 0.45 0.00 0.46 038 0.00 0.00
0040400.10068 1.43 260 082 0.29 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.02 017 0.00 0.19 016 0.00 0.00
002 003 010 077 4.55 237 049 018 000 0.10 0.00 0.01 008 0.00 014 010 0.00 000
002 003 VO 074 2M 216 0.38 0.12 0.00 0.10 000 0.01 0070.00 019 0 17 000 000
001 0030.09073 1 .46 205 033 0,08 000 016 000 0.02 015 000 044 040 0.000.00
0.01 0.02 0.08 0.62 5.32 2.04 0.27 0.05 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.03 037 0.00 1.43 1.52 0.00 0.00
001 001 005 035 0.76 1 36 021 004 000 1.45 000 0.03 1 16 0.00 541 439 000 000
001 nM 003 010 016 046 091 nm ono 6s4 non nog 4 A 0nn 7 R r,64 0A2 014
000 001 002 003 0.05 014 0 15 043 2.41 10 390 608 875 201 263 212 051 010
0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.30 1.47 3.19 2.33 3.01 3.58 1.05 0.28 014 0.12 0.03
000
0.00 664 69 tt
The applicant proposes a mixture of on -building wall packs and freestanding light fixtures for
the site. The applicant's lighting consultant provided a photometric plan. The provided plan
does not include enough information to serve as a useful means of verifying code compliance.
Staff has repeatedly informed the consultant that the plan must include the photometric
information superimposed on the site plan. The provided plan does not include all lighting
values along what appears to be the north property line and no buildings, parking areas or
access drives are displayed. Staff has informed the consultant that the plan will have to show
lighting levels in relation to buildings, parking areas and access drives. If the GDP/SIP are
approved, staff will require a code compliant photometric plan showing all lighting values as
part of the Site Plan Review process. Based on the incomplete plan provided, light levels not far
from the north property line appear to greatly exceed the 0.5 footcandle maximum light
trespass permitted along the property line. Staff would not support a BSM for increased light
trespass along the north property line as there is a single family residence along that lot line and
the increased levels of light trespass could have a detrimental impact on that single family
property. The 24 foot mounting height of the proposed freestanding light fixtures meets the
code maximum of 25 feet for a BP -zoned parcel. The locations of the freestanding fixtures meet
the required setbacks based on the applicant's latest submission. Staff would require a code -
compliant photometric plan as part of the Site Plan Review process.
ITEM- GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 8
Building Facades
Commercial building design standards require facades to consist of at least 50% Class I
materials. The standards prohibit the use of Class IV materials on commercial facades. Staff
has discussed the proposed elevations with the applicant and explained that in exchange for
permitting the land use (a personal storage facility on a BP -zoned parcel), the commercial
design standards would apply for Building A. The applicant has requested a BSM to permit the
use of Class IV materials (ribbed steel paneling) on the east elevation.
The specific elevations breakdown is as follows:
Jackson /W. Fernau Elevations
Required Class
Provided Class I
Class IV (Prohibited)
North
50%
50.1%
0.0%
South
50%
55.4%
0.0%
East
50%
0%
100%
West
50%
56.8%
0.0%
NORTH ELEVATION U
EAST ELEVATION
The elevations for Building Aare shown above. The applicant requests a BSM to allow Class IV
materials for the east elevation.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage
Staff is not supportive of the requested BSM to permit the use of Class IV materials unless the
applicant greatly enhances the building foundation landscaping along the east facade of
Building A. The personal storage facility is not a permitted land use on a BP -zoned parcel and
the property is located along Jackson Street on a prominent corridor leading into the city. The
requirement that the project meet the commercial design standards is a means to justify the
BSM required for the land use. Currently, the east elevation does not meet code and the
applicant does not provide enough landscaping points to justify the requested BSM. Staff
discussed with the applicant the possibility of widening the planting areas adjacent to Building
A to accommodate more robust landscaping and additional point totals. The applicant stated
that this would interfere with the turning radii for some of the semi -truck traffic he anticipates
on-site.
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 10
�IIIII�'lllllh
NORTH ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST
WEST ELEVATION
The elevations for the four mini -warehousing buildings are shown above.
The mini -warehousing buildings located to the east of Building A would include steel paneling
and staff would support allowing these buildings to meet the Industrial Design Standards since
these buildings are located on the east side of the site and off of the main corridor. The
buildings have to include at least 15% Class I materials on their street facing facades. Currently
the buildings employ split face CMU which is not a Class I material.
Overall Site
The applicant is requesting the following BSMs.
• To permit the land use - a personal storage facility on a BP -zoned parcel
• To allow the use of Class W materials on the east facade of Building A
Staff is of the opinion that the applicant must significantly increase the building foundation
landscaping beyond ordinance requirements along the south and east facades of Building A in
order to support granting a BSM to allow the proposed use and use of Class IV materials for the
east facade of Building A. If the applicant is willing to make the required modifications to the
proposal, staff does not have major concerns with the proposal. If the applicant is unwilling to
install the landscaping along the south and east facades of Building A, staff would recommend
denial of the GDP/SIP.
FINDING S/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned
Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings
based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6):
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 11
(a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose
and intent of this Chapter.
(b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to
determine such consistency.)
(c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired
relationships between land uses, land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts
in the environs of the subject site.
(d) Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of
uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to
public sewer and water and public roads.
(e) The proposed Planned Development project will incorporate appropriate and
adequate buffers and transitions between areas of different land uses and development
densities/intensities.
(g) The proposed architecture and character of the proposed Planned Development
project is compatible with adjacent/nearby development.
(h) The proposed Planned Development project will positively contribute to and not
detract from the physical appearance and functional arrangement of development in the
area.
Staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan
with the findings listed above and the following conditions:
1.) BSM to allow the use: personal storage facility on a BP -PD -zoned parcel.
2.) BSM to allow Class IV materials on only the east facade of Building A.
3.) Class IV cladding materials shall not be permitted on the west, south and north
facades of Building A.
4.) Applicant shall install at least 300 landscaping points of year-round landscaping
along the east facade of Building A.
5.) Applicant shall install at a minimum one (1) planter island meeting code
requirements in the parking area east of Building A so that no more than 180 linear
feet are between landscaping areas.
6.) Applicant shall install a six (6) foot tall solid fence between the north facade of
Building A and the plantings in the bufferyard along the north edge of the site.
7.) For Buildings B, C, D and E, at least 15% of the facade area for each street facing
facade shall consist of brick matching the brick used on Building A.
8.) Lot combination shall occur prior to permit issuance.
9.) Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan for Department of Community
Development review and approval.
10.)Applicant shall submit a revised code -compliant photometric plan for Department of
Community Development review approval.
11.)All on -building and freestanding signage shall meet ordinance standards.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 12
The Plan Commission approved of the General Development Plan and Specific Implementation
Plan with findings and conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on
this item.
Site Inspections Report: Mr. Groth and Mr. Hinz reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
The applicant requests approval of a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation
Plan (GDP/SIP) to allow for a personal storage facility for 3 parcels (Parcel IDs 91519601801,
91519601802 and 91519601803) located at the northeast corner of Jackson Street and W. Fernau
Avenue.
Mr. Wiley presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is proposing five new buildings on the
subject site. The two-story westernmost building is planned for the corner of Jackson Street and
W. Fernau Avenue and would have a footprint of approximately 24,000 sq. ft. This building
would include offices, a call center, climate controlled storage units, a restroom, an elevator,
heating and cooling. The four buildings to the east are single story personal storage facilities.
Three of these are approximately 9,120 sq. ft. and the other building is 8,800 sq. ft. in area.
Personal storage facility is not permitted in BP -PD zoning, a Base Standard Modification (BSM)
is required to allow the proposed use. The proposed development would have a single access
drive from W. Fernau Avenue. The Department of Public Works will require finalized storm
water management plans as part of the Site Plan Review process. The applicant shall submit a
revised landscaping plan and a revised code -compliant photometric plan for Department of
Community Development review approval. All on -building and freestanding signage shall
meet ordinance standards. Commercial building design standards require facades to consist of
at least 50% Class I materials. The standards prohibit the use of Class IV materials on
commercial facades. The applicant has requested a BSM to permit the use of Class IV materials
on the east elevation. Staff is not supportive of the requested BSM to permit the use of Class IV
materials unless the applicant greatly enhances the building foundation landscaping along the
east facade of Building A. The mini -warehousing buildings located to the east of Building A
would include Class IV materials and staff would support allowing these buildings to meet the
Industrial Design Standards since these buildings are located on the east side of the site and off
of the main corridor. The buildings meet code for using at least 15% Class I materials on their
street facing facades. He said staff recommends approval of the General Development Plan and
Specific Implementation Plan with the findings and conditions listed in the staff report.
Ms. Propp opened technical questions to staff.
Mr. Perry asked where the snow would be stored.
Mr. Wiley said it does show the location on the site plan in a few locations.
Mr. Lyons pointed out on the site plan the snow storage areas.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 13
Mr. Perry said the areas on the east and south are a concern for him since Plan Commission has
been notified about the moisture issues on the neighboring lot. He said he would hope that
they could find a way to not increase the issue but maybe even find a way to decrease the issue
with this development.
Mr. Lyons explained the applicant has not provided final storm water management plans but
will need to submit it prior to any construction on the project. He said the applicant has shown
conceptual plans of where the drainage swale may take place but will need more specifics for
the final storm water management plans.
Mr. Wiley added he was just notified by Mr. Gohde from the Department of the Public Works
that there are issues with the placement of the drainage swale by the bio retention area which is
not acceptable and will have to be revised. He noted that the property owner from Lakeside
Packaging Plus to the east of the property sent an e-mail about his concerns in regard to the
snow storage areas/snow melt. He said the owner has had issues with flooding from the
property on the corner due to the way it drains.
Mr. Lyons commented that all Plan Commission members should have received a copy of that
e-mail.
Mr. Mitchell inquired about the sidewalks.
Mr. Gohde explained in reading through staff comments it looks as if the right-of-way was
being required to be graded to accommodate sidewalk in the future not that it would be
installed just for this single lot at this time because it would not connect to anything. He said
the site needed to be set up to accommodate with minimal changes.
Mr. Lyons commented this is very common for similar sites like this.
Mr. Mitchell said he didn't want the owner to put trees in to have to relocate them later.
Mr. Lyons commended Mr. Mitchell for making a great point. He said as staff gets into the final
plan set, they will ensure the trees are spaced out so they will be outside of where the
established sidewalk grade needs to be.
Mr. Mitchell inquired about the Bio Filter.
Mr. Gohde explained what a Bio Filter was, how the system works and that it would look very
similar to a rain garden from the surface. He said the City has some Bio Filters outside of the
Field Operations facility on Witzel Avenue if anyone wanted to see any example. He explained
they are typically a water quality element and not a water quantity element.
Mr. Mitchell inquired about the plantings and about the type of species.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 14
Mr. Lyons explained the final design and planting have to be approved by the Department of
Public Works along with an O&M (Operations and Maintenance) agreement which outlines a
lot of those details.
Mr. Gohde added O&M agreements are relatively new and explained their history.
Ms. Propp commented she could not recall if there were three or four storage units during the
workshop.
Mr. Wiley explained there was originally three then it was increased to four.
Ms. Propp said it looks crowded and that there may be an issue with snow storage/runoff. She
said it is a concern and hopes the applicant can speak to it.
Ms. Davey commented that had occurred to her as well. She said she is surprised with that
much hard space, about 67%, that there wasn't something else because the Bio Filter is not that
wide. She asked Mr. Gohde if the Bio Filter is the same thing that is located outside of the
Coughlin Center.
Mr. Gohde replied it is very similar to the ones outside of the Coughlin Center but the ones at
the Coughlin Center had a few features that made it slightly different.
Mr. Lyons said it has not been engineered yet but the applicant is present and should be able to
explain the civil plans and if the Bio Filter is that size or if it needs to grow.
Ms. Davey questioned if there could be something that could be done elevation wise that would
prevent moisture going to the property on the east.
Mr. Lyons stated the City's storm water management requirement require that they have to
maintain their water on site and it cannot flow onto the neighbor's property.
Mr. Gohde explained more in depth about the requirements.
Ms. Propp asked if there were any public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make
any statements.
Jared Van Lanen (applicant), N1213 Mayflower Drive of Greenville, said he is with Fox Valley
Storage. He thanked everyone for having him there and commended Mr. Wiley for helping
him through this process. He said their vision is to establish a footprint in the City of Oshkosh.
He said their facilities range from Appleton to Fond du Lac and they are growing to the point
where they need an office facility to house staff. He said they would like to have a central
location and have that be in Oshkosh. He explained why the location of the site and the
location of Oshkosh is ideal to them. He said building A is going to be the most prominent
building with temperature control. He gave a brief overview of building B, C, D and E and
stated that their properties are very well maintained. He said the civil engineer is present and
can answer any questions related to storm water management. He said they have not gone
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 15
through the entire process for the storm water management because they are waiting on
approval from the Plan Commission.
Ms. Propp inquired about the amount of buildings on the property and questioned if one would
have to be removed or revised if the storm water management cannot be accommodated.
Mr. Van Lanen agreed with Ms. Propp that it is a derivative of what the site can handle. He
said with them being under the maximum impervious surface, he believes the civil engineer
will be able to accommodate the storm water requirements. He noted the building furthest to
the east is only a westerly entry building and there is not any pavement along the backside of it.
Ms. Davey asked if it was only one side facing if it was going to be twice as deep or if the site
plan was not to scale.
Mr. Van Lanen replied it is less depth and explained the sizes of each building. He also
explained what types of items could be stored in each building depending on the size of the
buildings.
Ben Hamblin, 1445 McMahon Drive in Neenah, stated he is a civil engineer with McMahon
Associates. He said he has been working on this site with Mr. Van Lanen. He reiterated there
were staff comments but they held off on addressing them until they receive approval from
Plan Commission. He said snow storage should not be an issue because there is room on the
perimeter. He said they will remove the snow storage areas from the Bio Filter and detention
areas. He explained more about the Bio Filter and how it works. He said the storm water
device extends from the southeast to the northeast corner of the site and the site primarily
drains from west to east. He said all the water from the site that used to drain to the east will
not happen anymore because it will all be intercepted and routed through the storm sewer to
W. Fernau Avenue. He said there shouldn't be any moisture issues with the property to the
north.
Mr. Mitchell asked for more information about the storm water being routed through the storm
sewer on W. Fernau Avenue.
Mr. Hamblin explained in the southeast corner in the right-of-way there is an existing yard
drain which drains into the storm sewer within W. Fernau Avenue. He said they plan to
remove the yard drain and directly connect to the outlet structure for the Bio Filter.
There were no other public comments on this item.
Ms. Propp closed public comments and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
Mr. Van Lanen reviewed the conditions. He said he does not have objections to conditions 1, 2,
3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 but would like to discuss conditions 4, 5 and 6. He asked for an explanation
of condition #4.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 16
Mr. Lyons explained more about Planned Developments and how they typically work. He said
the applicant is requesting a Base Standard Modification, therefore, staff is requesting increased
landscaping to offset the request.
Mr. Van Lanen asked how he was deficient on the south side.
Mr. Lyons replied it is the east side that is deficient and it is only the foundation landscaping
points.
Mr. Van Lanen inquired about the types of species.
Mr. Lyons said staff can work with him on that.
Mr. Mitchell asked about the island.
Mr. Lyons said that is in condition #5.
Mr. Van Lanen discussed condition #5 and said he wanted to share the semi tracking plan detail
that shows how a semi would come in, back up and move in between building A and building
B. He said it is imperative that they will be able to receive tractor/trailer type traffic. He said
any island between building A and building B will not work for any flow of traffic. He shared
the plan with Plan Commission and staff.
Mr. Mitchell said he is surprised the island wouldn't be able to fit anywhere. He asked if there
was already an island on the south side by the three parking stalls.
Mr. Lyons replied there is not an island. He explained the code requirement for the island. He
said the plan is deficient in that area and would need a Base Standard Modification granted for
being deficient.
Mr. Van Lanen explained his interpretation of an island.
Mr. Lyons explained to Mr. Van Lanen what an island was and where it could be placed.
Mr. Van Lanen said he understands now and does not have any objections. He inquired about
condition #6 and for an explanation of the code.
Mr. Lyons explained the code and the requirement for bufferyards and how they work. He said
based on the calculations, a fence would be required and would have to be located on the
interior side of the landscaping.
Mr. Van Lanen asked if he could eliminate the need for a fence if he moved building A to the
south 2 feet to create a 20 foot setback.
Mr. Mitchell asked if the island could be similar to the islands behind Main Street where it is a
depressed elevation and could potentially help with storm water.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 17
Mr. Lyons said there is a minimal planting requirement that is required within it which could
also be used for rain gardens, bio swales and so on. Mr. Lyons reviewed the code requirements
and explained the options available for Mr. Van Lanen.
Mr. Wiley explained how staff calculated the landscaping.
Mr. Lyons explained more about the alternative options.
Motion by Hinz to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Conditions:
1. BSM to allow the use: personal storage facility on a BP -PD -zoned parcel.
2. BSM to allow Class IV materials on only the east fagade of Building A.
3. Class IV cladding materials shall not be permitted on the west, south and north facades of
Building A.
4. Applicant shall install at least 300 landscaping points of year-round landscaping along
the east fagade of Building A.
5. Applicant shall install at a minimum one (1) planter island meeting code requirements in
the parking area east of Building A so that no more than 180 linear feet are between
landscaping areas.
6. Applicant shall install a six (6) foot tall solid fence between the north fagade of Building
A and the plantings in the bufferyard along the north edge of the site.
7. For Buildings B, C, D and E, at least 15% of the facade area for each street facing fagade
shall consist of brick matching the brick used on Building A.
8. Lot combination shall occur prior to permit issuance.
9. Applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan for Department of Community
Development review and approval.
10. Applicant shall submit a revised code -compliant photometric plan for Department of
Community Development review approval.
11. All on -building and freestanding signage shall meet ordinance standards.
Seconded by Kiefer.
Ms. Propp asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Mr. Perry stated he still could not support this. He said this feels like a premature decision
because Plan Commission has not reviewed the Envision North Jackson Plan and the corner lot
is zoned Mixed Use with retail and neighborhood services. He said it does not seem to fit with
the Envision North Jackson Plan plus there are a lot of BSMs that are being questioned. He said
it also does not seem to fit with that particular area.
Mr. Mitchell inquired about the elevations and questioned how staff would ensure the building
materials that are proposed will be the ones used.
Mr. Lyons said the applicant could address the elevations.
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 18
Mr. Van Lanen said he was not sure what sample Mr. Mitchell was referencing. He explained
more about the materials that are going to be used.
Mr. Mitchell inquired about the south elevation on the four buildings.
Mr. Lyons explained condition #7 and said that condition addresses the south elevation.
Mr. Hinz commended Mr. Van Lanen for the progress he has made since the workshop. He
said Mr. Van Lanen has revised the plans drastically to satisfy Plan Commissions wants and
needs. He stated he will support this request.
Mr. Perry said he appreciates Mr. Hinz's comments but still feels as though the request does not
fit into the general area for what is planned or developed for this particular part of the city. He
appreciates the work Mr. Van Lanen has put into this and has nothing against the request but
feels Plan Commission should review the Envision North Jackson Plan prior to making a
decision on the request. He repeated that he currently cannot support this.
Ms. Propp said she agrees with Mr. Hinz. She mentioned the Envision North Jackson Plan
could take months to be approved. She said there has been issues along the way but Mr. Van
Lanen has come a long way. She wished the Envision North Jackson Plan was approved before
this request came to Plan Commission but it did not. She said she feels the development will
blend in with the area.
Mr. Kiefer commented it is a vast improvement over what is there now. He said this will fit into
the area well as other developments in the area come forward. He said Plan Commission
should move forward with this request and approve it.
Motion carried 8-1 (Nay: Perry).
ITEM— GDP/SIP Jackson and W. Fernau Personal Storage 19
SURMrTTO:
112 City of Oshkosh Dept. of Community Development
215 Church A�.,
Oshkosh Planned Development Application Oshkosh,M 5 901 0 Box 1130
For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plant9w123s-sosP
APPLICANT INFORMATION
"PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK'
/
Petitioner:- ^`r4G / '/ -
Date: /. /rte/7n
Petitioner's Address:tl/Zyi! �-r�e� � /� (_Jr/ —
q D� City: ` %�-- Siate:1e1611P: �'/L'
Telephone #: (/4%) 2 --ti-$-! Emaii: ��i7QY®
—�� G" Contact preference: ❑ Phone R Email
Status of Petitioner (Please Check): D Owner D Re (es '
tatie a�t ive ❑ D Prospective Buyer
Petitioner's Signature (required):
Mr6 Date:
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner(s): —7;9/ L_ / j
/ Date: _V
Owner(s) Address: / -r/;
. 3���
City: _State: ,zip:
Telephone #: (JyQ �Z� Emon: li D L i
9^'^°W&o refertence: QPhone ❑Emaif
Ownership Status (Please Check): D Individual D Trust D Partnership JJOCorporaffon
Property Owner Consent: (required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City Officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter
upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all
meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other
administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: i. r 1�.�i
4, Date:
TYPE OF REOUE57i �q .��/J'Zlfl GLC `��
D General Development Pian (GDP)
13General Development Plan (GDP) Amendmenr
Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) ❑ Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment
SITE INFORMATION
Address/Locatton of Proposed Project SIE ( :IQMM pQ -17AZA fa,
Proposed Project Type:
Current Use of Property:A
-Zoning:
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North:
South: -41"4445 I5:.2�5.. — ihl�l QJSJ�i
East:/ts Twa1uS»O/
West: iWWY 76 .4 i/ a/0.7...V9
➢ It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal.
D Application fees are due attime of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
D Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
For more information please visit the City's website of vwvw.cLoshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planninghtm
Sign— Stott Date Recd
June, 2020
Corner of Jackson and Fernau Narrative:
Jared VanLanen is presenting to the City of Oshkosh the redevelopment of the Northeast corner of
Jackson St. and Fernau Ave. The use of this site will be for a premium self- storage facility,
encompassing temperature controlled storage and personal storage.
Currently, 3 lots exist. One of the three lots consists of a degraded residential structure, an ugly
outbuilding, and improper drainage. Part of the redevelopment process will be to remediate the old
garage and home. The 3 lots will become combined into a single tax parcel. Through the site design
process, the drainage issues will become resolved.
The property is surrounded to the east and to the south by Heavy Industrial Zoning. To the west, is
Town of Oshkosh, to the North, is Town of Oshkosh, and to the Northeast, is SMU (Suburban Mixed
Use). Our proposal to put a premium self -storage facility at this location presents itself incredibly well as
a buffer between the Heavy Industrial Zoning and the future land uses to the west.
A Jackson St. driveway and two Fernau Ave. driveways currently exist. For the safety of all, the plan is to
eliminate the Jackson St. driveway and one of the Fernau Ave. driveways. The driveway closest to
Jackson Street will be moved further to the east to allow clear access and visibility.
Through many modifications and communication with staff, we believe the aesthetics of the buildings,
most notably Building "A", to be at the highest standards to the industry and among the highest
standards in the Jackson Street corridor.
The site will consist of 5 buildings in total. The elevations of all the buildings are included with this
submittal. Building A, the furthest to the West, will be Fox Valley Storage's flagship building. It will hold
our new call center, with 3 full time employees and 2 part time employees. This building will be a 2
story building served with an elevator, restroom, heating, and cooling. With the exception of the
eastern (internal to the site) facade, the building is nearly entirely brick, Split faced block, and glass. It
boasts an entry that is second to none. A Base Standard Modification may be needed for the East
(internal) side of this Building A.
Building B, C, D, and E will each serve the personal and business storage needs of the community. They
will conform to all Base Standards required of them along the Fernau Street frontage.
We are supplying ample parking. Chapter 30.81(C) requires that one space be provided for each
employee on the largest work shift. Given that our largest work shift would be 4 employees, the parking
as designed (12 hard spaces) is triple what code requires. This may help offset a Base Standard
Modification if needed.
The photometric plan which has been supplied is designed to meet code. We understand that a slightly
different version of the plan has been requested. We are attempting to get an accepted version of this
plan to staff yet this week. There are (7) 24' pole lights on the site which will provide site lighting for the
eastern portion of the site. Building A will have a combination of wall packs, wall wash, and sign lighting.
Landscaping is designed to meet the point total as defined in code. The northerly property line is
composed of multiple land use classifications (Township, residential and Suburban Mixed Use). We've
increased our plant total along the westerly portion (where the Township single family residence is) of
the site. We're proposing a full height arborvitae wall and have moved Building A further off the lot line
per staff's recommendation to offset the Base Standard Modification.
July 13, 2020
Addendum A
Corner of Jackson and Fernau Narrative Additional Items:
A BSM (Base Standard Modification) is being requested to allow a personal self storage facility on the
property currently zoned BP -PD (Business Park with a Planned Development Overlay). In May, we
proposed a zoning change to BP -PD to give staff the ability to allow this BSM for the use which we are
proposing. Through City Workshops and staff's review we believe we have a beautiful planset for which
the City of Oshkosh will be able to permit this use.
A BSM (Base Standard Modification) is being requested for the east sidewall of Building A. The materials
proposed to be used on this sidewall are Class IV materials. They are internal to the site and will be
covered up mostly by foundation landscaping. This sidewall will not be visible from Jackson Street. It is
important to us incorporate some of the same materials/colors across all the buildings on site to portray
a continuum of the facility (and not separate business entities). I would be agreeable to a condition that
no future free standing sign would be allowed on the Jackson Street frontage in return for allowing this
BSM.
An Access Control Variance is being requested. The 75' minimum which is required by code is requested
to be at 30' as proposed on our plans. The buildings, parking, and paved areas are set back far enough
off of Fernau Ave, that it will not impede traffic flow. It also will provide enough visual site path to
alleviate any safety concerns. The "throat" of the driveway will be set at the 30' length.
July 14, 2020
Addendum B
Corner of Jackson and Fernau Narrative Additional Item:
The BSM (Base Standard Modification) for Building A is being revised to the attention of the East
sidewall only. The remaining 3 facades are now within code compliance of the Class I material
requirements. In addition, the East sidewall is now being revised to include the use of 8% Glazing. In
addition, in helping to offset this BSM request, our Yard landscaping proposal is inclusive of 414 excess
points or 34% more than the 1,204 points required per code.
GDP/SIP B & P ORDER OF ELKS INC BRIAN R WELKE
NE CNR OF JACKSON ST & W FERNAU AVE 175 W FERNAU AVE 3185 JACKSON ST
PC: 07-21-20 OSHKOSH WI 54901 OSHKOSH WI 54901
CARRIE A NICHOLSON
3168 JACKSON ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901
LEE J KIENAST
2131 LIN WAY CT
OSHKOSH WI 54904
ROBERT T MARTIN
4579 COUNTY RD N
OSHKOSH WI 54904
JARED VAN LANEN
N1213 MAYFLOWER DR
GREENVILLE WI 54942
JERRY A DUGGAN
3141 JACKSON ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901
NOVA COUNSELING SERVICES INC
3240 JACKSON ST
OSHKOSH WI 54901
WALTER G ENGLER REV TRUST
6331 COUNTY ROAD M
WINNECONNE WI 54986
JJG WISCONSIN LLC
3305 FUJITA ST
TORRANCE CA 90505
LAKESIDE PACKAGING PLUS INC
1040 BREEZEWOOD IN
NEENAH WI 54956
PINE APARTMENTS IV LLC
3389 COUNTY ROAD A
OSHKOSH WI 54901
TOWN OF OSHKOSH
1076 COZY LN
OSHKOSH WI 54901
r�
J
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only. and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no iiablity for the accuracy of the informafion. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer cease go to
mm.c oshkosh.m.us.GISoisclainner
FRT
N
A 1in=0.03 mi
lin=150ft
Printing Date: 612312020
Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
aii.
Jr
Oshkosh