Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout22. 20-320 JUNE 23, 2020 JULY 14, 2020 20-291 20-320 ORDINANCE FIRST READING SECOND READING (CARRIED 7-0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN ) PURPOSE: APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (I) TO INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (I-PD) AT 221 N. SAWYER STREET INITIATED BY: OSHKOSH FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved A GENERAL ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH AMENDING SECTION 30-32 OF THE OSHKOSH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ZONING DISTRICTS. The Common Council of the City of Oshkosh do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That Section 30-32 of the Oshkosh Municipal Code pertaining to Zoning Districts and the map therein described is hereby amended by changing the district character of the described property at 221 N. Sawyer Street from Institutional District (I) to Institutional District with a Planned Development Overlay (I-PD). PARCEL NO. 0608750000 -221 N. SAWYER STREET THE SOUTH 285.56 FEET OF LOT 2 AND THE NORTH 187.90 FEET OF LOT 3 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH,RANGE 16 EAST,PLUS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO SAID LOT EXTENDING TO THE CENTERLINES OF N. SAWYER STREET AND NATIONAL AVENUE, ALL IN THE 6TH WARD, CITY OF OSHKOSH, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. JUNE 23, 2020 JULY 14, 2020 20-291 20-320 ORDINANCE FIRST READING SECOND READING CONT'D SECTION 3. Publication Notice. Please take notice that the City of Oshkosh enacted Ordinance #20-291 APPROVE ZONE CHANGE FROM INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (I) TO INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (I-PD) AT 221 N. SAWYER STREET on June 23, 2020. This ordinance changes the zoning at 221 N. Sawyer Street from Institutional District (I) to Institutional District with a Planned Development Overlay (I-PD). The full text of the Ordinance may be obtained at the Office of the City Clerk, 215 Church Ave. and on the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us. Clerk's phone: (920) 236-5011. ni` 6., Oshkosh TO• Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Mark Lyons Planning Services Manager DATE. June 18, 2020 RE. Approve Zone Change from Institutional District (I) to Institutional District with a Planned Development Overlay (I-PD) at 221 N. Sawyer Street (Plan Commission Recommends Approval) BACKGROUND The subject site consists of one 3.73 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of N Sawyer Street and National Avenue. The property is a former Army Reserve building and is now used as storage site for Oshkosh Fire Department and other City departments. The surrounding area consists primarily of commercial and residential uses as well as Lourdes Academy to the east. ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a Planned Development Overlay to the existing Institutional district (I) base zoning to allow for future site modifications including a training tower between the public right-of-way and principal building. The Fire Chief explained the property was identified as the preferred location for the Fire Department training center during the facility needs assessment. The Fire Chief further outlined some of the reasons for the site being the logical location, including its proximity and visibility to schools which can be used in recruiting and being centrally located to providing effective services and quicker response times. Staff is supportive of adding the Planned Development Overlay as it will allow flexibility of zoning ordinance standards for additions/improvements to the site. FISCAL IMPACT The zone change has no direct fiscal impact on the property Staff would note, the Plan Commission recommended adding a condition that the existing fencing along National Avenue be altered to create solid screening. This could be achieved by adding slatted or interwoven elements to the existing fence. The Plan Commission fencing improvements recommendation will have a direct fiscal impact on the project. Additional landscaping may also be added to the site which would also have a direct fiscal impact. Staff is currently reviewing these potential costs, as those costs were anticipated in the building renovation phase of the project that will not take place immediately City Hall,215 Church Avenue P.O.Box 1130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us RECOMMENDATION The Plan Commission recommended approval of the zone change as requested at its June 16, 2020 meeting. Please see the attached staff report and meeting minutes for more information. Respectfully Submitted, Approved: Mark Lyons ---------- Mark A. Rohloff Planning Services Manager City Manager City Hall,215 Church Avenue P.O.Box 1130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130 920.236.5000 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us ___C :iY 1 A1 Fr °° - - 0 fit„ice g R e . r .. x I t m a UP z SOUT JILAND-Av 1317 ,v �u.����y r ti3, itity t t ir c Ell ide CI AY-TON-CT9 41ir+♦.♦.•.•.♦.♦.♦ rj Ea ����.��� E o ..�.�........ SUBJECT NATIONAL-AV �.%a . SITE 1 I sL sr Ixs�R ; -4e d yr®e r ai®` x:®'' nv ^oa® mr rsez 8 c ®^ 8 3 '$ ^ fa 1304 1234 1222 1216 ` F-AUST-AV _ow y ,i:-. : . ' .' 0 12 t 1z0 darn i E5P I " rig . . . , , ._.t 3W ^ M' � a .fii.cx.. 'a>:'`e'rAr i" T x. s�^: tril +' 59i`�'f• a C A �I � ,sue 1 in=0.03 ml ..... a. -„,„,,rasrr3,,,,,, :„.,.? :;*tt v i'. _,' `1,„,,,,a„�_^-e,„..-v MF „, A 1 in= 150 ft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general dentfi a on purposes only,and Ci - the City of Oshkosh assumes no liablay for the accuracy of the information. Those using the Printing Date'6/8/2020 information are responsible for verfying accuracy. For MI disclaimer lease go to Oshkosh w.vwo.oshkoshwi.us:GISdiscaimer Prepared by City of Oshkosh.WI C`Lsers noel.Ces',top2i20 Pie,Csrnis_on S ie P ar Map Te:rplae m.d Jut mina, ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT (I) TO INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (I-PD) &APPROVAL OF A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A FIRE TRAINING FACILITY AT 221 N. SAWYER STREET Plan Commission meeting of June 16, 2020. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Oshkosh Fire Department Owner: City of Oshkosh Action(s) Requested: The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Institutional District(1) to Institutional District with a Planned Development Overlay(I-PD). The applicant also requests approval of a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for a fire training facility. Applicable Ordinance Provisions: The Zoning Ordinance does not establish criteria relative to appropriateness of changing zoning from one classification to another but relies on the Comprehensive Plan and good planning principles. Planned Development standards are found in Section 30-387 of the Zoning Ordinance. Property Location and Background Information: The subject site consists of one 3.73 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of N. Sawyer Street and National Avenue. The property is a former Army Reserve building and is now used as an Oshkosh Fire Department site. The surrounding area consists primarily of commercial and residential uses as well as Lourdes Academy to the east. Subject Site Existing Land Use Zoning Institutional I Adjacent Land Use and Zoning Existing Uses Zoning North Commercial UMU ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. South Commercial&Single Family Residential UMU&SR-5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. East Commercial&School UMU&I-PD West Single&Multi-family Residential SR-5 &MR-20 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Recommendation Land Use 2040 Land Use Recommendation Community Facility ANALYSIS Zone Change The applicant is requesting a zone change to add a Planned Development Overlay to the existing Institutional district(I)base zoning to allow for future site modifications including a training tower between the public right-of-way and principal building. Staff is supportive of adding the Planned Development Overlay as it will allow flexibility of zoning ordinance standards for additions/improvements to the site. Use/Site Design The applicant plans to redevelop the existing site into a fire department training facility and office space. Phase 1 of the plan is to erect a training tower in the existing south parking lot. The training tower will be 38' 4" tall and located between the principal structure and public right-of-way. Base Standard Modifications(BSMs) are required for both the proposed height and location of the structure. 14 7-1 y ELEVATION VIEW-1 Proposed location of training tower(left) and tower elevation (right). Staff is supportive of the BSM to allow the tower to exceed the maximum height for accessory structures(18 ft.) as the increased height is needed for fire training exercises. The applicant states that the proposed location within the south parking lot is advantageous because the existing unused parking lot would allow fire apparatus and firefighters to perform training without concerns of other vehicles driving though and creating potential hazards. They also note that the proposed location is desirable as it has proximal access to a fire hydrant and is secured with existing chain link fencing. Staff is supportive of a BSM to allow the tower in the proposed location as it will allow the Fire Department to effectively and safely conduct training. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 2 According to the applicant, the tower will not be suitable for live fire exercises and no burning will occur in the tower. Subsequent phases noted by the applicant include future redevelopment of the site within the existing footprint and include improvements to existing infrastructure, structures and grounds. Signage No new signage is being proposed. Landscaping A landscaping plan was not included with this request. As the site is not being developed beyond its existing footprint,no additional landscaping is required by code. There are several existing mature trees to the west of the parking lot that will serve to "break up' the view of the training tower from the neighboring residential uses to the west. Staff feels that the existing landscaping will sufficiently mitigate the visual impact of the tower from the neighboring properties. The height/size of the existing trees will better screen the tower than new evergreen plantings that would only be minimum 4' tall at the time of planting. R l View looking north along west property line Storm Water Management/Utilities Storm water management plans have not been submitted with this request. The Department of Public Works will review storm water management for the site as part of the Site Plan Review process. Site Lighting ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 3 No new lighting is being proposed at this time. Building Facades No change to the existing building facades is being proposed with this request. FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Planned Development district, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the criteria established by Chapter 30-387 (C)(6): (a) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the overall purpose and intent of this Chapter. (b) The proposed Planned Development project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and other area plans. (It is the responsibility of the City to determine such consistency.) (c) The proposed Planned Development project would maintain the desired relationships between land uses,land use densities and intensities, and land use impacts in the environs of the subject site. (d)Adequate public infrastructure is or will be available to accommodate the range of uses being proposed for the Planned Development project, including but not limited to public sewer and water and public roads. Staff recommends approval of the rezone, General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan with the findings listed above and the following conditions: 1. BSM to allow 38'4" tall accessory structure where code allows a maximum height of 18'. 2. BSM to allow accessory structure in front of the principal structure. The Plan Commission approved of the rezone, General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan with findings and conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commissions discussion on this item. Site Inspections Report: Ms. Propp reported visiting the site. Staff report accepted as part of the record. The applicant requests a zone change from the existing Institutional District(I) to Institutional District with a Planned Development Overlay(I-PD). The applicant also requests approval of a General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan for a fire training facility. Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land use and zoning classifications in this area. The applicant is requesting a zone change to allow for future site modifications. The applicant plans to redevelop the existing site into a fire department training facility and office space. Phase 1 of the plan is to erect a training tower in the existing south parking lot. The training tower will be 38' 4" tall and located between the ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 4 principal structure and public right-of-way. Base Standard Modifications (BSMs) are required for both the proposed height and location of the structure. The applicant states that the proposed location within the south parking lot is advantageous because the existing unused parking lot would allow fire apparatus and firefighters to perform training without concerns of other vehicles driving though and creating potential hazards. They also note that the proposed location is desirable as it has proximal access to a fire hydrant and is secured with existing chain link fencing. According to the applicant, the tower will not be suitable for live fire exercises and no burning will occur in the tower. Subsequent phases noted by the applicant include future redevelopment of the site within the existing footprint and include improvements to existing infrastructure, structures and grounds. There will be no changes to signage,landscaping, site lighting or building facades. Department of Public Works will review storm water management for the site as part of the Site Plan Review process. He said there could be a conditioned added for solid fencing if Plan Commission felt it was appropriate. There were also some questions that were sent to staff from neighbors with concerns. He said staff recommends approval of the rezone,General Development Plan and Specific Implementation Plan with the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Ms. Propp opened technical questions to staff. Mr.Hinz said the City is amendable to adding the slated fencing but asked if the Fire Department was amendable to it due to the intense heat that would be generated. Mr. Lyons said that is something that needs to be discussed with the applicant. He mentioned one of the property owners asked if the screening could be turned into more of a solid screening. Ms. Davey asked how high the security fence is. Mr. Lyons replied it is 6 feet in height with 3 feet of barbed wire on top. Mr. Slusarek clarified there will be no burning at the site so the heat would not be an issue. Mr.Mitchell stated he will not be voting on this item because he manages the property directly to the west of the site. He inquired about how the Fire Department acquired the building. He said it is a relatively quiet neighborhood that is in close proximity to a number of schools and parks. He said he is curious why it is not a residential area. Mr. Lyons said he would defer to the Fire Chief on how they came to acquire the property. Mr. Mitchell said to be clear, this wouldn't have been a decision outside of just the Fire Department and asked who was in charge of land use. Mr. Lyons said he was not sure when the city acquired the property but he could look it up. Mr.Mitchell asked where that decision lied. He asked who chose that the building would be used for the Fire Department. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 5 Mr. Lyons explained it is currently zoned as Institutional and was Institutionally zoned before the city acquired it. He reiterated he will let the Chief respond to how they became interested in the property. Mr.Mitchell questioned why Mr.Lyons was not aware about property that the city owns how it is used. Mr. Lyons said the site was vacant for a while but is not sure when the city took ownership of it but he could check the tax records. Ms. Propp commented the Fire Chief can answer these questions. Mr.Mitchell asked whose role it was to notify the Fire Department and let them know this property was available for use. Mr. Lyons reiterated the Fire Chief can explain how they became interested in the property. Mr.Mitchell asked for confirmation that Mr.Lyons did not know. Mr. Lyons confirmed he does not know when the city had interest in the property. Mr.Mitchell asked again how Mr. Lyons did not know how this happened. He said after the city acquires it they would at some point look at the different options for the use of the site. He demanded to know who makes the decision for what it is used for if it is not Mr. Lyons. He stated he is surprised it is not Mr. Lyons and questioned again who decides what to do with the city's vacant lands. Mr. Lyons said different departments within the city do occasionally acquire properties for different uses. He explained Plan Commission would not get involved until the site is getting redeveloped. Ms.Davey commented she did look up the information and it states that the city acquired the property in 2003 for$1. Mr. Ford asked for confirmation that this property was Institutionally zoned prior to the City acquiring it. Mr. Lyons confirmed it was. Mr. Ford asked if it was common practice that the city does not change the zoning once it acquires property. Mr. Lyons explained the zoning would only be changed once the use was changed. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 6 Ms. Propp opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any statements. Mike Stanley(applicant), 101 Court Street, stated he is the Fire Chief for the City of Oshkosh. He thanked Plan Commission for giving him the opportunity to speak to this item. He said to Mr. Mitchell's comment, the person that ultimately makes the decision is the City Manager. He said the City Manager decides how the city allocates property that the city owns. He explained the city acquired the property when it is abandoned by the federal government. He said it sat vacant for a while and since then it has been used as a multipurpose facility by multiple departments. He said the Common Council directed the City Manager and the Fire Department to do a comprehensive needs study for the Fire Department which was completed in 2019. He said one of the things that has been a burden to the Fire Department is the lack of a training facility. He said it is something they specifically asked the consultant to look into and identify some solutions. He explained the processes the consultant used to finish the needs assessment. He said the firm's recommendation was that a training facility should be located at the armory site for multiple reasons. He said it was already a training facility prior to being acquired by the city and it would make sense to repurpose a training facility for a training facility again. He said it is a benefit to be in close proximity to schools because it can be used as a recruiting tool. He said the central location of the facility is also a benefit because it helps provide effective service and a quicker response time. He said being near these amenities makes this location very desirable. He stated the tower is not a fire rated building and does not have the functionality to do live burns evolutions in it. He explained this is a phased approached to becoming a fully operational training center and they never envision burning of Class A combustible materials. He mentioned just moments before he came to the meeting,he received the final draft from the architectural firm they contracted with to develop the phases and the training center for the Fire Department. He said it is their intention to better screen the property by using slating for the fencing and addition landscaping. He said he has already addressed a number of concerns from the neighbors. He urged Plan Commission to move forward with this item because it has some long reaching implication and explained what some of those were. He said he is sensitive to the concerns by everyone involved but he is also sensitive to the 110 firefighters that he needs to make sure are trained to effectively and safely combat these emergencies. He explained that not having a training center in Oshkosh effects the service level they can provide, it increases the amount of overtime for the city and it decreases the Insurance Service Office (ISO)rating which impacts the insurance level for homeowners and business owners. He said it has many implications to the whole community. Mr. Ford asked if it currently being used as a training site because it was mentioned in the correspondence Plan Commission received. Chief Stanley replied they have historically used the parking lot for auto extrication training. He explained the process and said the training has been completed and the cars will be removed in the morning. Ms.Davey asked if there was training in the evenings. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 7 Chief Stanley explained ISO requires 8 hours of night-time training which is after business hours. He said the training would be wrapped up by 7 or 8 o'clock in the evening. He stated that would be the exception and not the rule. Mr.Hinz inquired about the maximum and average amount of people being trained on the site. Chief Stanley answered at the peak it would be a dozen or less and that would include instructional staff. He said most of the time it will be around eight with as little as three. Mr.Hinz inquired about the noise level. Chief Stanley said the noise level would be minimal such as power tools, chainsaws or other extrication tools. He said they will be very cognizant when using tools on the site. He said they will not be training with any loud explosives.He said they will also not be running the sirens or air horns during the training. Ms. Propp asked what the purpose of the tower was. Chief Stanley explained the ISO requirement and how the tower can be utilized for training. He said the tower meets virtually every training requirements that they need except for the ability to bum. Mr.Mitchell asked how many other sites in total were evaluated as part of the study. He asked if there was a cost benefit report and if there was,was reviewed by Planning or anyone responsible for land use. Chief Stanley said he cannot speak to that because the consultant worked directly with other staff. Mr. Lyons added the Council did weigh in on the facility study. Chief Stanley said that is correct. He said Council also weighed in on the purchase of the tower with the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). He said Council has seen the study and reports and is very aware of the project because it is in the CIP. Mr.Mitchell asked for clarification if it was only for the tower. Chief Stanley replied it is for the tower and utilizing the armory for a training center. Mr.Mitchell asked for confirmation that no one present knows of what sort of site assessment work has been done in terms of possible options within the community for a training facility like this besides this site. Mr. Lyons reiterated there was a comprehensive facilities study done that was taken to Council. He said this was part of that facilities study. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 8 Mr.Mitchell asked if it looked at other potential sites as well. Chief Stanley stated the consultants told him they reviewed the options and this was the best choice that they came up with. Mr.Mitchell stated the consultants made the recommendation for the site and asked Mr. Lyons if his department was consulted at all. Mr. Lyons replied this is why they are here today to decide if it is appropriate from a land use perspective. Mr.Mitchell said that is what Plan Commission is doing but questioned why Planning was not involved in the land use decision of this. Mr. Lyons explained the Planning Department is not involved in facilities study. Mr.Mitchell asked what about land use. Mr. Lyons explained that is what they are doing today. Mr.Mitchell asked if Mr. Lyons had seen this before today. Mr. Lyons explained it does not get to Plan Commission without being discussed with the Planning Department first to discuss the process. Mr.Mitchell questioned why Mr. Lyons' department did ask to look at other possible options in the community instead of just going with the recommendation presented. Mr. Lyons replied staff evaluated the request they received from the Fire Department and discussed the process with them as they would with anyone else who proposes a use to the city. Ms. Propp inquired about what the final site will look like. Chief Stanley said they would stay in the same footprint. He said they would renovate and repurpose the main armory building as well as the outbuilding to the north. He noted that this was a deteriorating structure and that site has not been maintained. He said if this isn't turned into a training center, it will most likely keep deteriorating. He said his intent is to make this a crown jewel for the city,make it something everyone will be proud of,raise the value of the property and so on. He said they want to beautify the greenspace, add a firefighter memorial and a nice sign. Ms. Propp asked if there would still be sufficient room in the parking lot for auto extrication training. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 9 Chief Stanley confirmed they would. He addressed the concern about off-street parking related to the fire apparatus/congestion and said this training center will give them enough room to move everything into the site. Ms. Davey said because this is so near to West High School, she asked if the property will be secure enough so that students cannot play on the tower. Chief Stanley replied it is gated and fenced. He pointed out it was a military building and has a 6-foot fence with razor wire on it. He said ultimately, they cannot keep the students out but it would be very difficult for them to get in. He mentioned there is lighting in the parking lot. Mr. Lyons showed the Google Street View of the parking lot. Mr.Marshall stated this is a great thing for the city to have and that everyone should be proud to have a training center. He said the question is how the vetting take place and if this is the right location for it. He asked where the access point would be for a firetruck to enter. He also asked if noise from the trucks, such as the air brakes, cause a disturbance to the neighborhood. Chief Stanley pointed out that there is a very large access gate on the National Avenue side. He said to access the parking lot, a vehicle would have to enter through that gate. He said he would consider the noise from the vehicles as routine traffic noise. Mr.Marshall said there are not many semis or big trucks that go down Sawyer Street. He said this is a quiet neighborhood and he doubts that there are a lot of air brakes that are going off in the area. He stated he is curious if the neighbors have been contacted and if they are kosher with this request. Chief Stanley stated this is the first time he has been through this process in the City of Oshkosh and is not familiar with planning and zoning. He asked Mr. Lyons if this item was noticed. Mr. Lyons replied it was noticed and the Fire Chief has had conversations with the neighbors. Chief Stanley said there are neighbors who are present who would like to give their input as well. Mr.Mitchell inquired about the fire hydrant on the western portion of the property because it was listed as being an asset. Chief Stanley explained it is in the phased-out development that they will create a hydrant loop inside of the parking lot. He said the fact that there is already a hydrant there they can loop into is an asset. He said in the short term, they can still connect to that hydrant by installing a small access gate near the hydrant until the work is done to bring the hydrant loop into the complex. He said according to the Department of Public Works, the hydrant is an asset because the city would not have to put in the infrastructure. He stated there are a lot of other existing assets to this site already. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 10 Mary D'Angelo, 1223 National Avenue, stated she is in full support of the training center. She said all her windows on the north side of her house are looking directly at the tower. She stated there is a big gap where there are no trees. She stated her concern is the notice she received pointed out the subject site on the north side of the building where there are no houses. She pointed out there is also a hydrant at the end of Clayton Court. She said there is another parking area to the north and does not understand why the tower cannot be located in that area. She said she is not as concerned with the noise as much as the location of the tower. David and Janet Zerbe, 1217 National Avenue, asked if staff could pull up the aerial view and stated they are directly across from the gate. Mr.Zerbe pointed out the trees and said they are about 25 feet tall and the tower is going to be 38 feet tall. He stated that he supports the Fire Department and understands what they want to do. He said they have lived there for 32 years and have never had an issue until last year with the junk cars in the lot. Ms. Zerbe said as of today, the cars will have been sitting there for two weeks. She understands that they will be removed and supports the training but does not want it in her front lawn. She said any residential property wouldn't allow chopped up cars in the front lawn. She said her other main concern is the firetrucks and ambulances that come for the training. She said last week she counted 12 people and stopped counting after that. She said her street is lined with vehicles and does not understand why they cannot park in the parking lot. She stated she cannot back out of her driveway when there are vehicles parked on both sides of the street. She stated this tower is a horrible idea. She said her street is quiet and only one block long. She stated in broad daylight, there is neighbor who has already climbed the fence. Mr.Zerbe said he has worked on that structure for seven years and is an electrician for the City of Oshkosh. He stated he is very upset because he knows what is being housed in the buildings and how it is currently functioning and said there is no reason why the tower cannot be located on the north side. Ms. Zerbe pointed out there is also a fire hydrant on the corner of Sawyer Street and National Avenue. She said it would give more room for parking and is would not disturb as many residents. Mr. Zerbe said they were also confused by the notice they received. He said because of the tower, they would have to sell their house and the value would decrease greatly. Ms. Zerbe stated her daughter is a realtor and she is very concerned with how they would sell their house due to the tower and the commotion. Mr.Zerbe said it would help if there were 35-foot trees lined up in front of the fence but there is not. He said there are a lot options for the location of the tower and suggested putting up the solid fencing before anything else. There were no other public comments on this item. Ms. Propp closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing statements. Chief Stanley asked staff to bring up the Google image. He said he was unsure about the map that was sent with the notice. Mr. Lyons explained it is the same map they do very every notice. He said the property is hatched and the arrow points to the property location not the location of the tower. He apologized because it was not intended to mislead the neighbors. He stated the arrow is strictly there to point to the property location. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 11 Chief Stanley pointed out on the Google map the parking lots and explained why the tower cannot be located on the north side. He said some of the reasoning is due to the layout of the parking lot and some of it is due to the proximity of certain rooms in the building. He said the building Mr. Zerbe is utilizing for work is housed in the building to the north and if the tower were located there,Mr. Zerbe would not be able to access that building. He said the geotechnical engineering survey also stated it should be located to the south. He said he fully understands the Zerbe's concerns. Motion by Ford to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report. Conditions: 1. BSM to allow 38'4"tall accessory structure where code allows a maximum height of 18'. 2. BSM to allow accessory structure in front of the principal structure. Seconded by Davey. Ms. Propp asked if there was any discussion on the motion. Mr.Perry stated there is an outdoor storage issue which has to be rectified. He asked what other uses would be allowed in the Institutional District if the city did not utilize the building. Ms. Propp left at 5:40 pm. Mr. Lyons listed some of the uses such as community living arrangements, daycares or churches. He also listed uses the conditional uses such as larger community living arrangements or institutional residential such as transitional housing. Mr.Perry asked if it could be a group home, a youth detention or something similar. Mr. Lyons replied those could potentially be an allowed use with a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Davey said she understands the concerns but also thinks this is a really good use of an existing structure. She said this is also a nice area for it because it will get recognition from the students. She said for the most part no matter where the tower is going to be located, there will always be someone living across the street. She stated Plan Commission should accept this request. Mr.Mitchell stated this process seems to be somewhat of a failure of municipal planning. He stated there was a decision made for the use of the building that did not involve the Planning Department, the Comprehensive Plan or any documents related to land use. He said none of that was consulted when the city considered what they should do with this 3.37 acre plot of land that is in walking distance from three schools or various parks. He stated Plan Commission should not have to say yes just because the Fire Department needs a training facility. He clarified that he fully supports their effort to get one. He stated the city is just going ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 12 to give the Fire Department this plot of land without any evaluation of what the best use would be for the plot of land. He said the area could be used to achieve some of the goals of the city such as adding more density. He stated that is not a discussion that seems to have taken place. He stated that fundamentally this is a vast failure on part of the city. He said he asked about other sites and strongly disagrees with the notion wherever the tower goes that someone will be opposed to it. He said this is going to be located in a residential area and he hasn't seen this building used for about 15 years. He named other sites in the city the training center could be located. He said all this information should have been presented to Plan Commission to be able to make an informed decision but it is not what has been presented to them today. He stated he does not think the Plan Commission should vote on the item. He said no one wants to live with a 38 foot tower next to them and it is a hard sell. He said he understands that it has to go somewhere but does not know if this is the best place for it. He said the trees have been mentioned and pointed out that some of them are junk maple trees. He asked if the city is going to replace them if they die. He said the tall trees are not blocking anything and better screening would be needed right away. He said he strongly encourages the Plan Commission to consider if they were living next door to think about what they would hope for in terms of some sort of privacy barrier. Ms. Propp arrived at 4:44 pm. Mr.Hinz reminded Plan Commission that their purview is to decide if the land use fits the Comprehensive Plan. He said this property is zoned Institutional and is an acceptable use in this area. He said it is not Plan Commission's job to review different sites and where properties should be located. He explained Plan Commission's job decide on the request that is brought to them to decide if it belongs there. He said the slated fencing should help screen the property. He said this will be used for training for only the Fire Department. He commented the Fire Department is trained in so many ways that most people don't even know such as earthquake response or helping other communities with emergencies. He understands the concerns but said this is not going to be something that use used 24/7 365 days a year. He said there are not enough firefighters to train and to have them on staff. He said there is not a lot of staff due to the budget of the city. He said it may be a nuisance from time to time just like it is during certain events in the city or living near a baseball park. He stated he will be supporting this because he thinks it is best for the community as a whole. Mr. Lyons reminded Plan Commission that they have the authority to add or remove conditions as they see fit. Mr. Ford noted the CIP did come before the Plan Commission on September 18,2019. He said Council had a workshop on October 28, 2019. He said Council then approved the CIP on November 12,2019. He said this project, the tower, is right on page 27. He said this item has been looked at for the funding purpose. He agrees with Mr. Mitchell that land use should be discussed and said this is the right place to discuss it. Mr.Hinz suggested adding a condition related to the slated fencing. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 13 Mr.Marshall said it seems like there are a lot of questions still and it would be a win-win to get some of the questions answered. He said he does not think anyone on the Plan Commission is against having a training center in the city. He said there are too many unanswered questions and stated he does not feel comfortable approving this due to that. Ms. Propp mentioned to Mr.Marshall that he can motion to lay the item over if he chooses to. Mr.Mitchell asked if the neighborhood association across the street was notified about this request. Mr. Lyons replied they were not noticed. Mr. Mitchell asked how Mr. Lyons' staff decides on what they are going to put in the staff report regarding planning documents. He said he is looking the February 22, 2018 future land use map. He said the area is listed as light residential development. He asked why that was not included in the staff's finding. Mr. Lyons said this is a staff report and it is staff includes information they feel is necessary. Mr.Mitchell asked Mr. Lyons why his staff did not feel in a land use decision that a table referencing the future land use of the area is relevant. Mr. Lyons said his staff evaluated this request,based on good planning principals, and thought it was appropriate to include a Planned Development. Ms. Propp said there is a lot going on in this site and wishes there were not a 38-foot tower on the site. She said National Avenue is narrow. She said she also understand this decision has moved forward in many ways. Ms. Propp explained that when Plan Commission reviews a CIP it is not their job to look at individual items. She said to have that authority, a person would have to run for Common Council. She said the location of the tower could be moved to the north but people wouldn't like that either because there are apartments to the north. She stated she will approve this request reluctantly. She commented it is too much going on for too small of a site. Mr. Lyons said he pulled up the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and this parcel is called out for community facilities and not light density residential. Mr.Mitchell said the only land use map provided on the Planning Services Comprehensive Plan webpage is the February 22, 2018 land use map. He asked if there was a disagreement on what the land use of this area should be. Mr. Lyons said the Plan was adopted on October 9,2018. Mr.Perry said he would like to call the question. Ms. Davey confirmed this vote would include the slated fencing condition. ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 14 Plan Commission and staff agreed it would include the additional condition. Final Conditions: 1. BSM to allow 38'4"tall accessory structure inhere code allows a maximum height of 18'. 2. BSM to allow accessory structure in front of the principal structure. 3. Existing fence along National Avenue shall be altered to create a solid screening. Motion carried 7-1 (Ayes:Davey, Ford,Hinz, Kiefer, Perry, Propp and Stengel. Nays:Marshall. Abstain:Mitchell.) ITEM. Rezone&GDP/SIP 221 N.Sawyer St. 15 r 0 32 m Aw 325 M � e M 321 - C r =,zo.� M rn 309 307 303 M M _" 305 x s 303 —f OUT-HLAND-Aal— 1317 N ❑ e2 N E; N N N V N a N M❑,a3 N O 132031.2 -AYZGN-T N na 1319 NAT40NAL—AV—,XX SITE L Mr 0 0 n m o e f to 639 El -F1 EJ Lj aa.s aa.s sa.s sa.s R,4 �a �s ,la.z o o .°• m[ :�j o om a � 1304 1234 1222 121E -/�U S 1317 09 12 1225 1221 1207 077 N _ N lP 1 1 in=0.03 mi tin= 150ft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the Printing Date:6/8/2020 L Oshkosh information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to www.d.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh,WI C:\Users\minak\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User:minak SUBMITTO: City of Oshkosh Dept.of Community Development City 215 Church Ave.,P,O.Box 1130 of Planned Development Application POh,WI 54901 59 Oshkosh HONE For General Development Plan or Specific Implementation Plan "PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK"" APPLICANT INFORMATION Petitioner: Date: Petitioner's Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone#: ( } Email: Contact preference: ❑ Phone )V Email Status of Petitioner(Please Check): ❑Owner presentative ❑Tenant ❑ Prospective Buyer / ems � Petitioner's Signature(required):!a Date:. „ 1DO OWNER INFORMATION Owner's):T.I-r CGS1- Y_r,,[4- Date: Owner(s) Address: Q C l-kA&Ck4- City: Os4 y-al 4 State: W( Zip: O Telephone#: (9;(,)Q- .LOCO Email: Contact preference: ❑ Phone ❑ Email t�Rat}�cF®Cl. CSF� SH wt „US Ownership Status(Please Check):'C Individual ❑Trust ❑ Partnership ❑Corporation Property Owner Consent:(required) By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may,in the performance of their functions,enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: Date: TYPE OF REQUEST: General Development Plan (GDP) ❑ General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) ❑Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) Amendment SITE INFORMATION j Address/Locatlan of Proposed Project: Proposed Project Type: 1>2 i11�1v�1C F/kC} L-t'T�t/ Current Use of Property: !G ( {~7 S S 6"7`-, Zoning: Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: South: East: West: ➢ It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal. ➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal.Make check payable to Clty of Oshkosh. ➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE 13 NON-REFUNDABLE For more information please visit the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm Sign Staff Date Rec'd SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS-Must accompany the application to be complete. (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy) The following information must be provided in order for the application to be considered complete and able to be scheduled for Plan Commission Review. Please use the checklist below to determine the required information to be submitted at the time of application. If ail information below cannot be provided at the time of application, please request a waiver in writing to the Division's Director or designee. ❑ A General Development Plan (GDP)submittal, per Section 30-387(C)(4), shall include the following Items (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy): ❑ General location map of the subject site depicting: • All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the boundaries of the subject property. • Current zoning of the subject site and abutting properties, and the jurisdiction(s) that maintains that control • A graphic scale and north arrow. ❑ Generalized site plan showing the pattern or proposed land uses, including: • General size, shape,and arrangement of lots and specific use areas. • Basic street pattern and pattern of internal drives. • General site grading plan showing preliminary road grades. • Basic storm drainage pattern,including proposed on-site stormwater detention. • General location of recreational and open space areas,including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space. ❑ Statistical data,including: • Minimum lot sizes in the development. • Approximate areas of all lots. • Density/intensity of various parts of the development. • Building coverage. • Landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses. • Expected staging. a Conceptual landscaping plan. ❑ General signage plan. ❑ General outline of property owners association, covenants, easements, and deed restrictions. ❑ A written description of the proposed Planned Development,including: • General project themes and images. • The general mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses. • Approximate residential densities and nonresidential intensities. • General treatment of natural features. • General relationship to nearby properties and public streets. • General relationship of the project to the Comprehensive Plan or other area plans. • Proposed exceptions from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. ❑ Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA),if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning Services, or designee. ❑ A Specific Implementation Plan(SiP) submittal, per Section 30.387(C)(5),shall Include the following Items. Note that the area included in an SIP may be only a portion of the area included in a previously approved GDP (Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy): ❑ An existing conditions map of the subject site depicting the following: • All lands for which the Planned Development is proposed and other lands within 100 feet of the, boundaries of the subject site. • Current zoning of the subject property and all abutting properties, and the jurisdictions) that maintains that control • Existing utilities and recorded easements. • All lot dimensions of the subject site. • A graphic scale and a north arrow. ❑ An SIP map of the proposed site showing at least the following: • Lot layout and the arrangements of buildings. • Public and private roads, driveways,walkways, and parking facilities. • Specific treatment and location of recreational and open space areas,including designation of any such areas to be classified as common open space. 2 ❑ Proposed grading plan. ❑ Specific landscaping plan for the subject site,specifying the location,species, and installation size of plantings. The landscaping plans shall include a table summarizing all proposed species. ❑ Architectural plans for any nonresidential buildings, multi-family structures, or building clusters, of her than conventional single-family or two-family homes on individual lots,in sufficient detail to indicate the floor area, bulk,and visual character of such buildings. ❑ Engineering plans for all water and sewer systems,stormwater systems, roads, parking areas, and walkways. ❑ Signage plan for the project, including all project identification signs, concepts for public fixtures and signs, and group development signage themes that may or may not vary from City standards or common practices. ❑ Specific written description of the proposed SIP including: • Specific project themes and Images. • Specific mix of dwelling unit types and/or land uses. • Specific residential densities and nonresidential intensities as described by dwelling units per acre, and landscaping surface area ratio and/or other appropriate measures of density and intensity. • Specific treatment of natural features,including parkland. • Specific relationship to nearby properties and public streets. • Statistical data on minimum lot sizes in the development,the precise areas of all development lots and pads;density/intensity of various parts of the development; building coverage, and landscaping surface area ratio of all land uses; proposed staging; and any other plans required by Plan Commission. • A statement of rationale as to why PD zoning is proposed.This statement shall list the standard- zoning requirements that, in the applicant's opinion,would inhibit the development project and the opportunities for community betterment that are available through the proposed PD project. • A complete list of zoning standards that would not be met by the proposed SIP and the locafion(s) in which such exceptions/base standard modifications would occur. • Phasing schedule,if more than one development phase is intended. ❑ Agreements, bylaws, covenants, and other documents relative to the operational regulations of the development and particularly providing for the permanent preservation and maintenance of common open areas and amenities. ❑ A written description that demonstrates how the SIP is consistent with the approved GDP and any and all differences between the requirements of the approved GDP and the proposed SIP. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge all required application materials are Included with this application. I am aware that failure to submit the required completed application materials may result In denial or delay of the application request. ' Applicants Signature (required): Date: Ur 3 SUBMITTO: CityP% of Oshkosh Application Dept.of Community Development pp . 215 Church Ave„P.O.Box 1130 city. Oshkosh,Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Oshkosh,Wisconsin54903-1 1 30 Oshkosh PHONE:(920)236-5059 "PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK** APPLICANT INFORMATION Petitioner; aS KCSO Date: �3_aG Petitioner's Address: l o ( coo,/ —r City: O 5 H M S"� state:L.J L Zip:59 Telephone #: (Cp4) H G Email: Mrsti+oL(--qLQ c i.OS14Kns9, Contact preference: © Phone 1gEmail wr. v5 Status of Petitioner(Please Check): ❑Owner MedH!!__❑Tepani ❑Prospective Buyer Petitioner's Signature(required): Date: OWNER INFORMATION , 4 -�._._. Owner's): G� a F- Q S H k l�S H Date: Owners)Address: (S e rf�1�C ( � 1 r�C� City: S(�" State:�_Zip;5uG Telephone#: (qX )_�'�b- 5COG Email:µ ko 11�4 r cl-cs►� µ,Contact preference: ❑ Phone ,Email ter. uS Ownership Status(Please Check): ndlvidual D Trust O Partnership OCorporation Property Owner Consent:(required) By signature hereon,I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may,in the performance of their functions,enter upon the property to Inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application, I also understand that all meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions or other administrative reasons. Property Owner's Signature: Date: ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION c~ r Address/Locatlon of Rezoning Request; ��r-� v• J� �tlYF.r� S� Tax Parcel Number(s): Rezone property from: to Purpose for Rezoning: '-Tb cylra�:zr A Pt A 9- `rVbgg tJ i tJ C 1�f I _t-r L Describe existing property development and land use: P(Z)61? U�E Oil-' 71FF S I7r L/�!} _ _ tJ Ny,ctJAL 6uAyLp (�P_Koa.:,t lJevJ OW id - 9 y r. I`? Y a F G 1J?%054 Describe proposed development and/or proposed land use: I ic_ h no ri7e-_U CL.Ci-16-✓-D AS -104+ CIS ku sA F a r Or PA2'Tm t ns-> ✓zrtl n( of G lu7 Proposed time schedule for development and/or use of the property: Do a.0 o�C) Zoning Adjacent to the Site: North: South: East: West: Sign Staff Date Rec'd DATE: June 3, 2020 TO: Mark Lyons FROM: Mike Stanley SUBJECT: Fire Training Facility 221 North Sawyer Street The City of Oshkosh and the Oshkosh Fire Department have identified the former armory located at 221 North Sawyer Street as the most suitable location for a fire training facility. This determination was partially made based on the recommendations of a contracted study by Matrix Consulting. In 2019, FGM Architects began an Architectural and Engineering study to create plans to redevelop the existing site into a fire department training facility. Phase I of the plan would be to erect a fire department training tower in the South parking lot. This particular location selected because of the wide open,unused parking lot that would allow fire apparatus and firefighters to perform training evolutions without concern of other City vehicles driving through and creating a hazard. Also, it has proximal access to a fire hydrant. This location also fits into the foot traffic flow pattern for the overall development plan of the training facility. Lastly, it also gives close access to the portion of the building that the fire department uses for indoor training evolutions. This tower is a freestanding multi-story structure that is approximately forty feet tall. A Geotechnical Engineering study has been completed by ECS Midwest, LLC. Their findings indicated that a foundation should be placed underneath the tower. The Department of Public Works is facilitating the contract and services to do just that with an immediate start date. The parking lot is fenced on all sides and has an access gate on National Avenue. The fencing will provide more than adequate security for the tower. Additionally, there are lights in the parking lots. On the West side of the parking lot very tall mature leafing trees. In subsequent phases, additional landscaping will be added on the National Avenue as will improved fencing to obscure the view onto the training grounds. The purchase of the drill tower has been approved in the 2020 CIP. Subsequent phases will need to have funding allocated. In the secondary and tertiary phases the entire site will be redeveloped within the existing footprint to become the Oshkosh Fire Department Training Center. Improvements to existing infrastructure, existing structures, and grounds will take place. In the interim implementing Phase I by erecting the drill tower will allow for the fire department to more efficiently, effectively, and safely conduct training within the City of Oshkosh. The tower is not suitable for live fire evolutions. No burning will occur in the tower. I am requesting that the planning commission approve any necessary rezoning or changes to allow moving forward with the project. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. I appreciate your consideration and attention to this matter. y� - - lu r 5 _ if I �wY Nf Ste` c 1 fe: xr. All -,.fir -• .: __ jy� y`h Z LL f IL .r a 4. s In = 0.01 t7}] AI In = 6Qft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification -;T,`, purposes only,and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the Printing Date: 6/�C2Q20 information.Those using the information are responsible for verifying accuracy.For Oshkosh full disclaimer please go to www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GISdisclairner Prepared by:City of Oshkosh,WI a o .V� VOEMN6t „0 ,OZ� o co b o 10. l� y cn N ..0.OZ L O y O O LO A LO N o ” L „O,OZ L L O N Z Y o c t NO „O,OZ ..0 .8E 0 w ..0 .9Z► � L O O co H(7 co 1 8E 0 .Z.96 �� � 3iea �a�ai,��3a �,ew �ypa Xl`NoisnOH-S2i MOl-nNa 319VMAO3=ld _ p ,/a��Np` 61-a33-sl Z-31Hddn b OR N 2.ww WOoN7 S3RiOSS3OOb'HlIM a-yyw-z dNa-,viimvanaat,00 ,y3M01 VMA0311HO.,-b3MOl-nPAO 319Ha?J033b' a ravw-oz wNii-�ylliwans iae � h D�6� N o _ s o o� Q � — — W O - -- - m - - - W so w o 5---- . --- o ---- -- El Q EE W _ > � o O w W O O u as a CD W O Z � Q d d W d d CL W EL W W O O O O O O O O O O O O w a w W W W Z w w „v Q = = o o m H W Z cn Q W O O� J `o O � Z > N 0-,8 0 1-,8£ O O Z Q d N C c7 O W O � w Z � O m � Q „0-01 W G b/£9-,9 b/£9-,9 b/£9-,9 b/£9 0;8 8 Z CL O C. c7 W > W _ z Q O m - j J W Q _- � 3iea �a�ai,��3a �,ew �ypa Xl`NoisnOH-S2i MOl-nNa 319VMAO3=ld _ p ,/a��Np` 61-a33-sl Z-31Hddn b OR N 2.ww WOoN7 S3RiOSS3OOb'HlIM a-yyw-z dNa-,viimvanaat,00 ,y3M01 VMA0311HO.,-b3MOl-nPAO 319Ha?J033b' a ravw-oz wNii-�ylliwans iae � h D�6� N o _ s o o� Q � — — W O - -- - m - - - W so w o 5---- . --- o ---- -- El Q EE W _ > � o O w W O O u as a CD W O Z � Q d d W d d CL W EL W W O O O O O O O O O O O O w a w W W W Z w w „v Q = = o o m H W Z cn Q W O O� J `o O � Z > N 0-,8 0 1-,8£ O O Z Q d N C c7 O W O � w Z � O m � Q „0-01 W G b/£9-,9 b/£9-,9 b/£9-,9 b/£9 0;8 8 Z CL CL O C. c7 O W_ W > W _ z Q HIM O m - j J Q _- REZONE/GDP/SIP ANDY K/MILH P YANG BARBARA J SPANBAUER 221 N SAWYER ST 1229 NATIONAL AVE 1235 NATIONAL AVE PC:06-16-20 OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902 DAVID J/JANET ZERBE LOMBARD SOUTHLAND PROPERTIES LLC LOURDES ACADEMY OF OSHKOSH WI INC 1217 NATIONAL AVE 230 OHIO ST 200 250 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902 MARY A D'ANGELO PHILLIP A/JUNE E BAKER RAJA PROPERTIES LLC 1223 NATIONAL AVE 230 N SAWYER ST 251 N SAWYER ST OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902 RANDALL HENTZ/SHARON HANSEN SUBLUXATION PROPERTIES LLC WINNEBAGO COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY 1305 NATIONAL AVE 155 N SAWYER ST PO BOX 397 OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54903 CITY OF OSHKOSH PO BOX 1130 OSHKOSH WI 54903 _ - ■■ �� �■ �� III■1■11 ■IIEIIII■ � • ��■ •i ■■ ■■ ■111111111 �■u■■■�■ ■■r■ 11■� ■u ■■ ■ ■■1111111 u11■IE�■11111 I■11■ IIIII IIIII ■�r11��■1 � ■'� ii ii � =mil, ■■- ii� _, � _ME �11 i■ N■ ■■' ■■ ■one SUBJECT �� �� ■111111 SITE • moll IEEE 1�: 1■1■ �■1■ _ � m �i • '���" . u11111■EE 1■111 _ � i�ii■�u -■ - •. _ .II■ IIIII w i ■ ...... . _ III _ _ NOW _ u� may; ■�- `� � ��- ��� � ■■■111111MII ■�r - ■1■■11■1 ■I IIIII MEMO IM ���i.�i■ •.,I�_ �A 0.09 1• 11 ft PrintingCity of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general idenfificabon purposes only,and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the informatJon. Those using the Date: • 1 1 information .. • . . . • . •• . ;pit 04. - a - 1- i r 1 E�" * — IfW` r IAI _I � YY 3 c ,! r... tom` � 1 I I A ^A., Alp ri ltl i µ o, r , .b 7 p r ?7 _ N ))11 d Jr1_\YlYEIII J 1in=0.02mi tin= 120ft City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the Printing Date:6/3/2020 Oshkosh information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to �J hh l www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh,WI nS hLsl C:\Users\minak\Desktop\2020 Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd User:minak