HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem I STAFF REPORT BOARD OF APPEALS
DECEMBER 11TH,2019
ITEM I: 3809 SHOREBIRD COURT
GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Timothy L. Zillges-owner, Thomas L. Zillges-petitioner, requests the following variance
to permit a single family dwelling in the shore yard setback:
Description Code Reference Required Proposed
Adjustment of
Shore Yard Setback 30-160.5(A)(2)(b) 75' (Avg adjacent lots)50'
The subject 0.37 acre (approximately 16,130 square feet) property is zoned Single Family
Residential-3 within a Planned Development Overlay (SR-3 PD) and is currently
undeveloped. The pie-shaped parcel is located on the southwest side of Shorebird Court.
Adjacent land uses to the subject parcel include single-family residential in all
directions.
ANALYSIS
In reviewing a variance request,the following questions should be addressed:
When considering an area variance, the question of whether unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty exists is best explained as "whether
compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing area, set
backs, frontage, height, bulk or density would unreasonably prevent
the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or would
render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome."
Are there any unusual or unique physical limitations of the property which
create a hardship?
Will granting of a variance result in harm to the public interest?
The applicant is proposing to construct a new 2,618 square feet home on the subject
property for residential land use purposes. Since the property abuts Lake Butte des
Morts there are additional Shoreland Overlay standards applicable to the property. The
standards are intended to regulate navigable waters as well as limit certain land use
activities detrimental to shorelands. Normally a 50' setback from the ordinary high-
water mark is required for new structures (see Section 30-16.5(A)(1)). However, since the
abutting two lots are developed the code requires a distance greater than or equal to the
average setback of the principal buildings on these developed lots (i.e. 75' in this case).
Therefore, a 25' dimensional variance is needed from the required shore yard (west)
setback to construct the proposed home (see submitted site plan). The proposed two-
story contemporary-style home would feature three-bedrooms and a 720 square feet
attached garage. Vehicular access would occur via a curb cut on the north side of the
STAFF REPORT BOARD OF APPEALS
ITEM I -2- DECEMBER 11TH,2019
parcel leading to the side load garage. Meanwhile a proposed 200 square feet at-grade
patio would provide secondary ingress/egress to the home as well as outdoor
recreational use of the shore yard area.
The applicant has submitted an illustration with the application showing the required
shore yard setback in proximity to the proposed built improvements. The required shore
yard setback and the required front/street yard setback are creating a pinch point on the
parcel and leave a diminutive by-right building area. This document shows no feasible
alternatives are present for a by-right building envelope on the subject parcel without
some variance and complying with the standards would be unnecessarily burdensome
in this instance. This document also helps depict the unique physical property limitation
(e.g. proximity to 100-year floodplain/ordinary high water mark) on the lot that is
creating justifiable hardship.
While the proposed location does require variance it appears to be the least visually
impactful area on the site and the immediate neighborhood. First, the proposed two-
story design is attempting to maximize the functional footprint of the home while
achieving size and density benchmarks required by the neighborhood covenants for
new dwellings. Second, the proposed 200 square feet at-grade patio will allow the
subject parcel to utilize the area for outdoor recreational purposes while maintaining a
negligible profile and uninterrupted viewscapes from the neighboring properties.
Overall, there will be no harm to the public interest with this plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the information provided within this report, staff recommends approval of the
variance as requested.
Attachment to BOA Packet 12/11/19
3809 Shorebird Court
I I
i
' Jf/
o,
fi
ai
e�
m
Nlr yr
r
X
4'
t
r
C ul�Itl�i��
AWA
View of subject property looking southwest
Page 3
Attachment to BOA Packet 12/11/19
3809 Shorebird Court
ff
in
M
r„
µ
t
View from subject property looking south
Page 4
Attachment to BOA Packet 12/11/19
3809 Shorebird Court
Ma
iR
View from subject property looking east
Page 5
Attachment to BOA Packet 12/11/19
3809 Shorebird Court
dry.
U
�n
4 x
s i 4xu
m
r,
a
1 f
View from subject property looking north
Page 6
Please Tyne or Print in BLACK INK Return to: Department of
Community Development
OIFCl1 I 215 Church Ave.
On 1H[VMt[N
P.O.Box 1130
Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130
CITY OF OSHKOSH
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
Please submit a complete reproducible site plan (maximum size 11" x 17"). (A complete site plan includes,but is not
limited to, all structures, lot lines and streets with distances to each.)Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee.
FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE. The fee is payable to the City of Oshkosh and due at the time the application is submitted.
Address of Parcel Affected: 3809 SHOREBIRD COURT OSHKOSH WI 54904
Petitioner: THOMAS ZILLGES Home Phone: 920-379-9923
Petitioner's Address: 3815 SHOREBIRD COURT Work Phone:
Signature Required; Date: 10/16/2019
Owner(if not petitioner): TIMOTHY ZILLGES Home Phone: 920-376-1000
Owner's Address: 8699 NEWMANN LANE LARSEN WI Work Phone:
Signature Required: EE Date: 10/16/2019
In order to be granted a variance, each applicant must be able to prove that an unnecessary hardship would be created if
the variance is not granted.The burden of proving an unnecessary hardship rests upon the applicant. The attached sheet
provides information on what constitutes a hardship. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary,to provide the information
requested. Additional information may be requested as needed.)
1. Explain your proposed plans and why you are requesting a variance:
I AM THINKING OF BUILDING A NEW HOUSE ON THIS LOT. I NEED TO HAVE A 50 FOOT
SET BACK FROM THE HIGH WATER MARK TO GET THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE (SQ.FEET)
REQUIRED BY COVENANTS OF THIS SUBDIVISION. THE SET BACK CURRENTLY IS
75 FT FROM THE HIGH WATER MARK.
Page 7
2, Describe how the variance would not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties:
I OWN THE HOUSE AND LOT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE WEST SIDE OF THIS
LOT AND I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE SET BACK. THE BACK SIDE OF THIS LOT
IS MARSH WHICH IS COMPLETELY UNBUILDABLE. THIS LOT HAS BEEN FOR SALE
FOR OVER 10 YEARS.
3. Describe the special conditions that apply to your lot or structure that do not apply to surrounding lots of-
structures:
IN ORDER TO BUILD A HOUSE ON THIS LOT I NEED A 50 FOOT SET BACK WHICH
WOULD REQUIRE A VARIANCE. THE HOUSE ON EITHER SIDE HAS A 75 FOOT
SET BACK AND I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 50 FOOT SET BACK.
4. Describe the hardship that would result if your variance were not granted:
THINK WITH OUT THE 50 FOOT SET BACK THE LOT IS UNBUILDABLE AND THERE
WILL BE MININMAL DEPTH TO BUILD A HOUSE. THIS WILL DEPRIVE ME OF THE ABILITY
TO BUILD A HOUSE.
Page 8
o �
�I a'
fA Nl
CIO
1
i
f .d
J
E� d
JrS
a
V�� �' �
BYAPPLICANT
Page 9
rc
m
-------------
,r
�i
Page 10
6 10z/0e/6 ::��JF-NOUVAglg
9 1 9z-� /.d99N0 lNl
o0
6A
I Hill
00
I
N<
Page 11
6 10 To-- /6 [D OS 1 2-� I
g 19Z�� /W99NOI 9N1]l
OL
F1
K-
i 4 n
Ie
hIA
y 3
�I4
dU °�
U
0 5I4 �e
n =h
d
qulo
u
r�
Page 12
6 I oVoe/G ' -t7 112J001� CINz .
aaa
Nib
yu>
Q b
_ O O
o � O O
Bm
Ox O'
V' 4.5 fix F a_3 r»'C..� j fi"``3l �,y
Ems✓ i vas s 4' v�- h. €v�G's�b';
Page 13
BOA RYAN W/MEAGHAN REDDY MICHAEL L/LISA A SCOTT
3809 SHOREBIRD CT 2440 SHORE PRESERVE DR 3805 SHOREBIRD CT
12-11-19 OSHKOSH WI 54904 OSHKOSH WI 54904
TIMOTHY L ZILLGES THOMAS L ZILLGES REV TRUST NORTHSHORE PROP.OWNERS ASSOC INC
8699 NEUMAN LN 3815 SHOREBIRD CT 3865 SHOREBIRD CT
LARSEN WI 54947 OSHKOSH WI 54904 OSHKOSH WI 54904
Page 14
38 � '
op ,
psp�S
p' T 0
/ �2s pp
�a O C \
m
� cry
1 06
Kati s�
ti �a
00
oo. �tQ so 10
oo, sp p 113 c,6
1y010 1 \\
A
0�0 00 o Q
('') w
60• � S
3!o p0
26.00
P
m
N ,
4
6 G
3
3344
N 1 in=0.01 mi
1 in=70ft
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,andXI y
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date: 11l8l2019 CSIICC)Sl
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer Prepared by:City of Oshkosh,WI
J:\GIS\Planning\Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template\Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mO a ge 15 User:katieb
4 i
� a
a s �
3
INi
i
Alt
"� T
r _
K
M
x p
a e Sk
y
.
rn,i �y` N
1 in=0.01 mi �
�.. r
1 in=70 ft F-
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and C H
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date: 11/8/2019 � ��
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/GlSdisclaimer Prepared by: City of Oshkosh, WI
7GISRanningRan Commission Site Plan Map Template\Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxIP age 16 User:katieb
Iz ..........
Y
45
T--
.................... ...........
..... ................ S
0
SR-5 DR-6-PD
MULTIPLE
SMU-P
MR-12-PD
I-PD UP
$R';5-P-D
A
V MR-12-PD
45
SR-3= D
UI-PD
8R.5
ti
II Q
CID
NMU-PD
.............................
....... .
..........
N
I in 0.15 mi
4 1 in=800 ft
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and city-
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date: 11/8/2019
www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/G]Sdisclaimer Prepared by:City of Oshkosh, WI Oshkosh
J:\GIGPlanningRan Commission Site Plan Map TemplateRan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxdP age 17 User:katieb