HomeMy WebLinkAbout09. 15-595 NOVEMBER 26, 2019 19-595 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OUTDOOR
STORAGE USE AT 36 EAST 10TH AVENUE
INITIATED BY: VINTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved w/ conditions
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission finds that the Conditional Use Permit for an
outdoor storage use at 36 E. 101h Avenue, is consistent with the criteria established in
Section 30-382(F)(3) of the Oshkosh Zoning Ordinance; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that a conditional use permit is hereby approved for an outdoor storage use at
36 E. 101h Avenue, per the attached, with the following conditions:
1. All materials being stored on site must be removed from the site within 2 years.
2. The storage area must be enclosed with minimum 8' tall solid fencing.
3. The site must be watered during crushing operations and general operations to
mitigate dust.
4. East 91h Avenue must be watered during crushing operations and general
operations to mitigate dust.
5. Debris must be removed from the East 91h Avenue public right-of-way
6. East 91h Avenue must be maintained and any damages must be repaired by the
applicant.
7. Nothing may be stored within 10' of the storm sewer and water main and
minimum 4' tall jersey style fencing must be installed 10' from the water main on
both sides (east and west) to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20'
wide area.
Oshkosh
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
DATE: November 21, 2019
RE: Approve Conditional Use Permit for an Outdoor Storage Use at 36 East 10th
Avenue (Plan Commission Recommends Approval)
BACKGROUND
The 3.7 acre site is located on the east side of N. Main Street with frontage along E. 9th Avenue
and E. 10th Avenue. The site consists of an approximately 56,993 sq. ft. industrial building
(Sadoff Iron and Supply) and associated gravel parking/storage area to the rear (east) of the
building. The surrounding area consists of a mixture of commercial and industrial uses.
ANALYSIS
The petitioner is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to use the existing gravel area
to the east of the building for recycling of construction materials such as concrete and asphalt.
According to the applicant the raw material will be stockpiled and processed into base course
material used on construction projects. The outdoor storage area will exceed 500 sq. ft. in area,
therefore, it will require a Conditional Use Permit.
The proposed storage area was previously used to stockpile and stage various metals for
recycling and the area is enclosed with chain link and slatted fencing. The applicant (Vinton
Construction) is currently storing their materials on the lot immediately to the north of the
subject site, across E. 9th Avenue. According to the applicant, the traffic operations of trucks
entering and exiting the site for delivery of material will be similar to previous operations.
Staff is in support of the proposed outdoor storage use on a temporary basis and is
recommending a condition that the materials must be removed from the site within two years.
Staff is also recommending a condition that the storage area be completely enclosed with 8' tall
solid fencing, per screening requirements for outdoor storage land uses.
Based on the applicant's current practices at their existing location, staff is requesting that the
applicant be required to water the site as well as E. 9th Avenue during crushing operations and
general opperations to mitigate concerns related to dust. Staff is also requesting that the
City Hall,215 Church Avenue P 0 Box 1 130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130 920 236 5000 http//www ci oshkosh wi us
applicant be required to remove any debris from the public right-of-way, maintain E. 9th
Avenue and repair any damages caused by truck circulation to/from the site.
The Department of Public Works reviewed the proposal is requesting a condition that storage
be prohibited 10' either way of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4' tall jersey
barrier style fencing be installed to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20' wide area.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of a Conditional Use Permit with findings and
conditions at its November 19, 2019 meeting.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved:
/11(k �C
Mark Lyons Mark A. Rohloff
Planning Services Manager City Manager
City Hall,215 Church Avenue P 0 Box 1 130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130 920 236 5000 http//www ci oshkosh wi us
ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR AN
OUTDOOR STORAGE USE AT 36 E. 101h AVENUE
Plan Commission meeting of November 19,2019.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Vinton Construction Company
Owner: Sadoff Iron and Metal Company
Action(s) Requested:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish an outdoor storage use on a
previously developed lot.
Applicable Ordinance Provisions:
Outdoor Storage land uses are permitted only through a Conditional Use Permit in the Heavy
Industrial District(HI) as regulated in Section 30-61 (C) of the Zoning Ordinance. Criteria used
for Conditional Use Permits are located in Section 30-382 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Property Location and Background Information:
The 3.7 acre site is located on the east side of N.Main Street with frontage along E. 91h Avenue
and E. 10rh Avenue. The site consists of an approximately 56,993 sq.ft. industrial building
(Sadoff Iron and Supply) and associated gravel parking/storage area to the rear (east) of the
building. The surrounding area consists of a mixture of commercial and industrial uses.
Subject Site:
Industrial HI
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
tsti tie ;�
North Vacant RMU
South Industrial HI
West Commercial&Industrial HI
ria47 Vacant/railroad RMU-RFO
r
C"vrr .ehens% eivaz Viand;Use Icornaricvn _._, , rots _. ,:. _.
2040 Corn rehensive Land Use Plan Recommendation Center City
ANALYSIS
The petitioner is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to use the existing gravel area
to the east of the building for recycling of construction materials such as concrete and asphalt.
According to the applicant the raw material will be stockpiled and processed into base course
material used on construction projects. The outdoor storage area will exceed 500 sq. ft.in area,
therefore, it will require a Conditional Use Permit.
The proposed storage area was previously used to stockpile and stage various metals for
recycling and the area is enclosed with chain link and slatted fencing. The applicant(Vinton
Construction) is currently storing their materials on the lot immediately to the north of the
subject site, across E. 9th Avenue. According to the applicant, the traffic operations of trucks
entering and exiting the site for delivery of material will be similar to previous operations.
Staff is in support of the proposed outdoor storage use on a temporary basis and is
recommending a condition that the materials must be removed from the site within two (2)
years. Staff is also recommending a condition that the storage area be completely enclosed with
8' tall solid fencing, per screening requirements for outdoor storage land uses.
Based on the applicant's current practices at their existing location, staff is requesting that the
applicant be required to water the site as well as E. 9th Avenue during crushing operations to
mitigate concerns related to dust. Staff is also requesting that the applicant be required to
remove any debris from the public right-of-way,maintain E. 91h Avenue and repair any
damages caused by truck circulation to/from the site.
The Department of Public Works reviewed the proposal is requesting a condition that storage
be prohibited 10' either way of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4' tall chain link
fencing be installed to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20' wide area (see aerial
view below).
e b
NEW
n :=7
a .. 7
i
r „
r
,
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E. I V'Ave. 2
RECOMMENDATION/CONDITIONS
In its review and recommendation to the Common Council on an application for a Conditional
Use Permit, staff recommends the Plan Commission make the following findings based on the
criteria established by Chapter 30-382(17)(3):
(1) Is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
(2) Would not result in a substantial or undue adverse impact on nearby property, the
character of the neighborhood, environmental factors, traffic factors, parking, public
improvements, public property or rights-of-way, or other matters affecting the public
health, safety, or general welfare.
(3) Maintains the desired consistency of land uses, land use intensities, and land use
impacts as related to the environs of the subject property.
(4) The conditional use is located in an area that will be adequately served by, and will not
impose an undue burden on, any of the improvements, facilities, utilities or services
provided by public or private agencies serving the subject property.
(5) The potential public benefits outweigh any potential adverse impacts of the proposed
conditional use, after taking into consideration the applicant's proposal and any
requirements recommended by the applicant to ameliorate such impacts.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit for an outdoor storage area
at 36 E. 101h Avenue as proposed with the findings listed above and the following conditions:
1. All materials being stored on site must be removed from the site within 2 years.
2. The storage area must be enclosed with minimum 8' tall solid fencing.
3. The site must be watered during crushing operations to mitigate dust.
4. East 9th Avenue must be watered during crushing operations to mitigate dust.
5. Debris must be removed from the East 91h Avenue public right-of-way
6. East 91h Avenue must be maintained and any damages must be repaired by the
applicant.
7. Nothing may be stored within 10' of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4'
tall chain link fencing must be installed 10' from the water main on both sides (east and
west) to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20' wide area.
The Plan Commission approved of the Conditional Use Permit as requested with findings and
conditions noted. The following is the Plan Commissions discussion on this item.
Site Inspections: Report: Mr.Hinz and Ms. Propp reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish an outdoor storage use on a
previously developed lot.
Mr. Slusarek presented the item and reviewed the site and surrounding area as well as the land
use and zoning classifications in this area. The petitioner is requesting approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to use the existing gravel area to the east of the building for recycling of
construction materials such as concrete and asphalt. According to the applicant the raw
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E.10i'Ave. 3
material will be stockpiled and processed into base course material used on construction
projects. The proposed storage area was previously used to stockpile and stage various metals
for recycling and the area is enclosed with chain link and slatted fencing. The applicant is
currently storing their materials on the lot immediately to the north of the subject site, across E.
9th Avenue. According to the applicant, the traffic operations of trucks entering and exiting the
site for delivery of material will be similar to previous operations. The Department of Public
Works reviewed the proposal is requesting a condition that storage be prohibited 10' either way
of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4' tall chain link fencing be installed to
prevent materials from encroaching into the 20' wide area. He said staff recommends approval
of the proposed Conditional Use Permit for an outdoor storage area at 36 E. 10th Avenue as
proposed with the findings and conditions as listed in the staff report.
Ms. Propp opened up technical questions to staff.
Mr.Hinz stated he knows the request is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan but was
curious how the relatively new Sawdust District would impact the area.
Mr. Lyons replied it is why staff put a two year clause in the conditions. He said staff
understands the applicant has an immediate need. He said after two years, it should give
enough time for the District to evolve and redevelop the area.
Mr. Coulibaly inquired about the term limitation and future plans for the area.
Mr. Lyons explained it is because of the long-range plan of the Sawdust District as a
redevelopment area. He reiterated the applicant has an immediate need but the plan is to find
them a permanent site elsewhere.
Ms. Propp stated she was confused because the land is owned by Sadoff Iron and Metal
Company but it is Vinton Construction who will be storing the materials which is basically the
same stuff they are storing to the north.
Mr. Lyons replied correct. He explained the property to the north is owned by the City and the
City is looking to have the materials removed from the property as redevelopment and an RFP
goes out for redevelopment of the site.
Ms.Propp stated she drove past the site many times and it did not look appealing. She said
there were big tall mounds.
Mr. Lyons reiterated that is why staff added the two year clause as a condition. He again stated
the applicant has an immediate need but understands it is not going to be long term.
Ms. Propp questioned if Vinton Construction will be leasing the property.
Mr. Lyons replied he does not know the specifics.
Ms.Propp asked if the request is approved,the materials would be moved temporarily.
Mr. Lyons replied affirmatively.
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E.IIY'Ave. 4
Ms. Propp asked if a new fence would be installed around Sadoff to replace the current
disrepaired fence.
Mr. Lyons explained part of the requirement for outdoor storage is that code requires 8' solid
fencing.
Ms. Propp asked if the current slated fencing was considered a solid fence.
Mr. Lyons explained there are certain types of slated fencing that are considered solid fencing
such as interwoven fencing.
Mr. Lyons and Mr. Slusarek stated there is a 90%opacity requirement.
Ms. Propp asked if in theory,the current fence would be replaced.
Mr. Lyons replied the applicant will need at a minimum to add the required fencing which is
the 8' solid fencing.
Ms. Propp opened up the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any
statements.
Bill Vashon,3920 Jenkel Terrace in Green Bay (applicant), stated he is an environmental scientist
for Vinton Construction. He said this is a short-term storage and they are currently looking for
a long-term crushing location in the city. He said the city is asking them to move their materials
and he said hopefully by the spring the materials will be gone and they will have a new
permanent site. He believes it will take less than two year to relocate.
Ms. Propp stated there is an awful lot of stuff at the current site. She inquired what will happen
with the materials at the current site.
Mr.Vashon replied all the materials will get moved. He explained they are done with the 2019
season. He explained there is a large portion of material that is owned by the city. He stated
their materials are on the west end which is the material that will be relocated.
Ms. Propp commented the city would move their own material.
Mr. Vashon replied he thinks with the demolition project to the north, the city would be using
the materials as backfill material.
Mr. Lyons added from his understanding,the City has acquired some of the properties to the
north of the location and would need fill after the demolition process.
Mr.Kiefer asked if Mr. Vashon was agreeable to the fence around the water main.
Mr. Vashon stated he would prefer a jersey barrier over the 4' chain link fence. He explained
chain link fence would not hold material if a backhoe or end loader was scooping it. He said it
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E. 10"Ave. 5
would push through the chain link fence. He said if there was a jersey barrier,it would prevent
that from happening.
Mr. Lyons commented they could amend the condition.
Mr. Mitchell asked how long debris has been stored in that area.
Mr. Vashon replied about six to eight years.
Mr.Mitchell asked during that time,how many times or has any sort of environmental review
or water quality contamination assessment been done.
Mr. Vashon replied to his knowledge, there hasn't been any environmental release on the
property during Vinton Construction's time on the property that would require such an
environmental audit or investigation.
Mr. Mitchell asked if there was any sort of assessment that has ever been done due to the
proximity of the lake where it could have a potential to pollute or have a water quality impact.
Mr.Vashon questioned what specific materials Mr. Mitchell was referring to.
Mr.Mitchell said asphalt, which has potential contaminates and concrete can as well. He said
he was not sure what other materials were being stored on the site.
Mr.Vashon said the typical construction materials are pretty neutral as far as contaminates that
could be concerning to impacts to ground water or surface water. He said the biggest issue is
dust but that is more of a nuisance complaint during crushing. He explained the crushing
operations are set up to have water during the crushing. He said if there are issues with dust on
the roads,water would be applied. He said he would have to do an environmental audit and
clean up for certain things like a transmission oil pan going in the truck,but that has not
occurred since they have been in the yard.
Bob Reinke, 900 S.Main Street, said he has been involved with the dirt end of the deal because
unfortunately Vinton has done their best but they don't do anything as far as killing the dust,
sweeping the road, watering the road or patching the road. He said he has complained
numerous times but can never find who to blame. He questioned why Vinton is not using the
10th Avenue entrance from Sadoff's property. He explained that 10th Avenue is concrete and can
hold up better than 9th Avenue which is asphalt. He stated he deals with the dust daily and has
called to complain to Darlene Brandt(Grants Coordinator for the City of Oshkosh). He said Ms.
Brandt has done her best to talk to the people at Vinton and Vinton has talked to their
subcontractors who are supposed to water the road and sweep the road. He stated it falls on
deaf ears. He said the conditions that have to be met for the Conditional Use Permit will not be
met by Vinton.
Mr. Coulibaly asked if Mr.Reinke's main concerns were the dust and for Vinton to use 10th
Avenue.
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E.10"Ave. 6
Mr. Reinke explained 1011,Avenue is concrete and 91h Avenue is asphalt. He said there are 30-40
trucks daily during the busy season. He said they do not water the road. He said the road
should be watered at least once every two hours. He said it is watered once maybe at 6:00am
and at the end of the day but nothing in-between. He said they have yet to sweep the roads and
when they do sweep it, they sweep it onto his driveway. He understands that they have to do
what they have to do but would like them to be neighborly and at least kill the dust.
Ms. Propp questioned if the conditions would be met.
Mr. Reinke replied the conditions have not been met yet. He suggested to contact Ms. Brandt to
find out how many times he has called. He stated he has talked to subcontractors, truckers, etc.
about the dust and they all blow him off. He stated when Vinton is there crushing, they do a
great job but the problem is when the material is being brought in and leaving or the
subcontractors are the one that are falling short.
There were no other public comments on this item.
Ms. Propp closed the public hearing and asked if the applicant wanted to make any closing
statements.
Mr. Vashon stated he does not have firsthand knowledge about the sweeping activities and
putting materials into Mr. Reinke's driveway. He said if that is occurring,it should not be
occurring. He said the material should be swept back into the yard. He said this is news to him
and he will take it up with the area managers.
Mr. Coulibaly asked about the dust issues and using 1O1h Avenue as the access point.
Mr.Vashon said if it is a condition Plan Commission would like to add to use 101h Avenue, it
would not be a problem.
Mr.Mitchell said the condition states it must be watered during crushing but asked Mr. Vashon
if there was anything that could be done during the loading and unloading process.
Mr.Vashon explained the process of intake. He said the crushing operation starts when enough
material has been built up and there is watering during the crushing process. He explained the
road could dry out during the day depending on the weather. He said it sounds like they need
to do a better job sweeping and with the water application to the stock pile and yard itself.
Mr. Mitchell asked if Mr.Vashon would be opposed to adding watering during the unloading
and loading process.
Mr. Vashon said he would not be opposed to it.
Mr. Mitchell said one issue from Mr. Reinke was he did not know who to go to with issues. He
asked if there was a point of contact for Mr. Reinke.
Item—CUPIOutdoor Storage—36 E.10'Ave. 7
Mr.Vashon said they would provide a point of contact to the city and they can give it out to
people who request it. He said it is a Conditional Use Permit and if the conditions are not met,
they would not get the permit.
Motion by Perry to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Conditions:
1. All materials being stored on site must be removed from the site within 2 years.
2. The storage area must be enclosed with minimum 8'tall solid fencing.
3. The site must be watered during crushing operations to mitigate dust.
4. East 9th Avenue must be watered during crushing operations to mitigate dust.
5. Debris must be removed from the East 9th Avenue public right-of-way
6. East 9th Avenue must be maintained and any damages must be repaired by the applicant.
7. Nothing may be stored within 10'of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4'
tall chain link fencing must be installed 10'from the water main on both sides (east and
west) to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20'wide area.
Seconded by Hinz.
Ms. Propp asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Plan Commission members and staff discussed amending conditions #3, #4 and#7.
Mr. Ford arrived at 4:24pm.
Ms. Propp asked if there was any reason why Plan Commission should not condition limiting
the applicant to using loth Avenue.
Mr. Gierach said there is no reason not to use loth Avenue since it was just reconstructed in the
last ten years. He said loth Avenue would be easier to tell when it needs to be cleaned.
Mr.Kiefer asked it would make sense for them to keep using 9th Avenue since this is only a
temporary situation. He said 9th Avenue would take the wear instead of loth Avenue,which is a
newer street.
Mr. Gierach stated it would be his preference to keep using 91h Avenue but understands it
doesn't help the neighbors at all. He said with the Sawdust District, 9th Avenue will be
reconstructed in the near future. He said he would prefer the wear on 9th Avenue but knows
that loth Avenue can handle the wear as well.
Mr.Mitchell commented there are neighbors on loth Avenue as well and it could be the same
issue but at a different neighbor.
Ms.Propp said personally she does not know if they should move it to loth Avenue based on
the testimonies.
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E.10°i Ave. 8
Mr. Coulibaly commented it would be good if they do something to mitigate the dust on 9th
Avenue.
Motion by Mitchell to amend conditions #3, #4 and#7 to state:
3. The site must be watered during crushing operations and general operations to mitigate
dust.
4. East 9th Avenue must be watered during crushing operations and general operations to
mitigate dust.
7. Nothing may be stored within 10'of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4'
tall jersey style fencing must be installed 10'from the water main on both sides (east and
west) to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20'wide area.
Seconded by Erickson to amend the conditions.
Motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Fojtik arrived at 4:30pm.
Mr. Mitchell commented he appreciates Mr.Vashon's follow-up on water quality and he is
confident that Sadoff is doing excellent work with environmental protections. He said no
polluter admits to polluting. He said there has never been an assessment. He asked if there
was any requirement from the city to implement water quality protections.
Mr. Lyons replied those would be done through the Department of Natural Resources for any
type of water quality analysis and environmental impact.
Mr. Mitchell asked if the City didn't care. He questioned if the DNR didn't think it was
necessary, should the City feel the same.
Mr. Lyons explained the City usually does not have any jurisdictions to make those things
happen. He said the Department of Natural Resources,Army Corps of Engineers, etc. are the
entities that do have regulations and enforcement options for those things. He stated it is not
that the City does not care.
Mr. Mitchell asked if the applicant needs to get a DNR permit to be able to store. He also asked
if the DNR was aware of this storage taking place.
Mr. Lyons said they may need an air permit but it is something staff can follow-up on.
Mr. Davis said one of the issues he sees here is that it has always been hard surface and usually
the DNR does not get involved unless they are changing it from a green surface to a hard
surface. He said he was not sure if the DNR would even regulate it. He said they have a
threshold of disturbing 20,000 sq. ft.before the city does a drainage review of the property. He
said there has been rubble on the site since he has been at the city and he does not know what
the plan was before that. He said the complaints he has received were due to the puddles and
drainage not due to water quality. He said he believes they do require the applicant to protect
Item-CUP/Outdoor Storage-36 E.10'Ave. 9
all the inlets on the site. He stated that is the best answer he can give for an impervious surface
going to an impervious surface.
Mr.Mitchell asked if the city has limits or imposes any sort of requirements besides fencing for
storage even if the materials being stored may pollute the ground.
Mr. Lyons reiterated it is typically something the DNR does.
Mr.Mitchell asked if the city does anything.
Mr. Lyons stated it is not a zoning related issue so they do not regulate it through the land use
regulation.
Mr.Davis commented from his experience it has come up because of an elicit discharge but did
not know who followed-up with elicit discharges.
Mr. Lyons said it is not something that is regulated with the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr.Mitchell requested for Mr.Vashon to speak again. He said the city does not regulate the
environmental issue and that the DNR does. He asked if the DNR is involved in any of the
storage of materials.
Mr. Vashon replied the DNR is not involved. He said there is not really any type of chemical
found in the materials even the recycled asphalt. He explained the DNR does regulate the
crushing by the air permit and that is why there is a requirement for dust mitigation. He said
the only time the department would get involved is if they had a release on a gravel surface
over five gallons which would require DNR notification. He said if it were on an impervious
surface,it would have to be over 25 gallons. He said it is really the equipment that carries the
oils whereas the material is a natural occurring product. He said in his opinion the
environmental impact would be due to the equipment not the material. He said they have spill
kits for the equipment, do audits and have environmental investigations.
Mr.Mitchell asked if the city would have to do an assessment on the previous site to the north
before developing such as soil borings to see if there is a potential issue. He said if there is an
issue due to the materials, what would be the recourse.
Mr. Lyons replied if there was a contaminant on that site due to the crushing, they would work
with the DNR.
Mr. Mitchell questioned if it should be a condition to address any potential contaminate issue.
Mr. Lyons explained the current CUP laws in the State of Wisconsin state that conditions can
only be place if it is directly related to the land use and activity of it. He said typically
environmental have not been legally been found to be those unless it is something directly
related to water runoff or something of that nature. He said the land use activity of storage has
not been seen to have those types of impacts. He said staff worked with legal on some other
potential language but were told they could only add conditions based on the activity which is
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E.10°i Ave. 10
crushing and storage. He said getting into environmental is not legally standing under the
current CUP laws.
Motion carried 8-0-1 (Abstained:Fojtik) to approve the initial motion.
Final conditions to state:
1. All materials beingstored on site must be removed om the site within 2 ears.
.�" y
2. The storage area must be enclosed with minimum 8 tall solid fencing.
3. The site must be watered during crushing operations and general operations to mitigate
dust.
4. East 9th Avenue must be watered during crushing operations and general operations to
mitigate dust.
5. Debris must be removed from the East 9th Avenue public right-of-way
6. East 9th Avenue must be maintained and any damages must be repaired by the applicant.
7. Nothing may be stored within 10'of the storm sewer and water main and minimum 4'
tall jersey style fencing must be installed 10'from the water main on both sides (east and
west) to prevent materials from encroaching into the 20'wide area.
Item—CUP/Outdoor Storage—36 E.10'Ave. 11
City of Oshkosh AppiiaaflonCqndMonal
Oshkosh
AEFUCAIR IN7 MMW {
Petitioner - '-- Ut�t — ' .
-
Petitioner's Address: =
Telephone#: 2t}1 t C.sats #meter "Pfra�
Stratus of Petitioner(Please Check): ,,Owner Representative ATenorit o f?ospdcnvd awbe
Petitioner's S6gnoture(required): MOW.
t�W�dER-l�f�t? 7iC3Rt y� s
� _� `it�. 1��2�
Owner(s)Address. ...
may: Strafe
Telephone#; Con#ac#pref ersr e
i
Ownership S#talus(Please cC:t,eck): 0 in
dividual O Trust M.Portnersbip sprCorporotion-
FropedyConsent:( )
8y signature h .tlwe ackno dge that otftcicts art/ar ern &t the
th r� €f futstrts
enter upon the property to hupeot or gc er other Inkmuattian e�ss
that,all meeting dates are tentative and may be p6stodited by E
or other adrrtinisttrtrative reasans.
Property Owner's S gnofure:
OT
! f4N
A
Proposed
0-
AL,it A-
:urrent Use of Properly:
and Surr€ur)d' Y -77
note 166f,
- 5
K
y
Page 4
SUBMIT TO:
City of Oshkosh Application Dept.of Community Development
215 Church Ave.,P.O.Box 1 130
Cito 1.CAf . Oshkosh,Wisconsin 54903-1130
Oshkosh Conditional Use Permit PHONE:(920)236-5059
**PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT USING BLACK INK"
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Petitioner: y *. r Date: Ib w
Petitioner's Address: tsy VZ �� City: ch } O CC_ State;�..D�_Zip:
Telephone#:940) W)-a- 63'`-s Email: Contact preference: Id Phone ❑Email
Status of Petitioner(Please Check): D Owner D Representative ATenant E Prospective Buyer
I
Petitioner's Signature (required): Date:
OWNER INFORMATION �^ [
Owner(s): c�>t 1 t� � e� "% LVAAA Date:--_ 1-19
Owner(s) Address:� O S �(� City:` State:Wr_Zip:-73
Telephone#: (Yam) )3)-- 9 Email: Contact preference: W Phone ❑Email
Ownership Status (Please Check): ❑Individual G Trust ❑Partnership Corporation
Property Owner Consent:(required)
By signature hereon, I/We acknowledge that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions,
enter upon the property to inspect or gather other information necessary to process this application. I also understand
that all meeting dates are tentative and may be postponed by the Planning Services Division for incomplete submissions
or other administrative reasons.
Property Owner's Signature: Date:
SITE INFORMATION
Address/Location of Proposed Project: ��
` t �
Proposed Project Type: ��la t' lvrflca
Current Use of Property: Am3\1 vet k-, C,I.-,C z co-t,SAC�11si tr. �r Ming:
Land Uses Surrounding Your Site: North: \1M C r.vtk-
South: t 1" �� � a �
East: l i� & L t �c
West: ar„ . Cnr
"Please note that a meeting notice will be mailed to all abutting property owners regarding your request.
➢ It is recommended that the applicant meet with Planning Services staff prior to submittal to discuss the proposal.
➢ Application fees are due at time of submittal. Make check payable to City of Oshkosh.
➢ Please refer to the fee schedule for appropriate fee. FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE
For more information please the City's website at www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/Community_Development/Planning.htm
Sign Staff Date Rec'd
Page 5
Briefly explain how the proposed conditional use will not have a negative effect on the issues below.
1. Health,safety,and general welfare of o�c�cjupants of Purr unding la is.
2. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation cod safety.
3. Noise,air,water,or other forms of envir nmental pollution. ,
i'
ivy a�\C�li:�MirA�f 'ARL'+.
4. The demand for and availability of public se ices and facilities.
V� Ic, 5sr u i , c�t9;
5. Character and future dev lopment of the aai((eat i
C,'A'-015 C t.�. Ls
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS-Must accompany the application to be complete.
(Submit only digital files. Please note at the discretion of Community Development staff may request a hard copy)
➢ A narrative of the proposed conditional use and project including:
❑ Proposed use of the property
❑ Existing use of the property
❑ Identification of structures on the property and discussion of their relation to the project
❑ Projected number of residents,employees,and/or daily customers
❑ Proposed amount of dwelling units,floor area,landscape area,and parking area expressed in square feet and
acreage to the nearest one-hundredth of an acre
❑ Effects on adjoining properties to include:noise,hours of operation,glare,odor,fumes,vibration,etc.
❑ Surrounding land uses
❑ Compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent and other properties in the area.
❑ Traffic generation
❑ Any other information pertinent to adequate understanding of the intended use and its relation to nearby properties
➢ A complete site plan including:
❑ Digital plans and drawings of the project
❑ Title block that provides all contact information for the petitioner and/or owner,if different
❑ Full name and contact information of petitioner's engineers/surveyors/architects,or other design professionals used in
the plan preparation
❑ The date of the original plan and latest date of revision to the plan
❑ A north arrow and graphic scale. Said scale is not to be smaller than one inch equals sixty feet(I"=60') unless
otherwise approved by the Department of Community Development prior to submittal
❑ All property lines and existing and proposed right-of-way lines with bearings and dimensions clearly labeled
❑ All required building setback and offset lines
❑ All existing and proposed buildings,structures,and paved areas,including building entrances,walks,drives,decks,
patios,fences,walls
❑ Location of all outdoor storage and refuse disposal areas and the design and materials used for construction
❑ Location and dimension of all on-site parking (and off-site parking provisions if they are to be employed),including a
summary of the number of parking stalls provided per the requirements of Section 30-175 City of Oshkosh Zoning
Ordinance
❑ Location and dimension of all loading and service areas on the subject property
❑ Location,height,design,illumination power and orientation of all exterior lighting on the property including a
photometrics plan
❑ Location of all exterior mechanical equipment and utilities and elevations of proposed screening devices where
applicable (i.e.visible from a public street or residential use or district). Mechanical equipment includes,but is not
limited to; HVAC equipment,electrical transformers and boxes,exhaust flues,plumbing vents,gas regulators,
generators
2
Page 6
i
it
''�.. �
G . +, .�11 _ _ _ _� - �,.__ ___, .
-- ....
............
1'S_9__ c3_S �
llila. la—
__ _ _._ _. __ _ _.
t' t �..��ti
-
t
....
i
y t '
r
........
Page
f,
i
n
a
sr+ + x
J; ..,
�? u
„w
i
I �
_ e
I
i
a
{ r
Ji
w
m.
cn
Page 9
i
CUP ALRO STEEL CORP EVERETT IND BLDG CO
36 E 10TH AVE PO BOX 927 PO BOX 1138
j PC: 11-19-19 JACKSON MI 49204 FOND DU LAC WI 54936
I
I
i
FOX VALLEY&WESTERN LTD G REINKE&CO INC GRANCY LLC
17641 S ASHLAND AVE 900 S MAIN ST 920 S MAIN ST
HOMEWOOD IL 60430 OSHKOSH WI 54902 OSHKOSH WI 54902
REDEVELOPMENT AUTH CITY OF OSHKOSH ROBERT SERWAS/CHRISTOPHER MATHIAS VINTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PO BOX 1130 4258 RUSHFORD AVE 2705 N RAPIDS RD
OSHKOSH WI 54903 OMRO WI 54963 MANITOWOC WI 54220
SADOFF IRON AND METAL COMPANY
36 E LOTH AVE
OSHKOSH WI 54902
Page 10
Tr4i,Au \.
4
0
e
> .\
Mi-A QTH-AV
t
-9T-H A E-9T-M-AV gt �
1131E m fOL '. - -
{ v I f
m a `C 4ff _
m
rn
ua u
ei
1--
Ll \' 1_
A DTia -Y— >DT-H-AV R_....o
xia ,.ate.
43 123
2 0
= o
' � v
s.ca
I
5'
-
W 1
ON
a 24 36 46 52 ae co
s.�
-4aT-M-A F-41T- AV
r sa tr'°- ►� � N 1 in=0.03mi
� .'lrr1 ,►� � 1 ,50ftAd
�Tn
In=
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and cit r
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the >f
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date:10/14/2019 �� p�
mv.w.ci.oshkosh.wi.uslGISdisclaimer Prepared by:City of Oshkosh,WI ( )
;GlS',PlanningiPlan Commission Site Plan Map Twniate,Plan Commission Site Plan Map Te:nplate.mW P agEYserIn11-g.
MU-PD-RFO-.........._� --1 CMU I' I UMU
-PD-RFO I
CMU-RFO CMU Y3 , t'i ' t- ,�i` ,
............. �r
�-- 'UM U M R-20
1
• • t r-RFO UMU-PD
CMU-PD-RFO �'
CMU
TR-10
Jl
j tr t
t
RMU-PD-RFO
t
t
RMU-PD ' UMU
l......_....:._ti MAMA
UMU-RFO
........_ UMU
_MR-36
-- -RMU-RFO
TR.10 _ CMU-PD
RMU-RMU-RFO j
....._ I ; CMU
l�
CMU- - HI
RMU-PD-RFO
IT
CMU-PD
VTR.10
AV
•,�
..l-....._ E D
I i M
R -RF0
c� V V 141 N
..............
_UMU
4
..........._ _
---- .........
% 1
r ' 1 in=500 ft
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and (I l
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the r€
Printing Date:10114/2019
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Oshkosh
mri.w.ci.oshkosh.wi.uslGISdisclaimer Prepared by:City of Oshkosh,WI
.':GISTIsnning;Plan Commission:Site Plar:.v!ap Tam;iate':?Ian Ctoinmission Site Plan Map Teenpiate.wd P ag(§se,InEA
WINy 7
Its
r
u
-^
va
Vall
wool
f ,
• 3 `R
flf Ia(iti Itit y tom'
Y s„ :.
G
------------
M
h
`' '•`�,'
-
as
2
O
�-
� --
M
1 in=0.02 mi
no
111 N
1 in=120 ftLOS-
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only.and
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the ref
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer please go to Printing Date:10/14/2019 � {[ �„
ww✓.ci.oshkosh.wi.usiGISdisclaimer Prepared by:City of Oshkosh,WI
:IG StP]anningRan Cormmisslon Site Plan Map Temp ate.?lan 1—ommission Site Plan Map Template.mxd P ag(EYse, yak