Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout45. 19-444 JULY 23, 2019 19-444 RESOLUTION (CARRIED LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN 7-0 ) PURPOSE: ESTABLISH 2O19 TRANSPORTATION UTILITY FEES INITIATED BY: CITY ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, the City of Oshkosh has established a Transportation Utility for the purposes of financing the reconstruction and maintenance of streets, sidewalks and associated transportation facilities within the City; and WHEREAS, Section 21-13 of the Oshkosh Municipal Code gives the Common Council authority to establish the Transportation Fee for the Utility; and WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that it is reasonable to charge property owners for their share of transportation facilities costs based on their estimated use of and impact to the transportation system; and WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that it is reasonable to establish a single fee for each dwelling unit for residential properties within the City of Oshkosh based upon the volume, size and type of vehicle traffic reasonably anticipated for typical residential parcels; and WHEREAS,the Common Council finds that for undeveloped, commercial, mixed- use, industrial and institutional parcels the amount of impervious surface reasonably correlates to the use of and impact to the transportation system considering the volume, size and type of vehicle traffic reasonably anticipated for these parcels and considering the standards of construction necessary for commercial vehicle traffic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh that the following fees shall be established: JULY 23, 2019 19-444 RESOLUTION CONT'D Residential Properties (properties used exclusively for residential purposes including single family homes, duplexes, residential condominiums, and multi-family units). The Transportation Utility Fee per month for Residential Parcels shall be: $4.50 x the number of dwelling units Non-Residential Properties (properties used for commercial, industrial, institutional or any other non-residential purposes including Mixed-Use & Undeveloped Properties). The charge for non-residential properties shall be based upon the amount of Developed Area on each parcel. The Developed Area Unit (DAU) shall be defined as the area of impervious surface and shall be calculated in the manner provided for calculation of the Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) as provided in Chapter 14 of the City of Oshkosh Municipal Code. The Transportation Utility Fee per month for Non-Residential Parcels shall be: $4.50 x the number of DAU present on the parcel (up to a maximum of 100 DAU) Unoccupied developed lots and parcels shall pay a Transportation Utility Fee based upon the zoning and prior use(s) of the property. Notwithstanding the provisions in Section 21-18 of the City of Oshkosh Municipal Code, owners of parcels wishing to file an appeal relating to the application of the Transportation Utility Fee to their parcel(s) shall do so within 30 days of this Resolution or 30 days of the Initial Sill for the Transportation Utility Fee for their parcel. Appeals shall follow the provisions set forth in Section 21-18 of the City of Oshkosh Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to take those steps necessary to implement the Transportation Utility Fee for Invoices issued on and after September 1, 2019. e ti „ City f Oshkosh TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council FROM: Mark Rohloff, City Manager James Rabe, Public Works Director DATE: May 31, 2019 RE: Analysis of Transportation Fee to Replace Special Assessments Attached is a summary of the analysis performed by staff in response to the recommendation by the Long Range Finance Committee and the request of the Common Council to replace street special assessments with a Transportation Fee. The results of the analysis are shown in the table and chart below. Staff is recommending a monthly fee of$4.50 per developed area unit(DAU)to achieve this goal. The components of the recommended fee are as follows: Category Average Annual$ $/DAU/month Concrete Paving $1,750,000 $2.42 Asphalt Paving $400,000 $0.55 Driveway Aprons $250,000 $0.35 New Sidewalk $50,000 $0.07 Sidewalk Rehab $800,000 $1.11 Total $3,250,000 $4.50 Rate Breakdown by Category 411111) $0.07 , •Concrete Paving • Asphalt Paving • Driveway Aprons •New Sidewalk •Sidewalk Rehab Also attached is a summary table comparing how various aspects of projects are currently paid for and how they would be paid for utilizing the Transportation Fee. The final two pages are comparisons of Special Assessment totals for typical lots in the Single Family Residential, Multi- Family Residential, and Non-Residential areas as well as a comparison of selected actual properties from the 2019 CIP as well as a comparison to certified Special Assessment totals from the 2017 CIP. As explained in the analysis, special assessments will continue for utility lateral replacements, as these improvements are directly related to a specific property. Special assessments will also continue in those cases where the city takes the lead on new street and or utility construction, primarily for new development. Staff believes that the proposed Transportation Fee meets Council's objectives of an equitable fee to replace the street and sidewalk special assessments,which will lessen the financial burden for residential,commercial, industrial, and institutional properties. The fee equitably distributes the financial burden of these public improvements across all of the above mentioned land uses. Finally, the fee will eliminate the need for the city to finance special assessments through additional city borrowing. Comparison of Alternatives to Special Assessments as Funding Source for Street Projects Special Vehicle Transportation Assessments Registration Fee Fee $65/vehicle/year $54/DAU/year Raises needed revenue of$3.25 million annually? Yes Yes Yes Out of town students contribute directly/indirectly? Yes No Yes Yes Tenants pay directly/indirectly Yes (if residents) Yes Residents pay directly/indirectly Yes Yes Yes Visitors/customers pay directly/indirectly Yes No Yes Payable by businesses in multiple jurisdictions? Yes No Yes Tax exempt properties pay? Yes No Yes Payable by governmental entities? Yes No Yes Cost less over extended period? No Yes Yes Reduces city borrowing? No Yes Yes Considers impact of large vehicles over 8,000 lbs.? Yes No Yes Easy to collect? No Yes Yes Affordable for residents and small businesses? No Yes Yes Cap for larger properties? No No _ Yes Spreads costs over an extended period? No Yes Yes Predictable amount? _ No Yes Yes Considers inflation of construction costs? Yes No Yes Accounts for multiple parcels? Yes Yes No Considers prior special assessments paid? Yes No No Yes Commonly used in WI? Yes (limited) No