HomeMy WebLinkAbout43. 19-442 JULY 23, 2019 19-442 RESOLUTION
(CARRIED 7-0 LOST LAID OVER WITHDRAWN )
PURPOSE: APPROVE TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 37 PROJECT PLAN;
DESIGNATE TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 37 BOUNDARIES;
CREATE TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 37 AVIATION PLAZA
REDEVELOPMENT
INITIATED BY: MINESHAFT OSHKOSH, LLC; EXTREME CUSTOMS, LLC;
PHOENIX REALTY, LLC; ROGAN'S SHOES, INC.
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approved
WHEREAS, the City of Oshkosh (the "City") has determined that use of Tax
Incremental Financing is required to promote development and redevelopment within
the City; and
WHEREAS, Tax Increment District No. 37 (the "District") is proposed to be
created by the City as a as district in need of rehabilitation or conservation in accordance
with the provisions of Wisconsin Statutes Section 66.1105 (the "Tax Increment Law"); and
WHEREAS, a Project Plan for the District has been prepared that includes:
a. A statement listing the kind,number and location of all proposed public works
or improvements within the District, or to the extent provided in Wisconsin
Statutes Sections 66.1105(2)(k) and 66.1105(4)(gm), outside of the District;
b. An economic feasibility study;
c. A detailed list of estimated project costs;
d. A description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the
time when the related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred;
e. A map showing existing uses and conditions of real property in the District;
f. A map showing proposed improvements and uses in the District;
g. Proposed changes of zoning ordinances, master plan, map,building codes and
City ordinances;
h. A list of estimated non-project costs;
i. A statement of the proposed plan for relocation of any persons to be displaced;
j. A statement indicating how the District promotes the orderly development of
the City;
JULY 23, 2019 19-442 RESOLUTION
CONTD
k. An opinion of the City Attorney or of an attorney retained by the City advising
that the plan is complete and complies with Wisconsin Statutes Section
66.1105(4)(f); and
WHEREAS, prior to its publication, a copy of the notice of public hearing was
sent to owners of all property in the proposed district, to the chief executive officers of
Winnebago County, the Oshkosh Area School District, and the Fox Valley Technical
College District, and any other entities having the power to levy taxes on property located
within the District, in accordance with the procedures specified in the Tax Increment
Law; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedures specified in the Tax Increment
Law, the Plan Commission, on July 2, 2019 held a public hearing concerning the project
plan and boundaries and proposed creation of the District, providing interested parties a
reasonable opportunity to express their views thereon; and
WHEREAS, after said public hearing, the Plan Commission designated the
boundaries of the District, adopted the Project Plan, and recommended to the Common
Council that it create such District and approve the Project Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Oshkosh that:
1. The boundaries of the District shall be named "City of Oshkosh Tax
Increment District No. 37, Aviation Plaza Redevelopment", are hereby
established as specified in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
2. The District is created effective as of January 1, 2019.
3. The Common Council finds and declares that:
(a) Not less than 50% by area of the real property within the District is in
need of rehabilitation or conservation work within the of Wisconsin
Statutes Section 66.1337(2m)(a).
(b) Based upon the finding, as stated in 3(a) above, the District is declared
to be a District in need of rehabilitation or conservation based on the
identification and classification of the property included within the
District.
JULY 23, 2019 19-442 RESOLUTION
CONTD
(c) The improvement of such area is likely to significantly enhance the
value of substantially all of the other real property in the District.
(d) The equalized value of the taxable property in the District plus the
incremental value of all other existing tax incremental districts within
the City, does not exceed 12% of the total equalized value of taxable
property within the City.
(e) The City estimates that 75% of the territory within the District will be
devoted to retail business at the end of the District's maximum
expenditure period, pursuant to Wisconsin Statutes Section
66.1105(5)(b).
(f) The project costs relate directly to promoting rehabilitation or
conservation of the area consistent with the purpose for which the
District is created.
(g) All property within TID #37 was within the City boundaries as of
January 1, 2004.
4. The attached Project Plan for "City of Oshkosh Tax Increment District No.
37, Aviation Plaza Redevelopment" is hereby approved, and the City
further finds the Plan is feasible and in conformity with the master plan of
the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Oshkosh
hereby approves creation of Tax Incremental Financing District No. 37 Aviation Plaza
Redevelopment.
"Exhibit A"
TID 37 Aviation Plaza Redevelopment
Legal Description
ALL OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 4 AND PART OF LOT 3 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP
NUMBER 5964 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1410416, WINNEBAGO
COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS, AND ALL OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP NUMBER
3521 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 947777, WINNEBAGO COUNTY
REGISTER OF DEEDS, LOCATED IN THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, CITY OF OSHKOSH,
WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WISCONSIN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 18
NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST; THENCE S83°25'12"E, 360.32 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF CSM NUMBER 5964 AND POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
S88039'47"E, 594.16 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CSM TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID CSM; THENCE S00045'42"W, 74.78 FEET ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF SAID CSM; THENCE S04044'31"E, 120.84 FEET ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID CSM; THENCE S00045'29"W, 819.98 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID CSM TO THE BEGINNING OF A 300.10-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHEAST; THENCE 160.80 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE, THE CHORD OF
WHICH BEARS S14035'50.5"E, 158.88 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE
S36004'57"E, 23.17 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID CSM TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID CSM; THENCE S02017'55"W, 129.23 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID CSM; THENCE S53016'41"W, 386.97 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY
LOT LINE OF SAID CSM; THENCE S59057'12"W, 302.59 FEET ALONG THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID CSM NUMBER 5964 AND CSM NUMBER 3521 TO
THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID CSM 3521; THENCE N35043'30"W, 280.40 FEET
ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF SAID CSM NUMBERS 3521 AND 5964; THENCE
N12019'25"W, 253.44 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID CSM NUMBER 5964;
THENCE N04014'54"W, 469.67 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID CSM
NUMBER 5964; THENCE N00047'22"E, 40.34 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
CSM NUMBER 5964 TO THE BEGINNING OF RIGHT-OF-WAY COURSE PER
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PLAT NUMBER 1120-
10-21 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1493434, WINNEBAGO COUNTY
REGISTER OF DEEDS,BEING POINT PRW284 ON SAID PLAT; THENCE N11045'09"E,
117.14 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO POINT PRW285; THENCE
N10010'25"W, 117.14 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO POINT PRW286 ALSO
BEING A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID CSM NUMBER 5964; THENCE
N00047'22"E, 156.47 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE; THENCE N27026'46"E, 386.58'
ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID AREA CONTAINS 1,157,703 SQUARE FEET OR 26.577 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
of Tax Incremierl Distdict #37 n4
Aviation Plaza Redeve llopme nit (2 IF w
i3 Plarcel Identification hkosh
eHasps pmool FotofA
Map 0WOOF LoCal Addiem 6orwd volum, llffirjfov� 904d Value, Equinhaod Clcm Doloillho c 10#14119
vdwo t Llb—� U I
.. ........................................ .................................................
i D Et SOAU FD
I Fl7v—��Ali] $7,21110X) ll�
:I�;14 —7����
,2 Plo F), 3 :SmKA41()I''23-1104"w"Alo 5 ONOXW) 1, 6' M) $1"W"625, 0
------------------- 'A —0 11 F,(�
IV,4 I 17"1�l I'll�3311 77—RiJ w 3 77 s�i 6741wo s 17x,7757
7F F ---------- ------ ,--t—--1 "T
'!�500)
P11 101 hil X K,r M TY�1(7, 44d ji, 4 UPR V 5
I C S 1"Cifilll FR M b2tYK) 61�2, M K f)
Z)T;Tl-w.[73,414,'.XXI C6,n 1,mfo $6AV?4)
...............
-4
...............................
20TWuur luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuu�l�l uul uul uullVul _...w
A,
............ .............
g
z
m ....................
MEN
...............
Eg"
00,
it
21,
uuuuuu
VI uwuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugllllllll
00 AV
j��
Yl
IIII�I�II%iiri/!rv//%/�/" ...,l 7A� i%'i� I��rl "il�"'°�ly �V�, „�'✓'� „
3,
/ � �
V3-23 f0040
.............
3-'123?0-040.2
Legend
TO #37 5,cwndoury
.r t.......... ................... ............. j
I ID Iwll 3.7 �livuhqaii C i y � Ca's ca,s
Pliiei.Dwe,�;l by Ip 1hrk:Irs V ai ge 9 Jifly ", 1,019
Apr
Oshkosh
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Common Council
FROM: Mark Lyons
Planning Services Manager
DATE: July 18, 2019
RE: Approve Tax Increment District No. 37 Project Plan; Designate Tax Increment
District No. 37 Boundaries; Create Tax Increment District No. 37 Aviation Plaza
(Plan Commission Recommends Approval)
BACKGROUND
Tax Incremental District No. 37 (the "TID" or "District") is a proposed 27 acre area in need of
rehabilitation or conservation located in the vicinity of the W. South Park Ave. and S. Koeller
Street and abutting Interstate 41. The proposed district is comprised of five parcels owned by
the applicants and contain approximately 117,000 sq. ft. of retail space with Rogan's Shoes as
the only current occupant following the closure of the J.C. Penny Store in 2015. The former
Walmart store was demolished in 2007.
The City anticipates making total expenditures of approximately $4.84 million to undertake
projects identified in the Project Plan. Project costs include an estimated $1.89 million in "pay
as you go" development incentives (principal and interest), $2.75 million for additional public
infrastructure improvements and an estimated $200,000 in administrative costs.
The Project Plan includes a statement listing the kind, number and location of proposed
improvements which starts on page 14. It contains an economic feasibility study, a detailed list
of estimated project costs and timing of those costs as well as a method of financing starting on
page 18.
ANALYSIS
The City is projecting that new land and improvements value of approximately $12.4 million
will result from redevelopment activity within the District. These key assumptions are
identified in Section 10 of the Plan starting on page 20. The"expected" improvements will occur
on the five parcels located in the district and will entail the following:
Use
The developers are proposing a mixture of commercial and office uses. The developments are
further described below as Extreme Customs, Mineshaft and Rogan's Shoes.
Table 1 on page 21 shows the development assumptions when values will be added to each of
the sites. The developers are anticipating being able to fully develop the district by sometime in
2020.
Extreme Customs
The petitioner is proposing to redevelop the existing 62,435 sq. ft. commercial structure to
accommodate a new location for Extreme Customs. Extreme Customs is presently located at
3420 Jackson Street and has outgrown that location. Extreme Customs is an automotive
customization company specializing in aftermarket tires and wheels. They also offer accessories
for all types of trucks and cars. The business is a mixture of online sales and walk-in business.
The owner believes relocating to this area will aid in increasing his walk-in business via
increased visibility, while providing the additional space needed for the growing online side of
the business. The applicant plans to renovate the existing building to include a retail showroom,
office space, vehicle service space and warehouse space. In conjunction with the interior
renovation the applicant will also be upgrading the building exterior to include a new front
façade, customer entrance and updating the overall façade. The applicant will also be making
improvements to their water, sewer and storm water infrastructure to bring the site into
compliance with current code requirements.
Mineshaft
The applicant is proposing to construct a 34,423 sq. ft. building, which would include a
restaurant, tavern and entertainment area. The applicant identifies an additional 30,000 sq. ft.
for potential expansion. Standard hours of operation would be 6 am to 2 am daily with certain
aspects of the business having shorter hours of operation. The applicant anticipates
approximately 50 full-time and 50 part-time employees. The site also includes a 19,449 sq. ft.
vacant retail space. The applicant is not proposing any changes to that space. The applicant
will also be making improvements to their parking lot, landscaping, water, sewer and storm
water infrastructure to bring the site into compliance with current code requirements.
Rogan s Shoes
The applicant will be making improvements to their water, sewer and storm water
infrastructure to bring the site into compliance with current code requirements.
Based on the Municipal Revenue Obligation (MRO) for the development incentive identified on
Table 3 on Page 24 of the Plan, the district is anticipated to pay off costs by 2036 at which time
the city could potentially terminate, which would be 16 years. If necessary, the district would
be permitted to remain open for up to the statutorily allowed 27 years. At that point the full
value of the properties would be added back to the overall tax rolls which current estimate is
$15.5 million in improvement value alone. This payoff date could change based on potential
City Hall •215 Church Avenue • P.O.Box 1130 •Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130
http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
changes in assessed value of the site. Additionally, should additional project expenditures be
undertaken this may adjust the anticipated termination date of the district.
Type of District
The District is being created as an area "in need of rehabilitation or conservation" within the
meaning of Wis. Stat. 66.1337 (2m)(a) based on a finding that over 50% of the area is need of
rehabilitation. The parcels identified as "in need of rehabilitation or conservation" are shown
on the Existing Conditions map on page 11 of the plan. The subject properties contained aged
infrastructure which do not conform to current code requirements and are in need of
rehabilitation to be bought into compliance before any redevelopment can take place.
The proposed Plan is in general conformance with the City of Oshkosh's Comprehensive Plan
identifying the area as appropriate for Interstate Commercial development. Interstate
Commercial land use's intent is to allow "intense commercial and retail uses generally located
along primary highway corridors and intersections". The development is also consistent with
the City Center Corridor Plan for South Park Avenue, which identifies the area as Site B1 and
recommends the site as a location the city should focus redevelopment efforts to improve the
character of the gateway and act as a catalyst for further development.
FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant is requesting approximately $1.89 million in "pay-as-you-go" development
incentive to make the project economically viable. The payments would only be made under
the terms of a development agreement and when developed per that agreement and property
taxes are paid.
RECOMMENDATION
The Plan Commission recommended approval of Tax Increment District No.37 Project Plan and
the designation of the boundaries at its July 2, 2019 meeting.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved:
Mark Lyons Mark A. Rohloff
Planning Services Manager City Manager
City Hall • 215 Church Avenue • P.O.Box 1130 •Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130
http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
Ni...11.11.1111111111111111111L
'\‘ r\l' ,./ ,
, \r 4( ( A
7 r-- alp_
i ■ )
li, ilk<
.r----- 1 . 1ff F.---- —1 I I \ ---- 2 de
a
w-201.H-AV _,
SUBJECT ` Flip. i
SITE �s.*e '!.*4♦ , '�
\dk .
. LI Ill \
LU
•♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ s Ca
'• Q N
10� f E :r_ . 5i- �L\N!ND AV
_ 1A
00 0;..,-
alp ♦♦♦♦ tI
,-,IL...)i.--:,:411
/ ,s t,
44 tt
Lin:Ysr• \ 2\
"rir 1`.19, 7 r]\/.1r J� iDi`i r1,,r1 N 1in=0.07mi
1 in=350ft #011111
City of Oshkosh maps and data are intended to be used for general identification purposes only,and City
the City of Oshkosh assumes no liability for the accuracy of the information. Those using the of
iir
information are responsible for verifying accuracy. For full disclaimer Printing Date:6117l2019 Oshkost_
p fyi gplease go to J r 1
www.a.oshkosh.wi.usiGlSdisdaimer Prepared by:City of Oshkosh,WI
J:\GIS'FlanningiPlan Commission Site Plan Map Template'!Plan Commission Site Plan Map Template.mxd P a "mjcwk
ITEM: PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED CREATION OF TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO.37 AVIATION PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT;DESIGNATION OF BOUNDARIES AND APPROVAL OF
PROJECT PLAN
Plan Commission meeting of July 2, 2019.
Prior to taking action on proposed Tax Increment District(TID) No. 37 and the designation of
boundaries for said TID, the Plan Commission is to hold a public hearing and take comments
concerning proposed creation of TID No. 37. The public hearing is required as part of the
formal review process the City must follow in the creation of any tax incremental financing
district or amendment thereto.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicants/Owners: Mineshaft Oshkosh LLC
Extreme Customs LLC (Currently owned by Phoenix Realty LLC)
Rogan's Shoes Inc.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND
Please see attached TID No. 37 Project Plan for more detailed information.
Tax Incremental District No. 37 (the "TID" or "District") is a proposed 27 acre in need of
rehabilitation or conservation district located in the vicinity of the W. South Park Ave. and S.
Koeller Street and abutting Interstate 41. The proposed district is comprised of five parcels
owned by the applicants and contain approximately 117,000 sq.ft. of retail space with Rogan's
Shoes as the only current occupant following the closure of the J.C. Penny Store in 2015. The
former Walmart store was demolished in 2007.
The City anticipates making total expenditures of approximately$4.84 million to undertake
project identified in the Project Plan. Project costs include an estimated$1.89 million in"pay as
you go" development incentives (principal and interest), $2.75 million for additional public
infrastructure improvements and an estimated$200,000 in administrative costs.
The Project Plan includes a statement listing the kind,number and location of proposed
improvements which starts on page 14. It contains an economic feasibility study, a detailed list
of estimated project costs and timing of those costs as well as a method of financing starting on
page 18.
ANALYSIS
The City is projecting that new land and improvements value of approximately$12.4 million
will result from redevelopment activity within the District. These key assumptions are
identified in Section 10 of the Plan starting on page 20. The "expected" improvements will
occur on the five parcels located in the district and will entail the following:
Use
The developers are proposing a mixture of commercial and office uses. The developments are
further described below as Extreme Customs, Mineshaft and Rogan's Shoes.
Table 1 on page 21 shows the development assumptions when values will be added to each of
the sites. The developers are anticipating being able to fully develop the district by sometime
in 2020.
Extreme Customs
The petitioner is proposing to redevelop the existing 62,435 sq. ft. commercial structure to
accommodate a new location for Extreme Customs. Extreme Customs is presently located at 3420
Jackson Street and has outgrown that location. Extreme Customs is an automotive customization
company specializing in aftermarket tires and wheels. They also offer accessories for all types of
trucks and cars. The business is a mixture of online sales and walk-in business. The owner
believes relocating to this area will aid in increasing his walk-in business via increased visibility,
while providing the additional space needed for the growing online side of the business. The
applicant plans to renovate the existing building to include a retail showroom, office space,
vehicle service space and warehouse space. In conjunction with the interior renovation the
applicant will also be upgrading the building exterior to include a new front fagade, customer
entrance and updating the overall fagade. The applicant will also be making improvements to
their water, sewer and storm water infrastructure to bring the site into compliance with current
code requirements.
Mineshaft
The applicant is proposing to construct a 34,423 sq. ft.building, which would include a
restaurant, tavern and entertainment area. The applicant identifies an additional 30,000 sq. ft.
for potential expansion. Standard hours of operation would be 6 am to 2 am daily with certain
aspects of the business having shorter hours of operation. The applicant anticipates
approximately 50 full-time and 50 part-time employees. The site also includes a 19,449 sq. ft.
vacant retail space. The applicant is not proposing any changes to that space. The applicant
will also be making improvements to their parking lot, landscaping, water, sewer and storm
water infrastructure to bring the site into compliance with current code requirements.
Rogan s Shoes
The applicant will be making improvements to their water, sewer and storm water
infrastructure to bring the site into compliance with current code requirements.
District Life
Based on the Municipal Revenue Obligation(MRO) for the development incentive identified
on Table 3 on Page 24 of the Plan, the district is anticipated to pay off costs by 2036 at which
time the city could potentially terminate, which would be 16 years. If necessary, the district
would be permitted to remain open for up to the statutorily allowed 27 years. At that point the
full value of the properties would be added back to the overall tax rolls which current estimate
is$15.5 million in improvement value alone. This payoff date could change based on potential
Item:Creation of TID W Aviation Plaza Redevelopment Project
changes in assessed value of the site. Additionally, should additional project expenditures be
undertaken this may adjust the anticipated termination date of the district.
Type of District
The District is being created as an area "in need of rehabilitation or conservation" within the
meaning of Wis. Stat. 66.1337(2m)(a)based on a finding that over 50% of the area is need of
rehabilitation. The parcels identified as "in need of rehabilitation or conservation" are shown
on the Existing Conditions map on page 11 of the plan. The subject properties contained aged
infrastructure which do not conform to current code requirements and are in need of
rehabilitation to be bought into compliance before any redevelopment can take place.
Consistency with Plans
The proposed Plan is in general conformance with the City of Oshkosh's Comprehensive Plan
identifying the area as appropriate for Interstate Commercial development. Interstate
Commercial land use's intent is to allow "intense commercial and retail uses generally located
along primary highway corridors and intersections". The development is also consistent with
the City Center Corridor Plan for South Park Avenue, which identifies the area as Site B1 and
recommends the site as a location the city should focus redevelopment efforts to improve the
character of the gateway and act as a catalyst for further development.
RECOMMENDATIONS/CONDITIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Project Plan and Boundaries for TID #37 as proposed.
The Plan Commission approved of the Project Plan and Boundaries for TID #37 as requested.
The following is the Plan Commission's discussion on this item.
Site Inspections Report: Mr. Fojtik and Mr.Hinz reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
Tax Incremental District No. 37(the "TID" or"District")is a proposed 27 acre in need of
rehabilitation or conservation district located in the vicinity of the W. South Park Ave. and S.
Koeller Street and abutting Interstate 41. The proposed district is comprised of five parcels
owned by the applicants and contain approximately 117,000 sq. ft. of retail space with Rogan's
Shoes as the only current occupant following the closure of the J.C. Penny Store in 2015. The
former Walmart store was demolished in 2007.
Mr. Lyons presented the item and discussed the purpose of the proposed TID creation. The
City anticipates making total expenditures of approximately$4.84 million to undertake project
identified in the Project Plan. Project costs include an estimated$1.89 million in "pay as you
go" development incentives (principal and interest), $2.75 million for additional public
infrastructure improvements and an estimated$200,000 in administrative costs. The City is
projecting that new land and improvements value of approximately$12.4 million will result
from redevelopment activity within the District. The "expected"improvements will occur on
the five parcels located in the district. The developers are proposing a mixture of commercial
Item:Creation of TID#37 Aviation Plaza Redevelopment Project
and office uses. The developments are Extreme Customs, Mineshaft and Rogan's Shoes. The
developers are anticipating being able to fully develop the district by sometime in 2020. The
proposed Plan is in general conformance with the City of Oshkosh's Comprehensive and the
City Center Corridor Plan for South Park Avenue.
Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff.
Mr. Hinz asked if the TIF would include any potential developments on the east side of the
property.
Mr. Lyons explained the TID does account for full reconstruction of the entire area. He said the
storm water and utilities are being accounted for if outlot development should take place. He
said the storm water management plan is already being sized to be able to accommodate that.
He stated they are trying to be forward thinking in this TID.
Mr. Fojtik asked Mr. Lyons to talk about the aviation component of the project and how it limits
developments.
Mr. Lyons showed the area of the Airport Zoning Overlay which covers most of the proposed
area. He explained the overlay does not permit anything that is deemed an assembly use (hotel,
restaurant,etc.).
Mr. Fojtik commented any place a plane may crash.
Mr. Lyons replied correct.
Mr. Mitchell said it states that part of the basis for the request is that city does not have funds
available to pay for the cost to rehabilitate the public infrastructure. He asked if the city did not
maintain or have a revenue source for updating its' own public infrastructure.
Mr. Lyons explained the public infrastructure is on the private side. He said the Public Service
Commission(PSC) requires an independent waterline to each building.
Ms. Nieforth clarified the city's water main is in the right-of-way. She reiterated that PSC
requires a private parcel owner to have a lateral off of the city's water main to their site. She
explained that is where the city does not have funds, to connect off the water main into the site.
Mr. Mitchell said it states public infrastructure but it is really privately owned.
Todd Taves (Senior Municipal Advisor, Ehlers), said the site has been sitting idle for an
extended period of time. He explained the things that have to be done to allow for this site to
develop is costly and reconstructing always costs more. He stated it has been determined that
to make the project economically viable for the property owners/developers,using the TIF
money to address the site conditions that are in impairment is necessary for the site to move
forward. He stated it is a combination of the utility cost but also private and public costs in
order to make the site attractive.
Item:Creation of TID#37 Aviation Plaza Redevelopment Project
Mr. Ford asked for confirmation that the Mineshaft would cost$16 million but could only get$8
million from the bank. He asked if the Mineshaft would have to put up the rest of the money
themselves without the TIF district.
Ms. Nieforth said the city made an effort, applied for a WDC grant and was granted$500,000.
She said they are trying to lower the TIF assistance amount. She explained the applicants are
asking for TIF assistance for under ten years which is a goal that Council does have in the TIF
policy. She stated the applicants are trying to meet all the goals that Council has set forth.
Mr. Ford asked if there is any type of sensitivity analysis. He said just looking at the revenues,
they have a 10 million dollar stream with a range of$7 to$13 million. He said he is just curious
if there is anything the city looks at with what the impact would be if it were on the lower end
of the range.
Mr. Taves replied one of the techniques that the city has used is the concept of pay as you go.
He explained rather than the city fronting the money, the developers provide the money and
would be reimbursed. He said the impact if there was less value is that the developer would be
reimbursed for a longer time which would increase the life of the district. He said it would not
cost the city to be out any funds. He said the other thing it would do is to the extent that there
are additional infrastructure needs down the road,which is being shown as being cash funded
out of the TID after the reimbursements are made to the developer, it would either reduce or
delay the ability of the city to access those monies for those types of projects.
Mr. Ford said the main risk to him from a land use decision is that this is for a 35,000 sq. ft.
building they are funding via this TIF. He questioned what would happen if the business was
not successful.
Ms. Nieforth replied if the building went out of business in two years, the city would still have
an updated public infrastructure installed already,laterals installed to each site that would meet
code and a storm water facility that would help with the Stringham Creek watershed area. She
said there would still be some value to the site though it would not be at its fullest potential but
the city could still capture increment to fulfil TIF obligations.
Mr.Mitchell said it is his first time going through one of these. He said during his research,he
found that TIFs can create a shadow fund. He asked what kind of oversight does the city have
and who determines the distribution.
Mr. Taves replied when the city creates a Tax Increment District, it has to create a special fund
typically a special revenue fund. He explained more about the special revenue fund. He said
the city's financial statements are audited annually to include those in the Tax Increment
Districts. He stated there is also a Joint Review Board involved in this process consisting of
members from each taxing jurisdictions. He said one of the requirements for the TIF statue is
that a report must be filed annually with the Department of Revenue that accounts for all the
revenues and expenditures. The Joint Review Board also meets annually to review the reports
for each of the outstanding Tax Increment Districts of the city.
Item:Creation of TID 937 Aviation Pla a Redevelopment Project
Mr. Mitchell asked who outlines what the funds are used for.
Mr. Taves explained the plan is intended to be the framework for making expenditures but the
fact that it is in a Tax Increment District does not change what the Council would otherwise be
required to approve. He said all the expenditures go through the same process as any other city
expenditure.
Mr. Fojtik opened up the public hearing.
f ason White, 1204 Fairfax Street, said he is with GOEDC and sent a letter this afternoon. He
stated the letter confirms support of the TID. He explained how he got directly involved when
he met Tyler from Extreme Customs in 2018 and helped identify a new location for Extreme
Customs. He explained the process of planning and getting the approval through the city for
the site. He believes the TIF needs to go hand in hand with the developments. He said the costs
Tyler would incur to stay at the site with aging infrastructure is not possible for them to finance
without the TIF. He stated they do believe this does enhance the corridor and improves the city
as a whole. He reiterated this cannot happen without the Tax Increment District.
Tom Masters, 22 N. Main Street in Hartford, said he is the owner of the Mineshaft in Hartford
and also owns The Fox and Hound in the Holy Hill area. He wanted to address the viability of
the restaurant. He said he has been at the Mineshaft for 44 years. He stated they have never
had a bad year or a slow year. He explained it is not a bar or club and the entertainment area is
a gaming area. He stated he has been at the other restaurant for 17 years and both his
restaurants are doing really good.
Tim Hess, 2645 Templeton Place,said he was involved in some of the analytics portions. He
said the range of$7 to$13 million does mean there is substantial risks. He said they are trying
to make it so the developers do not have to bring in a huge amount of money which is hard to
do when it is this sort of facility. He pointed out the owners of the properties and a contractor
are present to answer any questions.
Mr. Fojtik closed the public hearing.
Motion by Kiefer to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Seconded by Perry.
Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion.
Mr. Mitchell stated it lists there are 4.6 million dollars for public infrastructure overall. He
asked what percent of public infrastructure is being paid for by the city.
Mr. Lyons replied the public infrastructure cost is$2.75 million which is public infrastructure
cost after development incentives have been paid to the developer.
Item:Creation of TID#37 Aviation Plaza Redevelopment Project
Mr. Mitchell explained where he was adding his numbers from. He said he is trying to
understand the total infrastructure cost and how much the city is paying for.
Ms. Nieforth said it almost has to be broken up into two. She explained there are items the
developers have to do to get the development ready which will be in the cash flow sheet. She
said those costs will be taken care of at the beginning and then there are other cost the city has
identified such as certain public infrastructure cost that benefit the district. She explained the
TIF money can't be used for other projects that would not benefit the district directly. She
reiterated the$2.75 million is the cost after the TIF assistance obligation is complete. She said
they made sure there are adequate funds for the Stringham Creek watershed issues and
connecting the district to other areas on the west side of 41.
Mr.Mitchell said his understanding is that financial support is very important in providing for
these public infrastructures just like in residential areas. He asked if the city is paying for all the
public infrastructure or if they are sharing the cost with the property owners.
Ms. Nieforth replied there are some costs that are identified on the site that are required to get
the site in compliance that the city did not include in the TIF plan. She said the owners will be
required to pay those costs. She reiterated this is a pay as you go and the developers would pay
for the cost up front. She stated there are costs that would be paid by the property owners that
would not be TIF funded.
Mr. Mitchell asked for a rough estimate of percentage the city is paying for regarding the public
infrastructure.
Ms. Nieforth said without looking at the numbers that they did not include in the TIF plan, she
would not feel comfortable giving a percentage. She stated there is a substantial amount that
was not included.
Mr. Lyons commented the developers are trying to stay under ten year which is a benchmark
set by Council. He explained when Council looks at TIFs, they really like things that cash flow
under ten years. He said the applicant,in looking at the numbers, only asked enough to stay
under that ten year window.
Ms. Nieforth asked Mr.Hess what the total TIF request was to the total investment.
Mr. Hess replied$1.7 million is 7.4% of the overall investment.
Mr. Ford said he wants to ensure that Plan Commission is doing its due diligence and thanked
staff for answering his questions.
Ms. Nieforth said it is something the city does when it is working the Ehlers. She said there is a
market analysis that the city requires as part of the submittal to ensure the city can meet the TIF
obligations should something happen.
Item:Creation of TID#37 Aviation Pla.a Redevelopment Project
Mr. Hinz said typically Oshkosh has not been friendly to restaurants that wants TIFs. He said
there have been two that have come through with multi-use developments. He stated the
Mineshaft is going to dominate this property as far as what people think of when they think
about the property. He said the overlay is going prevent another restaurant coming into the
space. He stated this is exactly why we have TIFs because this is a gateway to the city. He said
this area has been up for discussion for the last ten years. He commended everyone for
working on this.
Mr. Fojtik said this gives a chance to correct some mistakes from the original development in
terms of building layout. He said given the long time the area has sat and the aviation overlay
restrictions,he feels this is an appropriate step.
Motion carried 9-0.
Item:Creation of TID#37 Aviation Pla-za Redevelopment Project
TIF NO.37 AVIATION ALDI INC CORP AVIATION RESTAURANT
PC:07-02-19 PO BOX 460049 DEPT 501 2100 S KOELLER ST
HOUSTON TX 77056 OSHKOSH WI 54902
GARVENS PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC JAMES F/MARCIE E MCDEVITT REV TRUST MASTERS OSHKOSH LLC
5363 LEONARD POINT RD 333513TH ST 22 N MAIN ST
OMRO WI 54963 KENOSHA WI 53144 HARTFORD WI 53027
MP DEVELOPMENT 6 LLC PHOENIX REALTY LLC REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 6 LLC
601 OREGON ST B 401 E KILBOURN AVE STE 201 11995 EL CAMINO REAL STE 101
OSHKOSH WI 54902 MILWAUKEE WI 53202 SAN DIEGO CA 92130
ROGAN STORES OSHKOSH LLC 1935 KOELLER LLC EXTREME CUSTOMS
1750 OHIO ST 691 S GREEN BAY RD 208 3420 JACKSON ST.SUITE A
RACINE WI 53405 NEENAH WI 54956 OSHKOSH,WI 54901
Page 5
g'%' EHLERS
0 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
July 2, 2019
Project Plan for the Creation of
Tax Incremental District No. 37
(Aviation Plaza Redevelopment)
.n
4VV
Oshkosh
Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 28, 2019
Public Hearing: July 2,2019
Approval by Plan Commission: July 2, 2019
Adoption by Common Council: Scheduled for July 23, 2019
Approval by the Joint Review Board: Scheduled for July 24, 2019
BUILDING COMMUNITIES, IT'S WHAT WE DO. IrrfaQ*hIam-IncAom 1(000)5521171 is www.ohlers-Ina.com
Tax Incremental District No. 37 Creation
Project Plan
City of Oshkosh Officials
Common Council
Lori Palmeri Mayor
Steve Herman Deputy Mayor
Debra L.Allison-Aasby Council Member
Jake Krause Council Member
William Miller Council Member
Matt Mugerauer Council Member
Bob Poeschl Council Member
City Staff
Mark Rohloff City Manager
Allen Davis Community Development Director
Lynn Lorenson City Attorney
Mark Lyons Acting Planning Manager
Kelly Nieforth Economic Development Services Manager
Trena Larson Finance Director
Pamela Ubrig City Clerk
Plan Commission
Thomas Fojtik,Chair John Kiefer
Kathleen Propp,Vice-Chair Justin Mitchell
Lynnsey Erickson Lori Palmeri,Mayor
Mike Ford Thomas Perry
Derek Groth
John Hinz
Joint Review Board
Mark Rohloff, City Manager City Representative
Mark Harris, County Executive Winnebago County
Amy Van Straten,Chief Financial Officer Fox Valley Technical College District
Barbara Herzog, School Board President Oshkosh School District
Burk Tower Public Member
E--m^W - 1-800-552-1171 1 www.ehlers-inc,com
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVESUMMARY...........................................................................................................................................4
TYPE AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT........................................................................................7
PRELIMINARY MAPS OF PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY......................................................................8
MAPS SHOWING EXISTING USES AND CONDITIONS.................................................................................10
PRELIMINARY PARCEL LIST AND ANALYSIS.................................................................................................12
EQUALIZEDVALUE TEST.....................................................................................................................................13
STATEMENT OF KIND, NUMBER AND LOCATION OF PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS AND OTHER
PROJECTS................................................................................................................................................................14
MAP SHOWING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND USES.........................................................................16
DETAILED LIST OF PROJECT COSTS ..............................................................................................................18
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY, FINANCING METHODS, AND THE TIME WHEN COSTS OR
MONETARY OBLIGATIONS RELATED ARE TO BE INCURRED..................................................................20
ANNEXEDPROPERTY...........................................................................................................................................25
ESTIMATE OF PROPERTY TO BE DEVOTED TO RETAIL BUSINESS......................................................25
PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGES................................................................................................25
PROPOSED CHANGES IN MASTER PLAN, MAP, BUILDING CODES AND CITY OF OSHKOSH
ORDINANCES..........................................................................................................................................................25
RELOCATION...........................................................................................................................................................25
ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF OSHKOSH.............................................................................26
LIST OF ESTIMATED NON-PROJECT COSTS.................................................................................................26
OPINION OF ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF OSHKOSH ADVISING WHETHER THE PLAN IS
COMPLETE AND COMPLIES WITH WISCONSIN STATUTES 66.1105......................................................27
CALCULATION OF THE SHARE OF PROJECTED TAX INCREMENTS ESTIMATED TO BE PAID BY
THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN THE OVERLYING TAXING JURISDICTIONS......................................28
APPENDIX A-DEVELOPER'S TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCING APPLICATION.................................................29
APPENDIX B- MARKET STUDY AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS REPORT.............................................43
PLAN COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING/MINUTES OF JULY 2, 2019....................................................
COMMON COUNCIL CREATION RESOLUTION OF JULY 23, 2019.....................................................
JOINT REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION JULY 24, 2019............................................................................
SECTION 1 :
Executive Summary
Description of District
Tax Incremental District ("TID") No. 37 ("District") is a proposed district in need of rehabilitation or
conservation consisting of five parcels and approximately 27 acres collectively referred to as the Aviation
Plaza center located northwest of the intersection of W. South Park Ave. and S. Koeller Street and
abutting Interstate 41. The existing commercial building in the District contains approximately 117,000
sq. ft. of retail space with Rogan's Shoes as the only current occupant following the closure of the J.C.
Penny store in 2015. Mineshaft Oshkosh LLC, Extreme Customs LLC, and Rogan's Shoes Inc.
(collectively, "Developer") have submitted a plan to redevelop the properties located within the District.
The Developer's plan includes construction of a new 35,600 sq. ft. building that will operate as a
Mineshaft restaurant and family entertainment facility, and renovation of the existing commercial
building ("Project"). A portion of the renovated building would continue to be occupied by Rogan's
Shoes with most of the remaining space to be occupied by Extreme Customs, a technology and
automotive firm specializing in online sales of custom rims and tires. The Extreme Customs facilities will
include retail, office, product installation, and warehousing space. General Development Plans and
Specific Implementation Plans were approved for Extreme Customs on February 12, 2019 (Resolution
19-91) and Mineshaft on May 28, 2019 (Resolution 19-319). The District will be created to pay
incentives to reimburse the Developer for costs incurred related to the rehabilitation of public and private
infrastructure and improvements. The Project represents an estimated $22.8 million investment in the site
with approximately $500,000 to be funded with a WEDC Idle Sites Grant, $1.89 million with a
development incentive funded by the District,and the balance from private investment.
Authority
The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105.
Estimated Total Project Cost Expenditures
The City anticipates making total expenditures of approximately $4.84 million ("Project Costs") to
undertake the projects listed in this Project Plan ("Plan"). Project Costs include an estimated $1.89
million in development incentives, $2.75 million for additional public infrastructure improvements, and
an estimated $200,000 in District administrative expense.
Incremental Valuation
The City projects that an incremental increase in land and improvements value of approximately $12.4
million will result from the Project. Creation of this additional value will be made possible by the Project
Costs made within the District. Assumptions as to the development timing and associated values are
included in Section 10 of this Plan.
Expected Termination of District
Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within Section 10 of this Plan, the City anticipates that
the District will generate enough tax increment to pay all Project Costs by the year 2036, reflecting 16
years of tax increment collections, and 18 years of total elapsed time. A total of 7 years of tax increment
collections would be needed to repay the development incentive amount included in the Plan, with the
remaining years funding potential City infrastructure projects. If necessary, the District would be
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 4 July 2, 2019
permitted to remain open for up to 29 years, allowing for up to a total of 27 years of tax increment
collection.
Summary of Findings
As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan and the exhibits contained and
referenced herein,the following findings are made:
1. That "but for" the creation of this District, the development projected to occur as detailed
in this Plan: 1) would not occur; or 2) would not occur in the manner, at the values, or
within the timeframe desired by the City. In reaching this determination, the City has
considered that the commercial building in the District has remained largely vacant and
underutilized since 2015 with current occupancy of 17%. Deterioration of the building and site
improvements, as well as the need to rehabilitate public infrastructure serving the site, have
presented an impediment to leasing and redevelopment. The City does not have funds available to
pay for the costs of rehabilitating the public infrastructure and will require the Developer to
provide the funding less that portion expected to be paid from a WEDC Idle Sites Grant. The
requirement to fund the public infrastructure rehabilitation as well as the additional costs the
Developer will incur to address the on-site costs related to deteriorating site and building
improvements make it unlikely that the Project will proceed as proposed with the use of tax
incremental financing. The City therefore finds it to be reasonable and necessary to use tax
incremental financing to reimburse the Developer for the cost of the public infrastructure
rehabilitation and certain other on-site costs that will need to be made to allow the Project to
proceed.
2. The economic benefits of the District, as measured by increased employment, business and
personal income, and property value, are sufficient to compensate for the cost of the
improvements. In making this determination, the City has considered that in addition to the
incremental value expected to be created, the Project will provide increased employment
opportunities and space to accommodate retail and service businesses that will support residents
and workers in the area.
3. The benefits of the proposal outweigh the anticipated tax increments to be paid by the
owners of property in the overlying taxing jurisdictions. As required by Wis. Stat. §
66.1105(4)(1)4., a calculation of the share of projected tax increments estimated to be paid by the
owners of property in the overlying taxing jurisdictions has been prepared and can be found in
Appendix A of this plan. However, because the Project would not occur without the use of tax
incremental financing, these tax increments would not be paid but for creation of the District.
Accordingly, the City finds that the benefits expected to be realized as set forth in this Plan
outweigh the value of the tax increments to be invested in the Project.
4. Not less than 50% by area of the real property within the District is in need or rehabilitation or
conservation as defined by Wis. Stat. § 66.1337(2m)(a) and as further detailed in Section 5 of the
Plan.
5. Based on the foregoing finding, the District is designated as a district in need of rehabilitation or
conservation.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 5 July 2, 2019
6. The Project Costs relate directly to the rehabilitation or conservation of property in the District,
consistent with the purpose for which the District is created.
7. Improvements to be made in the District are likely to significantly enhance the value of
substantially all of the other real property in the District.
8. The equalized value of taxable property in the District, plus the incremental value of all existing
tax incremental districts within the City does not exceed 12% of the total equalized value of
taxable property within the City.
9. That there are no parcels to be included within the District that were annexed by the City within
the three-year period preceding adoption of this Resolution.
10. That approximately 75% of the territory within the District will be devoted to retail business at
the end of the District's maximum expenditure period, pursuant to Wisconsin Statutes Section
66.1105(5)(b).
11. The Plan for the District is feasible and is in conformity with the Master Plan of the City.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 6 July 2, 2019
SECTION 2:
Type and General Description of District
The District is a proposed district in need of rehabilitation or conservation consisting of five parcels and
approximately 27 acres collectively referred to as the Aviation Plaza center located northwest of the
intersection of W. South Park Ave. and S. Koeller Street and abutting Interstate 41. The existing
commercial building in the District contains approximately 117,000 sq. ft. of retail space with Rogan's
Shoes as the only current occupant following the closure of the J.C. Penny store in 2015. The Developer
has submitted a plan to redevelop the properties located within the District. The Developer's plan includes
construction of a new 35,600 sq. ft. building that will operate as a Mineshaft restaurant and family
entertainment facility, and renovation of the existing commercial building. A portion of the renovated
building would continue to be occupied by Rogan's Shoes with most of the remaining space to be
occupied by Extreme Customs, a technology and automotive firm specializing in online sales of custom
rims and tires. The Extreme Customs facilities will include retail, office, product installation, and
warehousing space. General Development Plans and Specific Implementation Plans were approved for
Extreme Customs on February 12, 2019 (Resolution 19-91) and Mineshaft on May 28, 2019 (Resolution
19-319). The District will be created to pay incentives to reimburse the Developer for costs incurred
related to the rehabilitation of public and private infrastructure and improvements. The Project represents
an estimated $22.8 million investment in the site with approximately $500,000 to be funded with a
WEDC Idle Sites Grant, $1.89 million with a development incentive funded by the District, and the
balance from private investment.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 7 July 2, 2019
SECTION 3:
Preliminary Maps of Proposed District Boundary
N Tax Increment District #37
.I E Aviation Plaza Redevelopment
s District Boundary C7shkOsh
r
1
IL
L7--
w 2WH AV '- —
r
CO,
ohs
Legend
TIC)#37 Boundary
o vs 150 300 450
Fao[
bawm N P.Fi H1l L rc My Praq.chl An T---",,,—11,2U19
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 8 July 2, 2019
Tax Increment District #37
E Aviation Plaza Redevelopment „
5 Parcel Identification Oshkosh
Tax Increment District#37-Aviation Plaza Redevelopment Parcel identification
Map Impray. Equalized Dwelling Census
ID Parcel# Owner Local Address Land Value Value Total Value Value class Units Tract 2vnrng
13,-M22-2034 MAS11RSOSIMOSiIIIC X41SK01I11.R51 $1,14,%AX) $ 52Y,3M $2,2/5,000 $2,4.M,3Y6 B [1 13 SMLI-PI)
2 13-2310-0404 ROGAN SIORB OSI MOSH LLC 2145 S KOLLLLR Si $ 625,'0W $ 63Y,/0U $1,265,6W $1,36/,625 B 0 13 SMU4,13
3 13-2310-0401 1'l1OLN1X RLALTYLLC 2175 S KOLLLLR S1 $ 399,100 $1,215,/00 $1,6/4,800 $I,W9,812 B 0 13 SMU-PL)
4 13-2310-0402 P1101MYREALTYLLC 2185SKOLLLLRST $ 75,200 $ 367,300 $ 442500 $ 478,172 B 0 13 SMU-Pl)
5 13-7310-0403 PHC)FNI%RFAI TYI I C S K0FI I FR ST $ M9,000 $ 54,500 1$ 623,500 $ 673,76.3 B 0 13 .SMIJ-PF7
TWALS-.1$3,414,904 1$2,866,5 0 1$6,261,4U0 $6,107,168
WnT AV-
1 �
C � �
% 4�114D A
13-2310-0401
1..11 9
T
e
13-2310-0402
Legend
TID#37 Boundary
yn, 0 75 150 $00 450
'V Feat
n�„mw P P+c.1scIAiDJec�c4\T�6 r1v. wn wnnn�x-fw. a ain�xr=a. n,-xd L57I®: I,pre 17,20I9
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 9 July 2, 2019
SECTION 4-
Maps Showing Existing Uses and Conditions
Tax Increment District #37
w E Aviation Plaza Redevelopment c„Yi
01
S Existing & Proposed Land Use Oshkosh
s0
a �
ti
a
a
a
a
a -
TID ' V
— #37
m �, 7afiLVlNdA'
r f P
I �J
;lei -
i;
Sq�GER RY
r�
Existing& Proposed Land Use
JerZ Commercial :♦•♦` Single&Two Family
ym D TO#37 Boundary - Industrial � Parks& Recreation
p +wQ t Parking Lot ® Institutional
Feet
LUGovernment Vacant Land
Dal*;Tuesday,June 11,.3L714 -
- infrastructure
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 10 July 2, 2019
Tax Increment District #37
W E Aviation Plaza Redevelopment cl,o
S
Existing Conditions Oshkosh
p
1.
e
,n
l I
^ F V
AV
Site Blighted, Underutilized,
in Need of Redevelopment = -�
� A»
1 Cn R
LfiG m Q�\'
r ��Q
� r
m
Existing T1D Cn
r'
low
Commercial #37 a .
R
Buildings , i 8 :
I
a r
I r
r � r
a I
0
Site Blighted,
Underutilized �Yo
/rye Z /
a " J Legend
-� -44
TI❑#37 Boundary
I
/ 0 76 160 300 450
I Feet
Oa= -.H-\Ivin\SLcNpyroi-,T1r,v.y—\no_�n„�otio�vloxG Reug�lop�„i\Abps�T^io a�E�sn�e-o Dote:Thu mdoy,June 13.2019
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 11 July 2, 2019
SECTION 5-
Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis
The following table identifies the parcels to be included in the District. The entirety of the District is an
area in need of rehabilitation or conservation as defined in Wis. Stat. § 66.1337(2m)(e). Specifically, the
District consists of land where:
1. Plans for a program of voluntarrepair and rehabilitation of buildings or other improvements will
be carried out. As part of the Project, the existing commercial building located in the District,
which is deteriorating and has a 17% occupancy rate, will be rehabilitated to accommodate the
relocation of Extreme Customs LLC's operations to the building.
2. Installation, construction or reconstruction of utilities and other improvements is necessary for
carrying out the objectives of an urban renewal project. As part of the Project, deteriorating
public infrastructure and private site improvements, which have presented an impediment to
leasing and redevelopment,will be rehabilitated.
Oshkosh,City of
Tax Increment District#37
Base Property Information'
Property Information Assessment Information Equalized Value District
Classification
Map
Equalized In Need of
ID# Parcel Number Street Address Owner Acreage Land Imp Total Value Land Imp Total Rehabilitation/
Ratio Conservation
1 13-3422-2034 2041 S KOELLER ST MASTERS OSHKOSH LLC 16.43 1,745,700 529,300 2,275,000 92.54% 1,886,427 571,969 2,458,396 16.43
2 13-2310-0404 2145 S KOELLER ST ROGAN STORES OSHKOSH LLC 3.53 625,900 639,700 1,265,600 92.54% 676,356 691,269 1,367,625 3.53
3 13-2310-0401 2175 S KOELLER ST PHOENIX REALTY LLC 2.38 399,100 1,275,700 1,674,800 92.54% 431,273 1,378,539 1,809,812 2.38
4 13-2310-0402 2185 S KOELLER ST PHOENIX REALTY LLC 0.45 75,200 367,300 442,500 92.54% 81,262 396,909 478,172 0.45
5 13-2310-0403 0 S KOELLER ST PHOENIX REALTY LLC 3.79 569,000 54,500 623,500 92.54% 614,869 58,893 673,763 3.79
3,414,900 2,866,500 6,281,400 3,690,188 3,097,579 6,787,767 26.58
100.00
Estimated Base Value 6,787,767
Notes:
Assessed values as of 1-1-2019 per City Assessor.Equalization ratio reflects estimated 1-1-2019 ratio as provided by City Assessor.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 12 July 2, 2019
SECTION 6:
Equalized Value Test
The following calculations demonstrate that the City expects to be in compliance with Wis. Stat. §
66.1105(4)(gm)4.c., which requires that the equalized value of the taxable property in the proposed
District,plus the value increment of all existing tax incremental districts,does not exceed 12%of the total
equalized value of taxable property within the City.
The equalized value of the increment of existing tax incremental districts within the City, plus the base
value of the proposed District,totals $154,498,067. This value is less than the maximum of$488,841,912
in equalized value that is permitted for the City.
City of Oshkosh, Wisconsin
ComplianceTax Increment District#37
r Valuation Test
.
District Creation Date 7/23/2019
Valuation Data
Currently Available
2018
Tota I EV(TI D In) 4,073,682,600
12%Test 488,841,912
Increment of Existing TI Ds 147,710,300
Projected Base of New or Amended District 61787,767
Total Value Subject to 12%Test 154,498,067
Compliance
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 13 July 2, 2019
SECTION 7:
Statement of Kind, Number and Location of Proposed
Public Works and Other Projects
Project Costs are any expenditure made, estimated to be made, or monetary obligations incurred or
estimated to be incurred as outlined in this Plan. Project Costs will be diminished by any income, special
assessments or other revenues, including user fees or charges, other than tax increments, received or
reasonably expected to be received in connection with the implementation of the Plan. If Project Costs
incurred benefit territory outside the District, a proportionate share of the cost is not a Project Cost. Costs
identified in this Plan are preliminary estimates made prior to design considerations and are subject to
change after planning, design and construction is completed. With all Project Costs, the costs of
engineering, design, survey, inspection, materials, construction, restoring property to its original
condition, apparatus necessary for public works, legal and other consultant fees, testing, environmental
studies,permits,updating City ordinances and plans,judgments or claims for damages and other expenses
are included as Project Costs. The following is a list of public works and other tax incremental financing
eligible Project Costs that the City expects to make, or may need to make, in conjunction with the
implementation of the District's Plan. The map found in Section 7 of this Plan along with the Detailed
List of Project Costs found in Section 9 provide additional information as to the kind, number and
location of potential Project Costs.
Public Improvements
Sanitary Sewer,Water System and Stormwater Management Improvements
The Project may require that the City make improvements to its sanitary sewer collection system, water
distribution system and stormwater management system. To the extent that improvements are necessitated
by, or provide a benefit to, the Project the City may allocate the cost, or a portion of the costs, to the
District. Any costs incurred by the City for improving the its utility systems that benefit the Project are
eligible Project Costs. Costs for such improvements may be made within the District, or outside the
District as permitted under Wis. Stat. § 66.1105(2)(f)l.k.
Sidewalks and Multi-Use Trails
The Project may require the City to install or improve sidewalks or multi-use trails to promote
connectivity to the District and to improve pedestrian safety. To the extent that improvements are
necessitated by, or provide a benefit to, the Project the City may allocate the cost, or a portion of the
costs,to the District. Any costs incurred by the City for installing improving sidewalks or multi-use trails
that benefit the Project are eligible Project Costs. Costs for such improvements may be made within the
District, or outside of but within '/z mile of the District's boundary as permitted under Wis. Stat. §
66.1105(2)(f)l.n.
Community Development
Cash Grants(Development Incentives)
The City may enter into agreements with property owners, lessees, or developers of land located within
the District for sharing costs to encourage the desired kind of improvements and assure tax base is
generated sufficient to recover Project Costs. No cash grants will be provided until the City executes a
developer agreement with the recipient of the cash grant. Any payments of cash grants made by the City
are eligible Project Costs.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 14 July 2, 2019
Miscellaneous
Professional Service and Organizational Costs
The costs of professional services rendered, and other costs incurred, in relation to the creation,
administration and termination of the District, and the undertaking of the projects contained within this
Plan, are eligible Project Costs. Professional services include but are not limited to: architectural;
environmental; planning; engineering; legal; audit; financial; and the costs of informing the public with
respect to the creation of the District and the implementation of the Plan.
Administrative Costs
The City may charge to the District as eligible Project Costs reasonable allocations of administrative
costs, including,but not limited to, employee salaries. Costs allocated will bear a direct connection to the
time spent by City employees relating to the implementation of the Plan.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 15 July 2, 2019
SECTION 8-
Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses
" Tax Increment District #37
W E Aviation Plaza Redevelopment
ov
Proposed Improvements Oshkosh
` ion .tt yh 4^r dP t -
2UTH AV _ -
Proposed Mineshaft Restaurant)
Family Entertainment Complex,
Site Improvements/Landscaping I�g
TID
1
R
�Y
#37 �. s
,` Ill)qll 111 ■ � ..
a '.IM15i=
H S,_
II
Y
Cl)
Legend
44 TID#37 Boundary
15U HU 45U
Feel
f* I
� �ofe:Th ursdoy,June 13,2019
Oas o'F _Pr �sY71 �A fion --I�
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 16 July 2, 2019
Tax Increment District #37
E Aviation Plaza Redevelopment cilyv
_ Existing & Proposed Land Use Oshkosh
rrrf s i
t
a
lu _
- - --W 2U't=H=►4V —
9
,
TlD :f.
#17
p ,�� 7"A�IL WdND A
m �..
1 �
BADGER AV
Existing& Proposed Land Use
Commercial .'a'.• Single&Two Family
ED�m� n Tf0#37 Boundary — Industrial ` Parks&Recreation
Feet
Parking Lot institutional
Government Vacant Land
Dote:Tuesday,tune 11,2019
Infrastructure
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 17 July 2, 2019
SECTION 9:
Detailed List of Project Costs
The following list identifies the Project Costs that the City currently expects to incur in implementing the
District's Plan. All projects identified, and related costs reflect the best estimates available as of the date
of preparation of this Plan. All costs are preliminary estimates and may increase or decrease. Certain
Project Costs listed may become unnecessary, and other Project Costs not currently identified may need
to be made. (Section 7 details the general categories of eligible Project Costs). Changes in Project Cost
totals or the types of Project Costs to be incurred will not require that this Plan be amended. This Plan is
not meant to be a budget nor an appropriation of funds for specific Project Costs,but a framework within
which to manage Project Costs.
City of Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Tax Increment District#37
Detailed List of Project
General
Extreme District
Project Name/Type Mineshaft Customs Rogan's Costs Total
2022-2027 2022-2027 2022-2027 2019-2047
Development Incentives'
Sewer&Water Reimbursement 62,998 169,320 136,876 369,194
Stormwater Reimbursement 147,392 105,697 85,445 338,534
Other On-Site Improvements Reimbursement 227,232 227,232
Drive Apron&Curb Reimbursement 171,240 171,240
Building Improvements Reimbursement 87,724 87,724
Development Wide Stormwater Reimbursement 515,616 515,616
Estimated Interest on Incentive 63,595 37,888 23,221 178,559
Public Infrastructure 2,750,000 2,750,000
TIF Administrative Expenses 200,256 200,256
Total Projects 672,457 400,629 245,542 3,465,872 4,938,355
Notes:
Incentive amount shown for purposes of establishing economic feasibility only.The City has not agreed to terms or conditions with the
proposed Developer as to any public participation in the project.
The Development Incentives noted on the above table consist of payments that will be made to reimburse
the Developer for the following specific work items:
• Sewer and Water Reimbursement—Upgrading the water and sanitary laterals on site that are currently
not in compliance with City or State code.
• Stormwater Reimbursement—Upgrading the entire 26 acre site's stormwater management system to
meet City and State code.
• Other On-Site Improvements Reimbursements — Engineering, geotechnical testing, relocating and
installing utilities, and restoration related to the utility improvements.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 18 July 2, 2019
• Drive Apron and Curb Reimbursement—Reconstructing the drive apron and curb in the right of way
to meet City code.
• Building Improvements Reimbursement—Building renovations include replacing the HVAC system,
replacing interior and exterior concrete and masonry that is beyond repair, replacing part of the fire
protection piping for the system, updating the plumbing fixtures and equipment, and ensuring the
electrical service meets the needs of the business.
• Development-Wide Stormwater Reimbursement— The required stormwater management facility for
the entire Aviation Plaza site will be located on the Mineshaft property due to the topography of the
site. Funds may be reimbursed for constructing a stormwater management facility that provides the
quality and quantity stormwater requirements that Extreme Customs, Rogan's, and the Mineshaft are
required to provide per City and State code.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 19 July 2, 2019
SECTION 10:
Economic Feasibility Study, Financing Methods, and the
Time When Costs or Monetary Obligations Related are to
be Incurred
This Section includes a forecast of the valuation increases expected within the District, the associated tax
increment collections, a summary of how Project Costs would be financed, and a projected cash flow
demonstrating that the District is economically feasible.
Key Assumptions
The Project Costs the City plans to make are expected to create $12.4 million in incremental value by
January 1, 2021. The development Project estimated valuations and timing are included in Table 1.
Assuming the City's current equalized TID Interim tax rate of$25.11 per thousand of equalized value,
and no economic appreciation or depreciation, the Project would generate $8,307,870 in incremental tax
revenue over the 27-year term of the District as shown in Table 2.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 20 July 2, 2019
City of Oshkosh
DevelopmentTax Increment District No. 37
Base Value of
Construction Year Mineshaft Extreme Customs Ro an's Annual Total Construction Year
Improvements
1 2019 (3,097,579) 5,500,000 4,300,000 1,750,000 8,452,421 2019 1
2 2020 3,950,000 3,950,000 2020 2
3 2021 0 2021 3
4 2022 0 2022 4
5 2023 0 2023 5
6 2024 0 2024 6
7 2025 0 2025 7
8 2026 0 2026 8
9 2027 0 2027 9
10 2028 0 2028 10
11 2029 0 2029 11
12 2030 0 2030 12
13 2031 0 2031 13
14 2032 0 2032 14
15 2033 0 2033 15
16 2034 0 2034 16
17 2035 0 2035 17
18 2036 0 2036 18
19 2037 0 2037 19
20 2038 0 2038 20
21 2039 0 2039 21
22 2040 0 2040 22
23 2041 0 2041 23
24 2042 0 2042 24
25 2043 0 2043 25
26 2044 0 2044 26
27 2045 0 2045 27
Totals (3,097,579) 9,450,000 4,300,000 1,750,000 12,402,421
Notes:
'Estimate of valuation increase within District resultingfrom construction of restaurant building and renovations to be made to existing commercial
building.Assumptions as to value and timingtaken from information received from Developer dated 6-6-2019.
Reflects existing valuation of land and improvements within the District as of January 1,2019.This value is subtracted to calculate the projected
incremental value.(The numbers shown to the right of this column reflect total value).
Table 1 —Development Assumptions
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 21 July 2, 2019
OshkoshCity of
Tax Increment District No. 37
Tax Increment Projection Worksheet
Type of District Blighted Area Base Value 6,787,767
District Creation Date July 23,2019 Appreciation Factor 0.00%
Valuation Date Jan 1, 1 2019 Base Tax Rate $25.11
Max Life(Years) 27 Rate Adjustment Factor
Expenditure Period/Termination 22 1 7/23/2041
Revenue Periods/Final Year 27 2047
Extension Eligibility/Years Yes1 3 Tax Exempt Discount Rate 0.00%
Recipient District Yes Taxable Discount Rate 0.00%
Construction Inflation Total
Year Value Added Valuation Year Increment Increment Revenue Year Tax Rate' Tax I ncrement
1 2019 8,452,421 2020 0 8,452,421 2021 $25.11 212,204
2 2020 3,950,000 2021 0 12,402,421 2022 $25.11 311,372
3 2021 0 2022 0 12,402,421 2023 $25.11 311,372
4 2022 0 2023 0 12,402,421 2024 $25.11 311,372
5 2023 0 2024 0 12,402,421 2025 $25.11 311,372
6 2024 0 2025 0 12,402,421 2026 $25.11 311,372
7 2025 0 2026 0 12,402,421 2027 $25.11 311,372
8 2026 0 2027 0 12,402,421 2028 $25.11 311,372
9 2027 0 2028 0 12,402,421 2029 $25.11 311,372
10 2028 0 2029 0 12,402,421 2030 $25.11 311,372
11 2029 0 2030 0 12,402,421 2031 $25.11 311,372
12 2030 0 2031 0 12,402,421 2032 $25.11 311,372
13 2031 0 2032 0 12,402,421 2033 $25.11 311,372
14 2032 0 2033 0 12,402,421 2034 $25.11 311,372
15 2033 0 2034 0 12,402,421 2035 $25.11 311,372
16 2034 0 2035 0 12,402,421 2036 $25.11 311,372
17 2035 0 2036 0 12,402,421 2037 $25.11 311,372
18 2036 0 2037 0 12,402,421 2038 $25.11 311,372
19 2037 0 2038 0 12,402,421 2039 $25.11 311,372
20 2038 0 2039 0 12,402,421 2040 $25.11 311,372
21 2039 0 2040 0 12,402,421 2041 $25.11 311,372
22 2040 0 2041 0 12,402,421 2042 $25.11 311,372
23 2041 0 2042 0 12,402,421 2043 $25.11 311,372
24 2042 0 2043 0 12,402,421 2044 $25.11 311,372
25 2043 0 2044 0 12,402,421 2045 $25.11 311,372
26 2044 0 2045 0 12,402,421 2046 $25.11 311,372
27 2045 0 2046 0 12,402,421 2047 $25.11 311,372
Totals 1 ,+1tS ,421 Future Value of Increment 8,307,870
Notes:
Tax rate shown is actual rate for 2018/19 levy taken from DOR Form PC-202(Tax Increment Collection Worksheet).
Table 2—Tax Increment Projection Worksheet
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 22 July 2, 2019
Financine and Implementation
Expected District Project Costs consist of development incentives in an estimated amount of $1.89
million, $2.75 million for additional public infrastructure improvements and an estimated $200,000 in
District administrative expense. Project Costs will be paid from tax increment as it is received, and the
City's obligation to make development incentive payments will be limited to tax increment generated by
the Project and subject to annual appropriation. The City will advance funds as needed to pay District
administrative expenses prior to the availability of tax increments. To the extent public infrastructure
improvements are required prior to the availability of tax increment to cash fund them, the City may
advance funds to the District,or may issue debt to finance the costs.
Based on the cash flow exhibit (Table 3), the City anticipates that the District will generate enough tax
increment to pay all Project Costs by the year 2036, reflecting 16 years of tax increment collections, and
18 years of total elapsed time. A total of 7 years of tax increment collections would be needed to repay
the development incentive amount included in the Plan, with the remaining years funding potential City
infrastructure projects. If necessary, the District would be permitted to remain open for up to 29 years,
allowing for up to a total of 27 years of tax increment collection. The projected early closure is based on
the various assumptions noted in this Plan and will vary dependent on actual Project Costs incurred and
the actual amount of tax increments collected.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 23 July 2, 2019
Cash Flow
OshkoshCity of
Tax Increment District No.37
Cash Flow Projection
Projected Revenues Projected Expenditures Balances
Municipal Revenue Obligation(MRO)'
Year 1,709,540 Public Total MRO Principal
Tax Increments Total Revenues Principal Int.Rate Interest Infrastructure TIF Admin. Expenditures Annual Cumulative Outstanding Year
2019 0 15,000 15,000 (15,000) (15,000) 2019
2020 0 5,000 5,000 (5,000) (20,000) 2020
2021 212,204 212,204 5,100 5,100 207,104 187,104 1,709,540 2021
2022 311,372 311,372 235,359 2.625% 44,875 5,202 285,437 25,935 213,039 1,474,181 2022
2023 311,372 311,372 241,537 2.625% 38,697 5,306 285,541 25,831 238,870 1,232,643 2023
2024 311,372 311,372 247,878 2.625% 32,357 5,412 285,647 25,725 264,595 984,766 2024
2025 311,372 311,372 254,384 2.625% 25,850 5,520 285,755 25,617 290,212 730,381 2025
2026 311,372 311,372 261,062 2.625% 19,173 5,631 285,865 25,506 315,719 469,319 2026
2027 311,372 311,372 267,915 2.625% 12,320 5,743 285,978 25,394 341,112 201,404 2027
2028 311,372 311,372 201,404 2.625% 5,287 300,000 5,858 512,549 (201,178) 139,935 0 2028
2029 311,372 311,372 300,000 5,975 305,975 5,396 145,331 0 2029
2030 311,372 311,372 300,000 6,095 306,095 5,277 150,608 0 2030
2031 311,372 311,372 300,000 6,217 306,217 5,155 155,763 0 2031
2032 311,372 311,372 300,000 6,341 306,341 5,031 160,793 0 2032
2033 311,372 311,372 300,000 6,468 306,468 4,904 165,697 0 2033
2034 311,372 311,372 300,000 6,597 306,597 4,774 170,471 0 2034
2035 311,372 311,372 300,000 6,729 306,729 4,642 175,114 0 2035
2036 311,372 311,372 350,000 6,864 356,864 (45,492) 129,622 0 2036
2037 311,372 311,372 7,001 7,001 304,371 433,992 0 2037
2038 311,372 311,372 7,141 7,141 304,231 738,223 0 2038
2039 311,372 311,372 7,284 7,284 304,088 1,042,310 0 2039
2040 311,372 311,372 7,430 7,430 303,942 1,346,252 0 2040
2041 311,372 311,372 7,578 7,578 303,793 1,650,046 0 2041
2042 311,372 311,372 7,730 7,730 303,642 1,953,688 0 2042
2043 311,372 311,372 7,884 7,884 303,487 2,257,175 0 2043
2044 311,372 311,372 8,042 8,042 303,330 2,560,505 0 2044
2045 311,372 311,372 8,203 8,203 303,169 2,863,673 0 2045
2046 311,372 311,372 8,367 8,367 303,005 3,166,678 0 2046
2047 311,372 311,372 0 8,534 8,534 302,837 3,469,515 0 2047
L.Tota 8,307,870 8,307,870 1,709,540 178,559 2,750,000 200,256 4,838,355 Total
allocation of 90%of increment to MRO payment.Incentive amounts,payment percentages and term shown for purposes of establishing Projected TID Closure
feasibility only.The Cityhas not agreed to terms or conditions with the proposed Developer as to anypublic participation in the project.
Table 3
TID No.36 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 24 June 12,2019
SECTION 11 :
Annexed Property
A tax incremental district cannot include annexed territory unless at least three years have elapsed since
the annexation, or certain other requirements are met. None of the property within the proposed District
boundary was annexed during the past three years.
SECTION 12:
Estimate of Property to be Devoted to Retail Business
Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 66.1105(5)(b),the City estimates that 75% of the territory within the District will
be devoted to retail business at the end of the District's maximum expenditure period.
SECTION 13:
Proposed Zoning Ordinance Changes
The proposed Plan is in general conformance with the City's current zoning ordinances. Individual
properties may require rezoning at the time of development.
SECTION 14:
Proposed Changes in Master Plan, Map, Building Codes
and City of Oshkosh Ordinances
The proposed Plan is in general conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan identifying the area as
appropriate for commercial land uses. Development within the District will be required to conform to
State Building Codes and will be subject to the City's permitting and inspection procedures. The proposed
Plan conforms to all relevant State and local ordinances, plans, and codes. No changes to the existing
regulations are proposed or needed.
SECTION 15:
Relocation
Implementation of this Plan will not require relocation of individuals or business operations. Should
implementation of this Plan require relocation of individuals or business operations, relocations will be
handled in compliance with Wis. Stat. Chapter 32 and Wis.Admin. Code ADM 92.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 25 July 2, 2019
SECTION 16:
Orderly Development of the City of Oshkosh
Creation of the District and the implementation of the projects in its Plan will promote the orderly
development of the City through elimination of blight and the provision of appropriate financial
incentives that will create opportunities for mixed use development. Through use of tax increment
financing, the City can attract new investment that results in increased tax base. Development will occur
in an orderly fashion in accordance with approved plans so that the Projects will be compatible with
adjacent land uses. Development of new uses in the District will add to the tax base and will generate
positive secondary impacts in the community such as increased employment opportunities and space to
accommodate retail and service businesses that will support residents and workers in the area.
SECTION 17:
List of Estimated Non-Project Costs
Non-project costs are public works projects which only partly benefit the District. Costs incurred that do
not benefit the District may not be paid with tax increments. Examples of non-project costs are:
• A public improvement made within the District that also benefits property outside the District.
That portion of the total Project Costs allocable to properties outside of the District would be a
non-project cost.
• A public improvement made outside the District that only partially benefits property within the
District. That portion of the total Project Costs allocable to properties outside of the District
would be a non-project cost.
• Projects undertaken within the District as part of the implementation of this Project Plan,the costs
of which are paid fully or in part by impact fees, grants, special assessments, or revenues other
than tax increments.
At present, the City has not identified any non-project costs other than those costs expected to be paid
from the WEDC Idle Sites grant which are not included within this Plan. To the extent: 1) improvements
are made within the District that benefit property outside the District; or 2) improvements are made
outside the District that will only partially benefit the District;the City will apportion those costs based on
a reasonable allocation of the benefit. The costs related to benefit received by properties outside the
District are non-project costs.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 26 July 2, 2019
SECTION 18:
Opinion of Attorney for the City of Oshkosh Advising
Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with
Wisconsin Statutes 66. 1105
I^A
City
f
Oshkosh
June 26,2019
H.Allen Davis
Director of Community Development
City of Oshkosh
215 Church Avenue
Oshkosh,WI54903-1130
Dear Mr.Davis:
I reviewed the project plan for, City of Oshkosh Tax Increment District #37 Aviation Plaza
Redevelopment,pursuant to Section 66.1105(4)(f)of the Wisconsin Statutes.I find that the plan includes
a statement listing the kind,number,and location of proposed public improvements within and outside
the District. It includes an economic feasibility study, a detailed list of estimated project costs, and a
description of the method of financing all estimated project costs, the time when the costs are to be
incurred, and a list of estimated non-project costs. The plan contains maps of existing uses and
conditions of real property, as well as, proposed improvements and uses. The plan identifies any
proposed changes in zoning of the real property in the district,and any proposed changes in the City's
master plan, map or other municipal codes required or proposed as part of the district. The plan
includes a statement of the proposed method for relocation of any persons to be displaced. The plan
further specifies that the district will promote the orderly development within the City, which is
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan(Master Plan),building codes,and other city ordinances
in relation to project elements.
Upon adoption of the project plan by the Plan Commission and their submission to the City Council,all
requirements of Section 66.1105(4)(f), Wisconsin Statutes, will be complete and it is, therefore, my
opinion that the project plan attached hereto is complete and complies with Wis.Stat.§66.1105.
Sincerely,
IOF OSH.Lorenson
City Attorney
LL/tw
City Attorney
City Hall,215 Church Avenue P.O.Box 1130 Oshkosh,WI 54903-1130 920.236.5115 http://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 27 July 2, 2019
Exhibit A:
Calculation of the Share of Projected Tax Increments
Estimated to be Paid by the Owners of Property in the
Overlying Taxing Jurisdictions
PortionEstimated Owners
Overlaying D
DOR Form PC-202 2018/19 Percentage
Winnebago County 749,693 20.22%
City of Oshkosh 1,482,441 39.98%
Oshkosh Area School District 1,320,217 35.60%
Fox Valley Techncial College 156,024 4.21%
Fox Valley
Winnebago Oshkosh Area Techncial
Revenue Year County City of Oshkosh School District College Total Revenue Year
2021 42,900 84,830 75,547 8,928 212,204 2021
2022 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2022
2023 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2023
2024 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2024
2025 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2025
2026 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2026
2027 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2027
2028 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2028
2029 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2029
2030 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2030
2031 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2031
2032 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2032
2033 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2033
2034 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2034
2035 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2035
2036 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2036
2037 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2037
2038 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2038
2039 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2039
2040 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2040
2041 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2041
2042 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2042
2043 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2043
2044 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2044
2045 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2045
2046 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2046
2047 62,948 124,472 110,851 13,100 311,372 2047
Total 1,679,537 3,321,112 2,957,681 349,541 8,307,870
Notes:
The projection shown above is provided to meet the requirements of Wis. Stat. §66.1105(4)(i)4.
TID No. 37 Project Plan City of Oshkosh
Prepared by Ehlers Page 28 July 2, 2019
TIF APPLICATION
May 2, 2019 RECEIVED
Mr. Mark Rohloff f'JAY 2 2019
Oshkosh City Manager
215 Church Ave CUAIMUNI'I'y DEVE1-OPMENT
Oshkosh,WI 54901
Dear Mr Rohloff,
On behalf of the property owners of the Aviation Plaza center, please accept this request for tax
increment assistance that we believe to be needed in order to bring the overall project to fruition. As
you well know, the aviation plaza sits mostly vacant today. In 2015,JC Penny closed down their store
leaving Rogan's shoes the only operation to remain open. In total the site has approximately 116,668
square feet of retail space available, however with only Rogan's in operation, only 16.7%of the space is
being utilized.
Our plan includes the construction of a new 35,600 sf building that will house a new Mineshaft
restaurant and family entertainment facility. We anticipate this venture will bring in 10,000- 12,000
customers per week. In addition,the JC Penny/Miles Kimball site will be substantially renovated to
house Extreme Customs, a growing technology/automotive firm that specializes in online sales of
custom rims and tires.The new facility will house a retail space, a fair amount of office space, a shop for
local installation of products, and substantial warehouse space.
As you are aware, the redevelopment of this site is made difficult by several factors. First,the site has
zoning restrictions due to the proximity to the adjacent airport limiting the potential uses. Next,the site
was originally developed as one single parcel. A single water and sewer lateral comes in off of Koeller St
and served the original Walmart facility, the adjacent strip mall, what now serves as the Rogan's shoes
store, and the old JC Penny/Miles Kimball buildings. Public Service Commission rules no longer allow a
shared water lateral. Should the proposed development occur, or any other development for that
matter,the non-conforming laterals must be corrected, such that each building or separate parcel will
need its own water laterals. We will also have to address stormwater for the site, however, the
department of public works have also requested of us to provide increased capacity than minimally
required in an effort to aid in the overall 5tringham Creek water management.
We anticipate the projects starting mid-June.The Extreme Customs renovation and the Rogan's Shoes
water laterals should be completed by November of this year.We further anticipate the construction of
the Mineshaft facility to be completed by April of 2020.
The total development investment in the Mineshaft facility and associated site improvements is
approximately$16.1 Million.The Mineshaft team has$8 million in financing committed.They are
contributing just short of$3.9 million in land and equity and bringing$2.75 million on cash. Extreme
customs will make an overall investment of approximately$5.75 million and has arranged financing
through Hometown bank, while Rogan's will invest approximately$262K in site infrastructure
improvements. Overall,we have identified $2,359,290 in public and site improvement costs. We have
applied for$500,000 of assistance through the WEDC Idle Sites grant, leaving$1,859,290 in TIF eligible
expenses. We are requesting$1,704,760 in TIF assistance, in part to keep the total payback within 10
years.
Page 29
An investment analysis was conducted on the Mineshaft development plan and found that the 10 year
internal rate of return without TIF was 12.52%. With TIF it is 15.11%. While the IRR in part, paints the
picture of need, more importantly the TIF assistance reduces the amount of cash needed to complete
the project. Given the banks limitation of$8 million in financing, the development team must bring in
roughly 50% in equity to make this happen without TIF. In contrast, more typical development scenarios
like apartments or commercial office space might only require 20%-30% equity.
The overall redevelopment of this site will provide substantial public benefit. As a major gateway entry
point to the city, this site was listed as a goal for redevelopment in the City's Central Corridors plan. The
Mineshaft facility will be a major draw bringing in 10,000- 12,000 patrons weekly. Experience from the
Hartford locations suggests that many of these patrons will draw from the surrounding region.The
Mineshaft facility may add well over 100 new jobs. Extreme Customs will retain 32 existing jobs in
Oshkosh and add an addition 10 in the next year which include full benefits. Also, the increased
stormwater capacity above the site requirements will benefit neighboring site and those downstream of
the Stringham creek basin.
We project this development will add roughly$14 million in increment and that the requested incentive
can be paid back in 10 years.
In order to make this overall site redevelopment work TIF assistance will be needed. For the Mineshaft
project, the extreme additional site cost would require the development team to bring in 50%equity
stake without assistance. Moreover, without TIF the 10 year rate of return is 12.5%. Consistent with the
presentation given to the Common Council by Ehlers in the June 2017 TIF workshop, the required return
should reflect the risk proposed. Given the equity position requirements and the risk associated with
restaurant/entertainment facilities, we find 12.5% is insufficient to proceed. For Extreme Customs, the
redevelopment costs surpass 90%of the fair market value of the existing land and buildings. These
extraordinary costs make the redevelopment financially prohibitive without the TIF assistance.
We greatly appreciate the support and assistance your staff has provided in helping us understand the
site issues and putting together the requisite materials for requesting TIF assistance. We strongly believe
that the redevelopment we are proposing will be a substantial benefit to the city and again affirm that
without TIF assistance these projects would not move forward. Please feel free to contact any of us with
any questions you may have. We look forward to working together with the city to return this site back
to the economic center we know it can be.
Sincerely,
Mineshaft Oshkosh Extreme Customs
Page 30
�0� NOS
�
®r,
ROGAN SHOES, INC.
1750 Ohio Street
Racine, Wisconsin 53405
262-637-3613
April 29, 2019
Mr. Mark Rohloff
Oshkosh City Manager
215 Church Avenue
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901
Re: Aviation Plaza
Dear Mr. Rohloff:
As you are aware, Rogan's Shoes is the owner of one of the parcels at
Aviation Plaza. Our property is between the parcels proposed for the
Mineshaft and Extreme Rims redevelopments.
We are writing to request tax increment assistance for the Aviation Plaza
developments. We fully support the redevelopments proposed by Mineshaft
and Extreme Rims.
Rogan's Shoes is willing to invest approximately $262,000 for installation of
a new water line, shared sanitary sewer fine with Custom Rims and a shared
storm water infrastructure at Aviation Plaza provided that we receive TIF
assistance.
We understand that both Mineshaft and Custom rims have indicated that
TIF assistance is necessary for their respective redevelopments to occur.
Through the years, Rogan's Shoes has witnessed the death of Aviation
Plaza as a shopping destination. This occurred despite the fact that
Aviation Plaza is in a highly visible location. Except for our store, Aviation
Plaza's buildings are either empty or have been torn down. That, together
with the appearance of the empty and vacant portions of Aviation Plaza,
unequivocally sends a message of deterioration and blight.
Page 31
Furthermore, there has not been any conventionally financed
redevelopment at Aviation Plaza over the many years that vast portions of
Aviation Plaza have been empty. In our view, the marketplace has clearly
indicated that TIF financing is necessary for redevelopment to take place
at Aviation Plaza, as we believe that a non-TIF financed redevelopment
would have already occurred at Aviation Plaza if such a redevelopment was
viable.
We appreciate the consideration of this request.
Very truly yours,
o Shoes, Inc.
Patric A. Rogan
Presi ent
Page 32
• Tax Incremental Financing
Policy and Application
Sources and Uses of Funds
Identify the sources of funds used to finance the project. Typical sources include equity,
lender financing, mezzanine financing, government financing, other anticipated types
of public assistance, and any other types or methods of financing.
Uses of Funds Amount ($) $ per SF of Building Area
Land Acquisition: $3,250,000
Demolition:
Environmental Remediation:
Site Clearance and Preparation:
Soft Costs/ Fees: $1.082 522
Soft Cost Contingency: $140,000
Hard Construction Costs: $8,065,786
Total Project Costs: $16,101,413
Sources of Funds of total project costs
Equity
Developer Equity: $ 3,894,463 24
Other Equity:(,a9h.,_._..._._} $ 2,752,403 17 %
Total Equity: $ 6,646.866 41 %®
Loans Rate Term
Construction Financing: $ 8,000,000 5.375 % 12 mos. 50
Permanent Financing: $_ '9,nnn,nnn 5.25 % 20 yrs. 5Q %
TIF Assistance $ 1,237,710 8 %
Other: ( vvFnr _i r ) $ 216,837 1 %
Total Sources of Funds $16,101,413 100%
Financing
Source Amount Terms: Years/interest Contact Information
Equity:
Loans 1 : BMO Harris Bank �262) 783 1094
2:
3:
4:
Page 33
• Tax Incremental Financing
� Policy nd
a Application
Project Timetable Date
Final Plan/Specification Preparation: May 2019
Bidding and Contracting May 2019
Firm Financing Approval: April 2019
Construction/Rehabilitation: July 2019 -April 2020
Landscaping/Site Work: —'July 2019 -April 2020
Occupancy/Lease Up: April 2020
Development Team
Developer: . Tom Ma$t
Architect: Keller Structures _
Surveyor: c
Contractor: Keller Structures
Other Members:
Describe Team expertise and experience in developing similar projects:
Mr Masters has several decades of en xperience operating the Hartford Mineshaft location along with
the Fox and Hounds. }Seller Structures has significanteKserience building various commercial buildings
Other current Team projects in development:
None
Financial ability of the applicant to complete the project:
Ownership team has cash and equity required to bring project to completion after financing commitment.
BMO Harris bank has provided a letter of commitment for financing.
History of use of other city or government financial incentives:
A paa of this RrQipct the Aviation plaza team bas requested assistance thrnuah the WFnC: Idle
Sites Grant program.
Professional Studies
Market Studies: Applications for commercial and residential projects may at the option
of the city be required to include a comprehensive market study. The market study
should identify target markets, analysis of competition, demographics, market rents,
letters of intent/interest from prospective tenants, or for housing developments, sale
prices or rental rates of comparable properties.
Appraisal: All projects that involve the transfer of land may at the option of the city
include a recent appraisal. Projects that include land as a form of equity or collateral
must also submit a recent appraisal. The appraisal must value the property "as is", and
the impact on value must be considered for such items as demolition, environmental
remediation, relocation of utilities, lease buy-outs, and other work necessary to make
the site developable. The property must be valued assuming that the highest and
best use is the proposed use,
Page 34
• Tax Incremental Financing
Policy and Application
Overall Pro ect Summary and Objectives:
_]0 uare foot restaurant and entertainment facility address storm water management
Issues as part of the Aviation Plaza group, redo the surface parking, address PSC requirements for laterals,
and generally redevelop the northern most parcel of Aviation Plaza.
Current and Proposed Uses:
— rurrantly Sin gfeA mmArdl -U.Ilding that 1s_a_ppmAmately 20,(l00 sn fe®t sits vacant. This building haste?units.
We intend to use the larger unit as a support facility for the new 35,600 restaurant/gaming facility, The
remaining unit we Intend make Into a condominium and sell, or possibly lease.
Description of End Users:
The-Mineshaft restaurant an-d-famfly-entedainment center will provide low cost meals In a family oriented dInIng—
environment. In addition, approximately half of the facility will be used for a large game room and private party
rooms,
Property Summary: Describe any zoning changes that will be needed:
Parcel/Land Area: SF _ No zoning changes
Building Area: SF
# of Dwelling Units:
# of Stories:
# of Parking Spaces:
Identify any other approvals, permits or licenses (i.e. Liquor License, Health Department, etc):
Will need liquor license and health department approval to open the restaurant.
Describe briefly what the project will do for the property and neighborhood:
Construction of the new building and updating the parking lot and landscaping will substantially improve the
appearance of the site, The storm water management capabilities will Improve the overall management of
the Stringham creek water shed, We anticipate the entertainment facility to draw approximately 10 to
12,000 visitors to the site substantially improving the viability of other commercial enterprises with the
increased traffic.
Page 35
Tax Incremental Financing
Policy and
Application
Please complete and submit the following information to the City of Oshkosh for a more detailed review of
the feasibility of your request for Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) assistance. The application is comprised of
five parts:
1, Applicant Information
2, Project/Property Information
3, Project Narrative
4, Project Budget/Financial Information
5, Buyer Certification and Acknowledgement.
Where there is not enough space for your response or additional information is requested, please use an
attachment. Use attachments only when necessary and to provide clarifying or additional information,
The Department of Community Development (DCD) reviews all applications for TIF assistance. Failure to
provide all required information in a complete and accurate manner could delay processing of your
application and DCD reserves the right to reject or halt processing the application for incomplete
submittals,
For further Information please refer to the "City of Oshkosh Tax Incremental Financing Policy" document or
call the Economic Develo ment Division at 920.235,5055
Applicant Information:
Legal Name: Mineshaft Oshkosh, LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 270422
Primary Contact tt: 262 224 0652 Cell it: _
E-mail: FAX##;
Attorney:
Legal Entity: Individual(s) Joint Tenants Tenants in Common
Corporation X LLC Partnership Other
If not a Wisconsin corporation/partnership/LLC, state where organized:
Will a new entity be created for ownerships Yes No
Principals of existing or propoied corporation/partnership/LLC and extent of ownership interest,
Name: Address: Title: Inferest:
Tom Masters 5488 Pleasant Hill Road Hartford WI Managing member 100%
Is any owner, member, stockholder, partner, officer or director of any previously identified entities,
or any member of the lmmediate family of any such person, an employee of the City of
OshkosM Yes No X
If yes, give the name and relationship of the employee:
Have any of the applicants (including the principals of the corpora tlon/part nership/LLC) ever
been charged or convicted of a misdemeanor or felony? Yes X No
If yes, please furnish details:
Forty-seven years atno Mr Masters was convicted of a felonystiug-possesslo cn harge. The charge was Giffisp uently
pardoned by the Governor of the State of Wisconsin.
Page 36
• Tax Incremental Financing
• P olicy n
a and Application
_ . . . . . . 1
Piling Requirements
You must provide all of the following items with your signed application;
I. Pee: An application fee of 1%of the requested TIF assistance or $10,000, whichever is
greater, This fee is to cover City costs associated with evaluating the TIF application
and does not cover the use of outside consultants, which If required will be paid for
by the applicant, Make your check payable to the City of Oshkosh.
2. Site Maps: Provide a map that shows fhe location of the site, Also provide a map
that focuses on the project and its immediate surroundings. Both maps should be no
larger than 11 xl 7 inches. Larger maps will be required for projects presented to the
Plan Commission, Redevelopment Authority, or Common Council,
3. Project Renderings: Provide preliminary architectural drawings, plans and renderings
for the project. These drawings should be no larger than 11 x17 inches. Larger maps
will be required for projects presented to the Plan Commission, Redevelopment
Authority, or Common Council.
Notes
• The City retains an administrative fee of 5% of the annual tax increment revenue.
• If the project requires planning and zoning approvals, you must make these applications
concurrent with this request,
Agreement
I, by signing this application, agree to fhe following:
1. I have read and will abide by all the requirements of the City for Tax Incremental
Financing,
2. The information submitted is correct,
3. 1 agree to pay all costs involved in developing Project Plan or Development
Agreement. These costs may include, but not be limited to, bond counsel, outside
legal assistance, outside financial assistance, planning, engineering, etc. and all
costs involved in the issuance of the bonds or loans to finance the project,
4. 1 understand that the City reserves the right to deny final approval, regardless of
preliminary approval or the degree of construction completed before application
for final approval,
5. The undersigned authorizes the City of Oshkosh to check credit references and verify
financial and other information.
6. The undersigned also agrees to provide any additional Information as may be
requested by the City after filing of this application.
Applicant Name Date - 1tQ t
Page 37
Tay Incremental Financing
�` •
Policy a dApplicationn
Please complete and submit the following information to the City of Oshkosh for a more detailed review of
the feasibility of your request for Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) assistance.The application is comprised of
five parts:
1. Applicant Information
2. Project/Property Information
3. Project Narrative
4. Project Budget/Financial Information
5. Buyer Certification and Acknowledgement.
Where there is not enough space for your response or additional information is requested, please use an
attachment. Use attachments only when necessary and to provide clarifying or additional information.
The Department of Community Development (DCD) reviews all applications for TIF assistance. Failure to
provide all required information in a complete and accurate manner could delay processing of your
application and DCD reserves the right to reject or halt processing the application for incomplete
submittals.
For further information please refer to the"City of Oshkosh Tax Incremental Financing Policy"document or
call the Economic Develo ment Division at 920,235.5055
Applicant • • •
Legal Name: Extreme Customs, LLC
Mailing Address. 3420 Jackson St Oshkosh WI 54901
Primary Contact 4: 866 680 7467 Cell #:
E-mail: tyler.reilly65)extremecustoms.com FAX#:
Attorney:
Legal Entity: Individual(s) Joint Tenants Tenants in Common
Corporation X LLC Partnership Other
If not a Wisconsin corporation/partnership/LLC, state where organized:
Will a new entity be created for ownership? Yes X No
Principals of existing or proposed corporation/partnership/LLC and extent of ownership interest.
Name: Address: Title: Interest:
Tyler Reilly 3420 Jackson St Oshkosh WI 54901 Managing member 100%
Is any owner, member, stockholder, partner, officer or director of any previously identified entities,
or any member of the immediate family of any such person, an employee of the City of
Oshkosh? Yes No X
If yes, give the name and relationship of the employee:
Have any of the applicants (including the principals of the corporation/partnership/LLC) ever
been charged or convicted of a misdemeanor or felony? Yes No X
If yes, please furnish details:
Page 38
• Tax Incremental Financing
Policy and Application
Overall Project Summary and Objectives:
We will purchase and renovate the existing JC Penny and Miles Kimbal retail buildings. Renovations include
extensive facade improvements, an interior reconfiguration to include a retail space, office space, an auto
shop, and warehousing space. We will being the site laterals into compliance in addition to aiding in the overall
site stormwater management.
Current and Proposed Uses:
Presently the two retail buildings sit vacant an unused on the site. We propose to operate a custom rims and
tires facility that does substantial online sales.
Description of End Users:
Extreme Customs is an existing business that has operated on Jackson St in Oshkosh for the past decade.
We sell custom rims and tires and associated products and services. Locally we provide installation of our
products. However, the majority of our revenue comes from online retail sales. Our team has expertise
with automotive products along with technology and marketing skill sets.
Property Summary: Describe any zoning changes that will be needed:
No zoning changes
Parcel/Land Area: 288.089 SF
Building Area: :. 60,485 SF
if of Dwelling Units: 0
# of Stories: 1
# of Parking Spaces:
Identify any other approvals, permits or licenses (i.e. Liquor License, Health Department, etc):
None
Describe briefly what the project will do for the property and neighborhood:
Renovation of the existing buildings will substantially improve the aesthetic appeal of the overall site.
The storm water management capabilities will improve the overall management of
the Stringham creek water shed.
Page 39
• Tax Incremental Financing
• Policy nd Application
m I
a
Project Timetable Date
Final Plan/Specification Preparation: May 2019
Bidding and Contracting May 2019
Firm Financing Approval: May 2019
Construction/Rehabilitation: June 2019 - Sept 2019
Landscaping/Site Work: June 2019 - Sept 2019
Occupancy/Lease Up: Oct 2019
Development Team
Developer: Tyler Reilly
Architect: Vision Architecture
Surveyor.
Contractor: CR Structures
Other Members:
Describe Team expertise and experience in developing similar projects:
Mr Reilly has operated his present location since 2011. CR Structures has significant experience
building and renovating commercial space.
Other current Team projects in development:
None
Financial ability of the applicant to complete the project:
Between the cash reserves, equity, and anticipated financing through Hometown Bank, Mr. Reilly
has the financial resources to complete the project.
History of use of other city or government financial incentives:
A part of this pro-'ect the Aviation plaza team has requested assistance through the WEDC Idle
ites Grant program
Professional Studies
Market Studies: Applications for commercial and residential projects may at the option
of the city be required to include a comprehensive market study. The market study
should identify target markets, analysis of competition, demographics, market rents,
letters of intent/inferest from prospective tenants, or for housing developments, sale
prices or rental rates of comparable properties.
Appraisal: All projects that involve the transfer of land may at the option of the city
include a recent appraisal. Projects that include land as a form of equity or collateral
must also submit a recent appraisal. The appraisal must value the property "as is", and
the impact on value must be considered for such items as demolition, environmental
remediation, relocation of utilities, lease buy-outs, and other work necessary to make
the site developable. The property must be valued assuming that the highest and
best use is the proposed use.
Page 40
• Tax Incremental Financing
Policy andApplication
Sources and Uses of Funds
Identify the sources of funds used to finance the project. Typical sources include equity,
lender financing, mezzanine financing, government financing, other anticipated types
of public assistance, and any other types or methods of financing.
Uses of Funds Amount ($) $ per SF of Building Area
Land Acquisition: $3,250,000
Demolition:
Environmental Remediation:
Site Clearance and Preparation:
Soft Costs/ Fees:
Soft Cost Contingency:
Hard Construction Costs: $2,106,896
Total Project Costs: $5,356,896
Sources of Funds % of total project costs
Equity
Developer Equity: $ %
Other 'Equity:( cash ) $ 900,000 17 %
Total Equity: $ 900,000 17 %
Loans Rate Term
Construction Financing: $ % mos. %
Permanent Financing: $ 4,240,059 5.25 % 20 yrs. 7,q %
TIF Assistance $ operationalize 0 %
Other: ( vvFnc: - isG j $ 216,837 4
Total Sources of Funds $5,356,896 100%
Financing
Source Amount Terms: Years/Interest Contact Information
Equity:
Loans 1 : Hometown Bank gate Kok nkok htbwi.com
2:
3:
4:
Page 41
• Tax Incremental Financing
Policy and Application
Filing Requirements
You must provide all of the following items with your signed application:
1. Fee: An application fee of 1%of the requested TIF assistance or$10,000,whichever is
greater.This fee is to cover City costs associated with evaluating the TIF application
and does not cover the use of outside consultants, which it required will he paid for
by-the applicant. Make your check payable to the City of Oshkosh.
2. Site Maps: Provide a map that shows the location of the site. Also provide a map
that focuses on the project and its immediate surroundings. Both maps should be no
larger than 11 x17 inches. Larger maps will be required for projects presented to the
Plan Commission, Redevelopment Authority, or Common Council.
3. Project Renderings: Provide preliminary architectural drawings,plans and renderings
for the project. These drawings should be no larger than 1 I xl 7 inches. Larger maps
will be required for projects presented to the Plan Commission, Redevelopment
Authority, or Cornmon Council.
Notes
• The City retains an administrative fee of 5% of the annual tax increment revenue.
• If the project requires planning and zoning approvals,you must make these applications
concurrent with this request.
Agreement
I, by signing this application, agree to the following:
1 . I have read and will abide by all the requirements of the City for Tax Incremental
Financing.
2. The information submitted is correct.
3. 1 agree to pay all costs involved in developing Project Plan or Development
Agreement. These costs may include, but not he limited to, bond counsel, outside
legal assistance,outside financial assistance, planning, engineering, etc, and all
costs involved in the issuance of the bonds or loans to finance the project.
4. 1 understand that the City reserves the right to deny final approval, regardless of
preliminary approval or the degree of construction completed before application
for final approval,
5. The undersigned authorizes the City of Oshkosh to check credit references and verify
financial and other information.
6. The undersigned also agrees to provide any additional information as may be
requested by the City after filing of this application.
Applicant Name Dated 119
Page 42
APPENDIX S
INVISTA
ANALYTICS
MINESHAFT OSHKOSH
MARKET STUDY and
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS REPORT
April 26, 2019
(Updated June 25, 2019)
Prepared Exclusively For:
Thomas Masters
Masters Oshkosh LLC
Prepared By:
Timothy M Hess, PhD
Invista Analytics, LLC
member of
A I
inf
AMERICAN STATISTICAL er
ASSOCIATION
Page 43
CONTENTS:
Introduction/Objective .........................................................................1
MarketStudy .........................................................................................2
Methodsand Data.............................................................................2
Results ..............................................................................................3
Overall Investment Analysis ................................................................3
Budgetand Funding ........................................................................3
TIF Payment Schedule......................................................................4
Operational Proforma ....................................................................6
Business Valuation on Reversion .................................................. 8
Return On Investment ..................................................................... 9
Page 44
INTRODUCTION /OBJECTIVE
Invista Analytics, LLC (IA) has been engaged to conduct a market study and investment analy-
sis for a proposed Mineshaft restaurant and family entertainment facility to be constructed with-
in the Aviation Plaza Center in Oshkosh, WI. The Mineshaft restaurant, under the ownership
of Thomas Masters, is a 25,000 square foot facility located in the downtown of Hartford, WI.
This facility offers approximately 14,400 square feet of restaurant and dining space, along with
approximately 5,500 square feet of game room and entertainment space and serves roughly
8,000- 10,000 guests per week.
Mr. Masters is proposing to open a second mineshaft location within the Aviation Plaza center.
This new facility, will be approximately 35,600 square feet, with roughly half of the space dedi-
cated to the dining and food service operations, and the other half dedicated to the game room
and entertainment space.
Plans call for the new facility to be located on the old Walmart site that was vacated in 2003.
Mr. Masters presently owns the site. However, the development of this site, has a fair number
of hindrances to include issues with storm water management, unstable soils, and non-con-
forming water and sewer laterals that are shared with neighboring parcels. In addition to the
site conditions,the financing for this project also poses some unique challenges. Total estimat-
ed investment needed to complete the project is$16.25 million. While the facility in Hartford
has a long history, obtaining financing for a new endeavor in a new market makes it such that
financial institutions are hesitant to borrow anything more that$8 million. This makes any addi-
tional site costs especially burdensome requiring the investment team to bring in a 50%equity
position.
Given the extraordinary costs associated with this site, Mr. Masters, along with the neighboring
parcel owners, have approached the City of Oshkosh about the possibility of utilizing Tax Incre-
ment Financing to make the redevelopment feasible. While the location of the proposed district
is outside the city's intended TIF focus of downtown and/or central city, staff has acknowledged
the existence of the extraordinary site conditions and noted that the redevelopment of this site
accomplishes a specific goal in the City Center Corridors Plan'. In addition, the department
of public works has requested that the stormwater plan address more capacity than might
be required of the Aviation Plaza site alone in an effort to aid in the overall Stringham Creek
watershed management. City staff invited the development team to present these findings to
the Oshkosh Common Council on February 12, 2019.At this public meeting members of the
council suggested that they would be willing to accept and review a formal TIF application for
consideration.
Given this ask for financial assistance, Invista Analytics has conducted significant quantitative
market research to determine the likely potential increment generated through a bayesian
transitional market factor analysis study. We then document the anticipated costs of the project
and potential increment generated.A discounted cash flow analysis is conducted to determine
a probable valuation of the business. Finally, return on investment metrics were calculated on
the with TIF and without TIF investment scenarios.
Figure 1-Overhead view of site and rendering of front entryway to proposed Mineshaft facility.
ve. .1
h y -
i ' u
I
1.
44
1.https://www.ci.oshkosh.wi.us/PlanningServices/Documents/DRAFTOshkoshCorridorsHQ.pdf page 29,accessed April 1,2019
MINESHAFT OSHKOSH INVESTMENT ANALYSIS 1
Page 45
MARKET STUDY SUMMARY
To determine the likely potential income to be generated by the proposed entertainment facility
we employed a bayesian transitional market factor analysis. The idea of this approach is to
utilize the market factors of both an existing location and the new location to predict the likely
impact of bringing a commercial operation into a new market. In this case, the original Mine-
shaft location in Hartford appears to have achieved maturity as evidenced by its fairly stabilized
revenue stream. Specifically over the past three years revenue growth has averaged 1.3%.
Thus applying this method, we anticipate finding the stabilized revenue of the new facility.
Methods and Data
To conduct the analysis Invista Analytics first acquired a relative performance index(RPI)data
set from FRANdata. The RPI is a semi-blinded metric in that the interpretation of each value is
the relative performance of each location relative to the performance of the average location.
The description of the franchise from which the data was sampled is as follows:
"National high-volume entertainment and dining venues offering customers fun upbeat
atmosphere with interactive video and gaming options for families while serving high quality
food and beverages"
The data set included 66 locations across 32 states. One of the locations contained in the data
set subsequently closed. Thus for the 65 remaining locations, IA staff collected the following
market factor variables.
Exponentiated Probability 50 Mile Population: For each location, concentric rings with 10 mile
radii were determined. Esri data was then used to determine the population within each ring.
These populations were then weighted using an exponential density function. This method
reflects the likelihood that potential customers are more likely to visit the closer they live and/or
work to a commercial enterprise. Figure 2 shows the concentric rings applied to the Oshkosh
and Hartford locations with shading representing the exponential weights.
Figure 2-Concentric 10 mile radius rings around existing Mineshaft location and proposed location in Aviation Plaza.
snawano -
nela �y
agoma
eye Green y
WsconslnV Plaresr^1 Kewaunee
PaPids Asnw ben
Nekoosa upaca o�
leton W
E
'Q° anito o �
adems Qy Exponential Weighting
ninon Radius Weight
Fond du L 0-10 mi 0.6076
nausta_n eboy 10-20 mi 0.2421
Wlsconain 20-30 ml 0.0965
Dells
30-40 ml 0.0385
Feedo burg Pona
aaaboo 40-50 ml 0.0153
9unP v Fesn
Madi n 0 ilw kee
Igevllle Flichburg 0 Waukesha
Point
Rac'
Janes
Kenosha
6eloit
Relative Retail Ranking: For each location, IA staff contacted either a community development
staff member of the municipality or the local economic development entity and asked them to
rate the location relative to other retail locations within their respective geographic regions on
a scale of 1 to 10,with 1 being the lowest or least desirable retail location, and 10 being the
highest or most desirable retail location.
Facility Size:Satelite imagery using Google Maps and/or Bing Maps with respective scales
were used to ascertain approximate facility footprint. Google street view, or Bing's Bird's Eye
views were used to determine if a facility might in fact have more than one floor, or if the facility
was co-located in a strip mall or other multi-tenant facility. In these cases, IA staff
2 INVISTA-ANALYTICS.COM
Page 46
conducted a brief phone interview with facility staff to ascertain approximate size of the facility.
In one case, the facility had apparently been closed since the RPI data set was assembled.
This record was thus dropped from the analysis data set.
Indirect/Direct Competitor Count(3 mile radius):The Google search engine was employed
using the search term"restaurants near<address>". Data was sorted by distance and a count
of the number of restaurants within 3 miles was recorded. Staff reviewed the list and identified
any facility that appeared to market substantial entertainment offerings that might include a
substantial gaming component. These facilities were recorded as direct competitors, while the
remaining restaurants were recorded as indirect competitors.
A subset of four facilities were randomly selected from the 65 usable records in the RPI data-
set. Two different staff members reviewed all 98 total restaurants located within 3 miles using
the Google search results and independently rated each facility as either a direct or indirect
competitor. We found an inter-rater reliability of 99%finding agreement on all but one facility.
We then used a bayesian quantile regression analysis to predict the log of the RPI metric given
the market factor variables utilizing the bayesQR Iibrary2 in the R statistical computing envi-
ronment version 3.5.3. Our model allowed for up to 3 way interactions. The pior mean vector
of parameters were all set to zero. We employed 1,000 burn-in iterations and 10,000 MCMC
runs. The expected value of the posterior distributions of the model parameters were then used
along with the market factor data from both the Hartford and Oshkosh locations to predict the
RPI for each location.
Results
The resultant predicted RPI values were 1.131 for the Hartford facility and 1.942 for the
Oshkosh facility. Given the Hartford location had a total revenue of$6.061 million dollars, the
bayesian estimation would suggest the Oshkosh location would achieve$10.407 million dollars
in revenue after maturity and achieving full market penetration. To assess the potential range
of variability of potential revenue, we conducted 1,000 simulations bootstrapping the RPI data
locations with replacement. For each simulation we proceeded as before with the bayesian
quantile estimation only using 100 burn-in iterations and 1,000 MCMC runs.A95% prediction
interval for the revenue ranged from$7.25 million dollars up to$13.22 million dollars.
For context,the average revenue per store for Dave and Buster's Entertainment this past
year reported in their April 2, 2019 annual report to the SEC was$10.457 million3 whereas the
average for a Chuck E Cheese franchise location was$1.167 million^.Additionally, underwrit-
ers with a local bank independently arrived at revenue threshold intervals of$8, $10, and$12
million when considering potentially financing the projects.
OVERALL INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
Budget and Funding
We first consider the detailed budget and sources of income. The table on the next page lists
all expected expenses. Specifically we have identified$1,934,994 total expenses related to site
improvement costs including storm water management with additional capacity requested by
the city's department of public works, water and sewer laterals, costs associated with poor soil
conditions, and curb and gutter and driveway aprons. The total development costs identified
surpass$16.1 million.
On the funding side, we note that the proposed project brings its own unique challenges. While
several financial institutions have committed to financing the project, all of them have set their
limits at approximately$8 million.At present, BMO Harris bank has committed to financing $8
million during the construction phase so long as WBD commits to financing$4 million through
the SBA 504 program upon completion of the project leaving each with$4 million in loan com-
mitments. Several bankers have noted that this is likely one of the largest, privately financed
new market restaurant/entertainment facilities being opened in Wisconsin. Given this limitation
in financing, the extra site improvement costs become especially cumbersome.
2.D Benoit,D Van den Poel 'bayesQR:A Bayesian Approach to Quantile Regression'J.Stat Software 76(7),2017
3.http://ir.daveandbusters.com/annual-reports Annual Report dated April 2,2019 page 31.Accessed April 18,2019
4.https://cecentertainment.gcs-web.com/sec-filings Annual Report dated April 8,2019 page 25.Accessed April 18,2019
5.Personal conversation with loan officer on April 19,2019
MINESHAFT OSHKOSH INVESTMENT ANALYSIS 3
Page 47
Detailed Project Budget
Amount Notes
Acquisition&Site Pre
Land Acquisition 3,250,000
Subtotal $3,250,000
Soft Costs Fees
Developer Fee(5%) 610,348
Appraisal 5,000
Professional Services 32,000
Insurance 6,000 Construction Insurance
Building Permit In Keller Bid
Mortgage Fees 30,000 BMO&WBD Fees
Construction Interest 134,167 10 Build-loan @ 4.75 for 6 mo
Marketing 35,000
Real Estate Taxes 56,193 Jan-20
Contingency 140,000
Subtotal $1,048,707
Hard Costs
Building 8,238,760 Keller($1,934,994 site/TIF Eligible)
Kitchen Equipment 750,000 Edward Don
Bar Equip/Dishes 100,000
Furniture 400,000
Electronics/Networking/AV 112,000
Start up Inventory 200,000
Decorating 150,000
Signage 300,000
Gaming Equipment 1,700,805 Drouillard Int Sales
Subtotal $11,951,565
Total Project Costs $16,250,272
Source of Funding
Permanent Financing 8,000,000 BMO&WBD
Land&Equity 3,860,348
WEDC Idle Sites Grant 210,086
TIF Monetization 1,124,478
Other Cash Funds 3,055,360 cash from developers)
Total Source of Funds 16,250,272
The investment team is contributing the land and the development fee as equity. Further, the
city has applied for an Idle Sites Grant through the Wisconsin Economic Development Cor-
porationration to help offset the site improvement costs across the entire aviation plaza site.
While the total grant award might be$500,000, the three individual owners have agreed to al-
locate the proceeds roughly in proportion to the amount of eligible costs each owner will have.
The Mineshaft team anticipates$210,086 in proceeds from the WEDC grant.
The development team anticipated bringing roughly$3 million in cash to the project. The devel-
oper is seeking $1.124 million in development assistance, of which the details of payback will
be discussed in the next section.
TIF Payment Schedule
Invista staff has met with the city assessor on several occations to discuss the present and
future assessed values of the proposed Minshaft and other Aviation Plaza parcels. The base
assessed value of the site as it sits today is$2,275,000. The new building is likely to add an
additional$201.50 of value per square foot.At 35,600 square feet, we anticipate that the over-
all site assessment will increase$7.175 million to a total assessed value of$9,450,000.
The development incentive payback schedule appears on the following page. We anticipate
that approximately$3.225 million of increment will be added to the site by January 1, 2020,
4 INVISTA-ANALYTICS.COM
Page 48
m m � ry ry � m o n ry m
o ry ry m
n ry
m N
a w m w m w w m o
ry m m ry m m m m a
m w ry m
N N o3
a "
y a �n o n ry m
m
.� m �o m m a
en m
c
m ry m v m o .�
j,� z O o 0 0 o"- "ow "o, "ow 0 0 0
N N
a
E on ry ry m
o
m N
aN N N N N N N N N
� aaaaaaaa � �o
� m m
en o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� .�
o v v v v v v v v v
0 0
o -
3 o o o o o o o o o o o
.a LL o o o o o o o o o o o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o u
F c co
E m o N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t m m m m m m m m m
m m m o m m m o o m m
x
° vry
� o ry
c m -
° .� ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry
m
� 0 5
O O O O O O O O O O O o f
p \ ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry ry 3 d
� z
o o o W o o o o o o o o o o o °
o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o O ry a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c ry v w ry N N N N N N N N N N Z i
O
Eo
n n n
o o o o o o o o o o o G v
Q o o 0 0 0 o o o o o o
o 0 0 0 c c 0 0 0 0 0 a
F O O O O O O O O O O O E
L T o
W V V V V V V V V V V
L �_ -
0
X o w -
W O O a 3
L d W O N m. V vt w W m o
C 1 W K G O O O O O O N O O O O
.
F V - O
m o -
c
while the full project will be completed by April 2020 such that the full increment will be as-
sessed January 1, 2021.
MINESHAFT OSHKOSH INVESTMENT ANALYSIS 5
Page 49
We calculate the increment available to pay back the note as 90%of the increment generated.
Further, we allocate$4,000 annually for the city for administrative expenses. The remaining
increment we propose be allocated to the Rogan's TIF payback(labeled as'Inc to Rogans' in
table).Assuming a 5.25% interest rate on the municipal revenue obligation note, we find the
increment generated is sufficient to pay back the note in 10 years.
Operational Proforma
The operational proforma, both with and without TIF assistance can be found on the following
two pages.As noted previously, the estimation method predicted an 'as stabilized' revenue of
the new location of$10,407,000.We anticipate this taking 3 years to achieve full market pene-
tration. We anticipate 70%of the full revenue in year 1 and 90% in year 2. We used the relative
proportion of revenues seen in the Hartford facility, that being food and beverage accounting
for 75%of the total revenue while the game room comprising approximately 25%of revenue.
After year 3 we assume a 1.3%annual increase in revenues as seen in the Hartford facility.
For cost of goods sold we used the ratio of cost to revenue found at the Hartford facility. We
note the food and beverage cost are slightly higher than industry averages. This is consistent,
however, with the strategic plan to offer low priced food to bring customers in knowing that the
majority of profitability comes from the gaming operations.
The operating expenses were estimated from actual bids, direct calculations with known rates,
or approximate estimates based off of expenses realized at the Hartford location. One expense
that might be materially different is the advertising expense. Mr Masters has expressed the de-
sire to substantially increase the marketing budget for the new operation in an effort to achieve
market penetration and stabilization. To achieve this, the new operation is proposing a budget
of$400K annually, which is 3.8%of revenue. While this is a meaningful increase from the
3.3% presently spent at the Hartford location, in part this can be attributed to the fact that the
operation has already achieved market penetration and maturity. For comparison, Dave and
Busters reports a 3.2%expenditures while Chuck E Cheese reports advertising expenditures of
5.3%of revenue7.
The City of Oshkosh TIF policy and application suggests that in the case of Owner-Occupied
Commercial projects that the analysis of financial need be based on the company's minimum
threshold needed. Through further discussions with city staff, it was determined that this
benchmark is rather arbitrary. Rather we will attempt to frame the need based on a 10-year
Internal Rate of Return (IRR). In the case of residential or commercial development where the
intended approach is to lease out the project, the IRR accurately reflects the return on the pas-
sive investment. In this case, given the owner intends to operate an active business, the IRR
calculation will reflect both the return on the initial investment of money to start the business,
but also the return on the owner's efforts to operate the business. One approach to accurately
reflect just the return on initial investment is to agree upon a compensation for the owner's
efforts in operating the business. Proceeding forward, we will count this as an expense to the
business for the IRR calculation. We anticipate Mr Masters, and his partner,William Masters,
each spend roughly 75%effort, or 1.5 total FTE operating this new endeavor. In return, they
will be paid 1.7%of the total revenue as a salary. The first year this would work out to a total
annual 1.0 FTE salary of$82,562 and increasing to$117,946 by year 3 once the operation has
achieved operational maturity.
In general, unless based off a direct calculation, it is assumed that operational expenses will in-
crease by 1%annually. Note year 5 we anticipate an additional expense in accounting to assist
in the likely look-back clause we anticipate to be included in the development agreement with
the city.
We assume the primary financing will be subject to a 5.25% interest rate amortized over 20
years. Further, our experience with lending institutions is that they prefer an amortization
schedule to start immediately upon delivery of the TIF note funds despite the likelihood that the
TIF district not produce any increment till year two or later. Thus for the TIF monetization we
assume a straight 10 year amortization again with a 5.25% interest rate.
6.http://ir.daveandbusters.com/annual-reports Annual Report dated April 2,2019 page 9.Accessed April 18,2019
7.https://cecentertainment.gcs-web.com/sec-filings Annual Report dated April 8,2019 page 33.Accessed April 18,2019
6 INVISTA-ANALYTICS.COM
Page 50
m � m
vl - m o -
'
o a o v w a n .�+ `� o v m
i° v v r�i r�i o m a a m o a
a a r� v o Ir"i v o .+ a oo n c
vi r7 vN n rri v m r1 � oc �r1 v m
i vri m a
.min v
i° ooM 0 M N 16 cri y v m a
ww w o Nm of rvi o 0
16 16
16 w r1 v v
.min vle
o
i° v w oo w v NN n o0
^ v^i m m o °S of n ry 6 i v m
`N m m v m o0 o v w m
`m ma w wv�i o o N v vw
w vwo n nNg �o o vo ow
o V a r6 v v 16 o v
o
3
oo n v v v o
m r-i o o v w o v v v a r�i m n
i m e w v 16o r�i 16 16 a i.16 6 a rmi oo a r�i 16v o0
° a_ N^o .min v .n.n"^.X.`"n .n .n.nm
r aW o 0o v�i v v a r�i n m w o m ^ n o0
° `m m n v n n w v n m a a N n w °'m
i o v N v v om O1 a ' ai on
o ri v 'O V mN m n.11 .n.11 a
a 8 yy
voi O w v N N v m O V V voi V N NN n c n a v o N a oo v w n o0
i o o w m a im 1O .�+ 1O v v ry v N v o
16
a
m y N v o 'N" v v w m N w1w n
oN ry o O1 N v i. om a
n 8 o 2 m m
} v w o m w I o v.I w v o'^.i..N"�' N N ry a vmi
.n N `�.ai "n
v
o
oo a°
'n o o '^
y m y 0 — @J
a°
-O 'oo 03 o m � a N m z
z � o N y w _ s ��a a ZL c @� _
m N m o x N � _ otf u'�
F m o a _ - L °^
o
o
w ob 17 v on E u N m 0 w v x '^ u ° ° _' a >u J o u o. n
c o E o `o 0 1p o ° - > E ,� o 'a - o o z E LL O O O u
-o l'/ l7 O - m v H 0 0. c a � � ¢ LL l'/ l'/ � G
L—Lz u O lD z lD r Z u 0 F F i
For the without TIF scenario the only change is that TIF recapture and TIF note debt service is
removed from the bottom two lines.
The net cash flow upon stabilization at year 3 start is roughly$921K and$903K in the TIF and
without TIF scenarios respectively, and increase steadily to roughly$1,178K and$1,155K by
year 10. During the subsequent years the difference between the 2 projections is roughly$17K
that results from the disparity in how the bank finances the TIF note verses how it is likely paid
out through the TIF funding mechanism.
MINESHAFT OSHKOSH INVESTMENT ANALYSIS 7
Page 51
m m ao o n a o� ry o o N
o N m
m N L/1 O N n N 0 L/1 o� h O T 0 tR O m o� N W tD N V W o� m n N W m
vV'n N W O h n r-i h V'h c6 N NC
T m . 1 m . O mm
h V N Vl Vl Vl m M Vl Vl V h .ai W ry T
,n ,n ,n
o n o N o a rD W V V N V O V V O W O N
o n ro m N .� o o m m m .� ^ m ry m a N N N ry m
m m o m�n m a ry o o N v n m io m m n
W N N N o m tND h O m I O O m NIli Ili N tD O 00 N N I
m a m vrvi a N +n +n+n +n+n a v"'i o I
T tD 00 T O M N M vrvt O W V m N V h N V V O n W O
t�D 1. O N W O m m o W m o W N tD O m m V W W m rD m W n
W V W N v�l W vmt O m W N v1 O m h 0 n a N o m m N o ", 'IN
Y
o n
vmi ry � � Le +n+n +n+n ti
�vi
1! N T N N N m o W N O O T O 1 m N O
vl V O V o rD m N O N O N O O t�D O �/ m o T 00'o a o� of rc n m o m o n o �n w w m v n m a
w vmi o rc ni v m a m m N m m o m 10 o ai ai N n m "Im
a aa
M W .Ni V t^D M O N Vl V h h h V M Vl Vl T n O
I. ry O m a w a m w w o o .� w �n o m m m m m o w m n m w o
m m m v o 00 h O V 8 T W m O T m m
ry m w n m a ao v �o 0 0 0� o� �n n v v o ro a o�ao
W N Mf 00 n o I V 'M o o m W-i o tD N vV'vt N rD rl
' m o o D m m o m vry v w v� ^ n n o m n n m N 4 8
-
�vi
ro m w N w a w o n n o �n o ,� ry o �n o� ro a o ro
N O m W o w I W N O �/1 W T m O n N m
` n m N o ao a ry v v �n m m ry m m y N va m ry m m
Y to 0 v^t V N N N o W M V h16 o m N o N W vmt O mN N V O
n m m m vrvi a ,� ,n ,n,n ,n,n ao ro w O
a � ,n,n ,n,n � ,n ,n ,n a - -
3
�n w n m o o m O n v o� �n o� o io a m v o N
0 o m rD m m m m N T N T O W W W N m .mi T N
Lri m a m e m o a N o m m o v es n .� ry o v v v a N m m a
9 Y 'W wm Oi M N o M W vt tD O h M W tD m N N 'O
moo -O m m ro m m m ,n m ry o ry I a N
O T.11 m N O Vl h h h h h N m
.Q
w N o ,n,n ,n
a aa
L O w m T �1 V ^ �aaD N n o w m n m O vet w o vet vmt t D t�D o W n ^ W 1 n o N
0 ` n h V T IN n to V h tD O N m O m n O N n W rD
W16 L6 N o o N m c6 N N c6 N W m L6 o h ri O O m N n
m "' ry m m ,n °.�' o N m o m
W m o o
w ry n 0 N a n v o m ry m n ry m m o I ry v o� �n vi ao a o�m
y �: o N urvl'N m v1 N W to N O V tD o T O O N Mf
o o o o m O O h m V h W N o N n n V O
o� io a N ,`"n
ti
vmi� vL6i
N �/1 O n N m O O h �/1 o o o o V o o 0 0 o o m o m o o o o
h 0 m O T om rD W W V O N h o I o o V N V "1 I I V T
Ln m .� o w ao a o o N o ry m v n ry v o ry N v `.�° v ao ry m n
w a 'ro o m a w N ry v m I o I w ' o o m rv 'N
ry V I W w m O N O �/1 V h �/1 W o N m V �/ O 00 V.i
O m m o� vl N n � h V N h h h o N Vl Vl N m w IN
ry ai ,n m ,n
ICI
o o o o N O O O O h n W o o o o o m o o pip T o o o
N tND m N O O O V �/1 O 0 o ry o o o o o n n O W T T
tD o o w �n o m o o �n m , o o o o v m o
v ry ry m m ^ v°di ry o ry o 0 o ry mn mn 2 °° ry `°m
ii ,n ,n rri ±n
E
o
7 o
o �
on " E 2E E
° op o
Vo V W _
° o N Y Q c
m 3 m N 3 -
E
N $ N o X v N YoE
w _
w o6 4 W 90 ° X o w p
W K a 0V oL E V N Q c m -?O ? Q — v V
° l7 l7 0 ° m K H l9 O. c K O ¢ u ¢ ¢ m O K u l7 m 2 O u p O - W
K V Z V Z
Business Valuation on Reversion
In order to calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR)we first need to calculate an assumed
reversion at the end of year ten. We performed a 6 year discounted cash flow method with a 20
year residual valuation. It is typical when conducting a valuation on a business to do so based
off of projected future revenues after income taxes. Thus we adjust the net operating income
from year 11 to include depreciation and interest expenses so that an estimate of income taxes
can be calculated. We assume a straight line depreciation of 39 years on the building. The
technology, furniture, and food prep equipment have a 5 year depreciation and so will have
already been taken.
8 INVISTA-ANALYTICS.COM
Page 52
Discounted Cash Flow Business Valuation
Year R+1 Year R+2 Year R+3 Year R+4 Year R+5 Year R+6
Growth Rate 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%
Net Operating Income $1,867,756 $1,908,847 $1,950,841 $1,993,760 $2,037,623 $2,082,450
Other Expenses
Depreciation and Amortization Expense (205,128) (205,128) (205,128) (205,128) (205,128) (205,128)
Interest Expense (254,426) (233,319) (211,076) (187,637) (162,938) (136,910)
(459,554) (438,447) (416,204) (392,765) (368,066) (342,038)
Pre-Tax Net Income 1,408,202 1,470,400 1,534,637 1,600,995 1,669,557 1,740,413
Income Taxes(21%Fed,7.9%State) (406,970) (424,946) (443,510) (462,688) (482,502) (502,979)
After-Tax Net Income 1,001,232 1,045,454 1,091,127 1,138,307 1,187,055 1,237,433
Adjustments to Determine Cash Flow
Depreciation and Amortization Expense 205,128 205,128 205,128 205,128 205,128 205,128
Change in Debt 392,464 413,572 435,814 459,253 483,953 509,981
Net Cash Flowto Equity 1,598,824 1,664,154 1,732,070 1,802,689 1,876,136 1,952,542
Present value factor(@12.5%) 0.8889 0.7901 0.7023 0.6243 0.5549 0.4933
Present Value Net Cash Flow $1,421,177 $1,314,887 $1,216,488 $1,125,410 $1,041,122 $963,131
Residual Value
Summary Cash Flow 1,952,542
Sum of PV Net Cash Flows $7,082,215 A CF Growth rate 4%
Residual Value $8,298,304 Direct Resid Factor(20 yr) 4.25
Indicated Value $15,380,519 $8,298,304
We assume the new corporate tax rate of 21%for federal and 7.9%for state income taxes.
Typically, unless a company is publicly traded, the discount rate, or the return a prospective
buyer anticipates is likely to be within the 10 to 25% range. Starting at the minimum, of 10%
and then adding premiums for a small business and the risk associated with running a restau-
rant, a 12.5%Weighted Average Cost of Capital would seem to be a conservative estimate for
use resulting in possibly an over estimate of value. Proceeding across time, we use the growth
rate from year 10 to year 11 of 2.2% in NOI.
We employed a direct 20 year residual valuation using the 4%growth rate in net cash flow to
equity. The formula for the Direct Residual Factor at 20 years is given by
20
1.04'
DRF=
I=11.125i+6
i=1
which resulted in a direct residual factor of 4.25. The sum of the present values of the cash
flows totaled$7,082,215, while the residual value totaled $8,298,304, resulting in a total indi-
cated value of$15,380,519.
Return on Investment
Assuming that the aviation plaza group is awarded the idle sites grant through the WEDC, and
that the city council and joint review board would approve the TIF incentive, the development
team would need to contribute in cash and equity$6,915,708 to finish the project. If TIF were
not used, the team would have to contribute$8,040,186.
There exists an approximately 20,000 square foot building on the parcel owned by the devel-
opment team that is split into two units. The team plans to use the 11,500 square foot space
to serve as a support facility for the Mineshaft operations. We assume that after the site gets
substantially redeveloped, the remaining 8,500 square foot unit could be partitioned and sold.
The assessor has valued the building at$800K as it sits today. We assume a sale with$500K
in proceeds at the end of year 1.
We assume a 5%commission on a business broker. Further, at the end of year 10,the$8 mil-
lion note would still have$5,024,390 left in principal to pay off. Thus after the sale the develop-
ment team would stand to get$9,587,103 in proceeds on the sale of the business. Including
MINESHAFT OSHKOSH INVESTMENT ANALYSIS 9
Page 53
Return on Investment Metrics
With TIF Without TIF
Net Cash Flow Reversion Total Net Cash Flow Reversion Total
Initial Cash Outlay -6,915,708 -6,915,708 -8,040,186 -8,040,186
Year 1 53,126 500,000 553,126 197,906 500,000 697,906
Year 2 640,840 640,840 712,750 712,750
Year 3 920,821 920,821 903,479 903,479
Year 954,993 954,993 937,651 937,651
Year 5 987,768 987,768 970,426 970,426
Year 6 1,025,158 1,025,158 1,007,816 1,007,816
Year 7 1,061,173 1,061,173 1,043,831 1,043,831
Year 8 1,097,823 1,097,823 1,080,481 1,080,481
Year 9 1,135,120 1,135,120 1,117,778 1,117,778
Year 10 1,173,074 9,587,103 10,760,177 1,155,732 9,587,103 10,742,835
Business Valuation 15,380,519 15,380,519
Broker Commission 769,026 769,026
Mortgage Payoff 5,024,390 5,024,390
Net Reversion 9,587,103 9,587,103
10yr IRR=> 14.69% 10yr IRR=> 12.44%
this amount in the year 10 reversion results in a 10 year internal rate of return of 14.69%with
the proposed TIF assistance, and 12.44%without TIF assistance.
Given the relatively high equity position required to complete this project in addition to the
overall risk associated with a restaurant and entertainment facility, it would seem reasonable
to require a rate of return higher than 12.44% in this case before proceeding with the proj-
ect. Maybe more importantly from the developers' perspective than the rate of return, is the
lowering of the extreme amount of cash required to implement this project. Our opinion would
be that these two factors, in combination, are sufficient to make the'but for'finding required for
TIF assistance.
10 INVISTA-ANALYTICS.COM
Page 54
DISCLAIMER
The findings presented herein are based upon the information available and received at
the time this report was compiled. Invista Analytics(IA) has taken every possible precau-
tion to evaluate this information for its completeness, accuracy and reliability. To the best
of its knowledge, IA feels the information and conclusions presented herein are sound and
reliable.
It should also be understood that normal economic and marketplace conditions change con-
stantly. IA assumes no responsibility for information that becomes outdated once this report
is written; nor is it responsible for keeping this information current after June 25, 2019.
The results presented in this report are the professional opinion of IA and are based on the
information available at this time. These opinions infer proper and professional management
of the business operation. The opinions also infer that market conditions do not change the
information received upon which these opinions are based. IA assumes no responsibility for
changes in market conditions.
Furthermore, it is assumed that the reader of this report completely understands its contents,
assumptions and recommendations. If the reader does not fully understand the contents
contained herein, clarification should be sought from Invista Analytics.
Finally, IA assumes no responsibility should the management of the proposed business ven-
ture deviate from any recommendations that may have been provided in this report.
Any further questions about this report should be directed to IA.
Sincerely,
�g� V
Timothy Hess, PhD
INVISTA
ANALYTICS
240 Algoma Blvd-Suite A
Oshkosh,WI 54901
920.203.2177
www.invista-analytics.com
11 INVISTA-ANALYTICS.COM
Page 55
I NVI STA
ANALYTICS
Page 56
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES
July 2, 2019
PRESENT: Lynnsey Erickson, Thomas Fojtik, Michael Ford, Derek Groth,John Hinz, John
Kiefer, Justin Mitchell, Thomas Perry, Kathleen Propp
EXCUSED: Lori Palmeri
STAFF: Mark Lyons, Planning Services Manager; Justin Gierach, Engineering Division
Manager/City Engineer; Kelly Nieforth, Economic Development Services Manager;
Jeff Nau, Associate Planner;Brian Slusarek, Assistant Planner; Steven Wiley,
Assistant Planner;Mina Kuss, Recording Secretary
Chairperson Fojtik called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm. Roll call was taken and a quorum
declared present.
The minutes of June 18, 2019 were approved as presented. (Hinz/Kiefer)
VI. PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED CREATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 37 AVIATION PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; DESIGNATION
OF BOUNDARIES AND APPROVAL OF PROJECT PLAN
Site Inspections Report: Mr. Fojtik and Mr. Hinz reported visiting the site.
Staff report accepted as part of the record.
Tax Incremental District No. 37(the "TID" or "District")is a proposed 27 acre in need of
rehabilitation or conservation district located in the vicinity of the W. South Park Ave. and S.
Koeller Street and abutting Interstate 41. The proposed district is comprised of five parcels owned
by the applicants and contain approximately 117,000 sq. ft. of retail space with Rogan s Shoes as
the only current occupant following the closure of the J.C. Penny Store in 2015. The former
Walmart store was demolished in 2007.
Mr. Lyons presented the item and discussed the purpose of the proposed TID creation. The City
anticipates making total expenditures of approximately$4.84 million to undertake project
identified in the Project Plan. Project costs include an estimated$1.89 million in "pay as you go"
development incentives (principal and interest), $2.75 million for additional public infrastructure
improvements and an estimated$200,000 in administrative costs. The City is projecting that new
land and improvements value of approximately$12.4 million will result from redevelopment
activity within the District. The "expected"improvements will occur on the five parcels located in
the district. The developers are proposing a mixture of commercial and office uses. The
developments are Extreme Customs, Mineshaft and Rogan s Shoes. The developers are
anticipating being able to fully develop the district by sometime in 2020. The proposed Plan is in
Plan Commission Minutes July 2,2019
Page 57
general conformance with the City of Oshkosh's Comprehensive and the City Center Corridor
Plan for South Park Avenue.
Mr. Fojtik opened up technical questions to staff.
Mr. Hinz asked if the TIF would include any potential developments on the east side of the
property.
Mr. Lyons explained the TID does account for full reconstruction of the entire area. He said the
storm water and utilities are being accounted for if outlot development should take place. He said
the storm water management plan is already being sized to be able to accommodate that. He
stated they are trying to be forward thinking in this TID.
Mr. Fojtik asked Mr. Lyons to talk about the aviation component of the project and how it limits
developments.
Mr. Lyons showed the area of the Airport Zoning Overlay which covers most of the proposed area.
He explained the overlay does not permit anything that is deemed an assembly use(hotel,
restaurant, etc.).
Mr. Fojtik commented any place a plane may crash.
Mr. Lyons replied correct.
Mr. Mitchell said it states that part of the basis for the request is that city does not have funds
available to pay for the cost to rehabilitate the public infrastructure. He asked if the city did not
maintain or have a revenue source for updating its' own public infrastructure.
Mr. Lyons explained the public infrastructure is on the private side. He said the Public Service
Commission(PSC)requires an independent waterline to each building.
Ms. Nieforth clarified the city's water main is in the right-of-way. She reiterated that PSC requires
a private parcel owner to have a lateral off of the city's water main to their site. She explained that
is where the city does not have funds, to connect off the water main into the site.
Mr. Mitchell said it states public infrastructure but it is really privately owned.
Todd Taves (Senior Municipal Advisor, Ehlers), said the site has been sitting idle for an extended
period of time. He explained the things that have to be done to allow for this site to develop is
costly and reconstructing always costs more. He stated it has been determined that to make the
project economically viable for the property owners/developers,using the TIF money to address
the site conditions that are in impairment is necessary for the site to move forward. He stated it is
a combination of the utility cost but also private and public costs in order to make the site
attractive.
Plan Commission Minutes July 2,2019
Page 58
Mr. Ford asked for confirmation that the Mineshaft would cost$16 million but could only get$8
million from the bank. He asked if the Mineshaft would have to put up the rest of the money
themselves without the TIF district.
Ms. Nieforth said the city made an effort, applied for a WDC grant and was granted$500,000. She
said they are trying to lower the TIF assistance amount. She explained the applicants are asking
for TIF assistance for under ten years which is a goal that Council does have in the TIF policy. She
stated the applicants are trying to meet all the goals that Council has set forth.
Mr. Ford asked if there is any type of sensitivity analysis. He said just looking at the revenues,
they have a 10 million dollar stream with a range of$7 to$13 million. He said he is just curious if
there is anything the city looks at with what the impact would be if it were on the lower end of the
range.
Mr. Taves replied one of the techniques that the city has used is the concept of pay as you go. He
explained rather than the city fronting the money, the developers provide the money and would be
reimbursed. He said the impact if there was less value is that the developer would be reimbursed
for a longer time which would increase the life of the district. He said it would not cost the city to
be out any funds. He said the other thing it would do is to the extent that there are additional
infrastructure needs down the road, which is being shown as being cash funded out of the TID
after the reimbursements are made to the developer, it would either reduce or delay the ability of
the city to access those monies for those types of projects.
Mr. Ford said the main risk to him from a land use decision is that this is for a 35,000 sq. ft.
building they are funding via this TIF. He questioned what would happen if the business was not
successful.
Ms. Nieforth replied if the building went out of business in two years, the city would still have an
updated public infrastructure installed already, laterals installed to each site that would meet code
and a storm water facility that would help with the Stringham Creek watershed area. She said
there would still be some value to the site though it would not be at its fullest potential but the city
could still capture increment to fulfil TIF obligations.
Mr. Mitchell said it is his first time going through one of these. He said during his research,he
found that TIFs can create a shadow fund. He asked what kind of oversight does the city have and
who determines the distribution.
Mr. Taves replied when the city creates a Tax Increment District, it has to create a special fund
typically a special revenue fund. He explained more about the special revenue fund. He said the
city's financial statements are audited annually to include those in the Tax Increment Districts. He
stated there is also a Joint Review Board involved in this process consisting of members from each
taxing jurisdictions. He said one of the requirements for the TIF statue is that a report must be
filed annually with the Department of Revenue that accounts for all the revenues and
expenditures. The Joint Review Board also meets annually to review the reports for each of the
outstanding Tax Increment Districts of the city.
Plan Commission Minutes July 2,2019
Page 59
Mr. Mitchell asked who outlines what the funds are used for.
Mr. Taves explained the plan is intended to be the framework for making expenditures but the fact
that it is in a Tax Increment District does not change what the Council would otherwise be
required to approve. He said all the expenditures go through the same process as any other city
expenditure.
Mr. Fojtik opened up the public hearing.
Jason White, 1204 Fairfax Street, said he is with GOEDC and sent a letter this afternoon. He stated
the letter confirms support of the TID. He explained how he got directly involved when he met
Tyler from Extreme Customs in 2018 and helped identify a new location for Extreme Customs. He
explained the process of planning and getting the approval through the city for the site. He
believes the TIF needs to go hand in hand with the developments. He said the costs Tyler would
incur to stay at the site with aging infrastructure is not possible for them to finance without the
TIF. He stated they do believe this does enhance the corridor and improves the city as a whole.
He reiterated this cannot happen without the Tax Increment District.
Tom Masters, 22 N. Main Street in Hartford, said he is the owner of the Mineshaft in Hartford and
also owns The Fox and Hound in the Holy Hill area. He wanted to address the viability of the
restaurant. He said he has been at the Mineshaft for 44 years. He stated they have never had a bad
year or a slow year. He explained it is not a bar or club and the entertainment area is a gaming
area. He stated he has been at the other restaurant for 17 years and both his restaurants are doing
really good.
Tim Hess, 2645 Templeton Place, said he was involved in some of the analytics portions. He said
the range of$7 to$13 million does mean there is substantial risks. He said they are trying to make
it so the developers do not have to bring in a huge amount of money which is hard to do when it is
this sort of facility. He pointed out the owners of the properties and a contractor are present to
answer any questions.
Mr. Fojtik closed the public hearing.
Motion by Kiefer to adopt the findings and recommendation as stated in the staff report.
Seconded by Perry.
Mr. Fojtik asked if there was any discussion about the motion.
Mr. Mitchell stated it lists there are 4.6 million dollars for public infrastructure overall. He asked
what percent of public infrastructure is being paid for by the city.
Mr. Lyons replied the public infrastructure cost is$2.75 million which is public infrastructure cost
after development incentives have been paid to the developer.
Plan Commission Minutes July 2,2019
Page 60
Mr. Mitchell explained where he was adding his numbers from. He said he is trying to understand
the total infrastructure cost and how much the city is paying for.
Ms. Nieforth said it almost has to be broken up into two. She explained there are items the
developers have to do to get the development ready which will be in the cash flow sheet. She said
those costs will be taken care of at the beginning and then there are other cost the city has
identified such as certain public infrastructure cost that benefit the district. She explained the TIF
money cant be used for other projects that would not benefit the district directly. She reiterated
the$2.75 million is the cost after the TIF assistance obligation is complete. She said they made sure
there are adequate funds for the Stringham Creek watershed issues and connecting the district to
other areas on the west side of 41.
Mr. Mitchell said his understanding is that financial support is very important in providing for
these public infrastructures just like in residential areas. He asked if the city is paying for all the
public infrastructure or if they are sharing the cost with the property owners.
Ms. Nieforth replied there are some costs that are identified on the site that are required to get the
site in compliance that the city did not include in the TIF plan. She said the owners will be
required to pay those costs. She reiterated this is a pay as you go and the developers would pay
for the cost up front. She stated there are costs that would be paid by the property owners that
would not be TIF funded.
Mr. Mitchell asked for a rough estimate of percentage the city is paying for regarding the public
infrastructure.
Ms. Nieforth said without looking at the numbers that they did not include in the TIF plan, she
would not feel comfortable giving a percentage. She stated there is a substantial amount that was
not included.
Mr. Lyons commented the developers are trying to stay under ten year which is a benchmark set
by Council. He explained when Council looks at TIFs, they really like things that cash flow under
ten years. He said the applicant, in looking at the numbers, only asked enough to stay under that
ten year window.
Ms. Nieforth asked Mr. Hess what the total TIF request was to the total investment.
Mr. Hess replied$1.7 million is 7.4%of the overall investment.
Mr. Ford said he wants to ensure that Plan Commission is doing its due diligence and thanked
staff for answering his questions.
Ms. Nieforth said it is something the city does when it is working the Ehlers. She said there is a
market analysis that the city requires as part of the submittal to ensure the city can meet the TIF
obligations should something happen.
Plan Commission Minutes July 2,2019
Page 61
Mr. Hinz said typically Oshkosh has not been friendly to restaurants that wants TIFs. He said
there have been two that have come through with multi-use developments. He stated the
Mineshaft is going to dominate this property as far as what people think of when they think about
the property. He said the overlay is going prevent another restaurant coming into the space. He
stated this is exactly why we have TIFs because this is a gateway to the city. He said this area has
been up for discussion for the last ten years. He commended everyone for working on this.
Mr. Fojtik said this gives a chance to correct some mistakes from the original development in terms
of building layout. He said given the long time the area has sat and the aviation overlay
restrictions,he feels this is an appropriate step.
Motion carried 9-0.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at approximately 5:23 pm. (Hinz/Propp)
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Lyons
Acting Planning Services Manager
Plan Commission Minutes July 2,2019
Page 62